I'm unsure what this sexuality is... [No google results]

Recommended Videos

Unfairestsquid

New member
May 31, 2011
17
0
0
I know most people are saying your just straight but what your talking about kinda sounds like this weird subculture i was reading about awhile back
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckold
If that doesn't sound like it to you your probably just straight
 

Not G. Ivingname

New member
Nov 18, 2009
6,368
0
0
DrgoFx said:
Hmm...

Well, sounds like some form of bisexuality, but it can depend.

What gender interests you in a relationship? Which do you want to date? That I think is a much bigger factor in your sexuality.

By how it sounds, with the information you have given, it could just be your preference in porn.
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
nekoali said:
-snip-

Note that sexual attraction and what porn you watch are not related. A straight man watching lesbian (or gay male!) porn doesn't make them gay or bi or anything else. Sure, most people stick to watching stuff they would like to be involved in themselves, so you won't see a whole lot of straight guys watching gay male porn... But it doesn't matter if they did. The only important issue is who you are attracted to.
That's a bit of a stretch if you ask me; if you're a male getting off on watching gay porn, you're gay/Bi sexual to a certain extent, or at least have curiosities, if you were straight, it wouldn't arouse you and you certainty wouldn't be able to get off on it.

I'm personally not bothered by the men in male-female porn, I've seen enough dicks in porn to know I'm straight, I just ignore it, but nothing kills a boner more than accidently stumbling on two men going at it, not because I have a problem with it, but I just think the male form is a bit horrible to look at naked.

Sort of veering back to the OP; I mean lets be honest here, at hot two girls going at it is in real life, in porn it tends to be a bit...shit, it needs to be shot/done well to come off as actually working, especially when they all have massive nails(no lesbian I know has long nails, for good fucking reason really, nobody wants those inside them) and are blatantly putting the whole thing on, male-female porn is a lot easier to fake and make look good than lesbian porn. But then I'm a bit of an elitist with my porn; I'm the sort of person that complains about the camera man being shit.

Unfairestsquid said:
I know most people are saying your just straight but what your talking about kinda sounds like this weird subculture i was reading about awhile back
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckold
If that doesn't sound like it to you your probably just straight
I'd say it was more a specific type of voyeurism, I don't think he's said anything about actually being there, just what he likes in his porn. Cuckolding is getting off on seeing someone else screw your missus.
 

Whateveralot

New member
Oct 25, 2010
953
0
0
You know that sexuality has NOTHING to do with what you like to fap to.

Because you don't like lesbian / gay porn, doesn't mean you're not hetrosexual. You're either male or female and you are attracted to either male or female.

You are homosexual when you either:
- Are female and are attracted to other females.
- Are male and are attracted to other males.

You are heterosexual / straight when you are either:
- Male and attracted to females.
- Female and attracted to males.

And you are bi-sexual when you are attracted to both.

These are the main ones. There's all sort of fetishes (think pedophilia, necrophilia, etc.), and there is a-sexuality; where you are not physically attracted to any gender.



I hope that, with this knowledge, you know what you're talking about. Because you're simply explaining to us that you enjoy straight porn. Good for you, but there's nothing special about that.

tl;dr
You are not talking about your sexuality. You're simply telling us that you like straight porn. Awesome.
 

Call me Baz

New member
Nov 26, 2011
86
0
0
The phrase I would use for you is "Heterosexually voyeuristic". A Voyeur is someone who derives sexual pleasure from observations of sexual acts. As you state so clearly that there must be a man and woman both, hetero.

This is more of a fetish than a sexuality, so you are bisexual if you would consider acts between either gender. What gives you excitement/pleasure when watching pornography is not what defines your sexuality.
 

CaptainMarvelous

New member
May 9, 2012
869
0
0
DrgoFx said:
So I recently found out what my sexuality is specifically but I haven't found a name for it. I googled the "requirements" for it, but I'm really uncertain. I'm not pansexual, because gender is still a factor, but it's close...I think. What my attraction towards is not solely female or male, but the interaction between male and female. By this I mean I don't find girl-on-girl action interesting. I don't find a girl getting off interesting. Same with guys. It's specifically a girl and a guy, no matter what. I don't know why that is, and I'm not disgusted by the rest but it's just not arousing to me. So what exactly is this? I mean, the sexes still are in play, it's just since I'm a man, I look for a woman. If I was a woman, I'd look for a man.

EDIT: Fuck sleeping...No, it's not heterosexuality. Unless I missed something, I'm not attracted to the opposite sex alone. I'm attracted to the interaction between opposite sexes.

In other words: I will not find a masturbating woman appealing, but the moment a guy gets involved I'm all for it. Two girls using dildos does nothing for me, but once a guy jumps in I'm all for it. Same with guys, not appealing until a girl is involved. Unless I'm missing something, Heterosexuality is the attraction to the opposite sex alone, but that's not what I'm attracted to.
Voyuerism, or in creepier terms "I like to watch o.o"
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
Whateveralot said:
These are the main ones. There's all sort of fetishes (think pedophilia, necrophilia, etc.), and there is a-sexuality; where you are not physically attracted to any gender.
Not attacking you, but I love how you've instantly gone to the two worst ones as an example for fetishes :p There's good ones too man, where's the love for those?
 

mrhappy1489

New member
May 12, 2011
499
0
0
SmashLovesTitanQuest said:
Yep, it looks like it has happened.

We have now officially reached the point where people start forgetting there is such a thing as heterosexuality.

The conservatives were right!
I love you Smash, your comments always make me giggle quite a bit whenever I read them. But just by your name, I realise that you can love no other so I accept you for that, but still, amusing comment dude.
 

Whateveralot

New member
Oct 25, 2010
953
0
0
elvor0 said:
Whateveralot said:
These are the main ones. There's all sort of fetishes (think pedophilia, necrophilia, etc.), and there is a-sexuality; where you are not physically attracted to any gender.
Not attacking you, but I love how you've instantly gone to the two worst ones as an example for fetishes :p There's good ones too man, where's the love for those?
I was just talking out of personal experience.


Just kidding, I'm no childcorpse molester. It was just the first two things that popped up. We all know a bunch... Foot sex (weird), (semi-)public places, anal sex (is that even a fetish?), filming yourself, etc. etc.

There's lotsa love.
 

Kael Arawn

New member
Mar 4, 2012
86
0
0
What an interesting thread, I must admit that I find the ideals being expressed here about what it takes to be straight/gay/bi etc are to be rather quaint.

What I would like to point out is that there?s another option, asexuality.

And before everyone start saying BUT THAT?S WHATS SNAILS AND FROGS ARE YUCK DUDE YOU CANT f&*k YOURSELF!

In humans it means something completely different, in humans asexuality means that the section of your brain normally associated with sex is inactive/almost dormant and because of which you don?t find ANYTHING attractive when it comes to sex.

I myself am a diagnosed asexual, and it basically translates to the fact that if a good looking guy or girl where sitting in the same room as me I would be more interested in the paint colour of the room/interesting objects within it etc then having sex with either of them.

While its heinously disruptive towards my ability to fit into a ?normal socio-sexual demographic? within society (i.e. I couldn?t tell if a girl or guy was interested in me as I don?t cognitively address the signs) it does mean that I?m free to experience life void of the frustration?s associated with a sexual existence/relationships in general.

I also blame this lack of interest in sex as one of the key reasons I?m such a nerd, books, comics, games, movies, tv, all these things interest me WAY MORE than anything to do with sex and thusly I spend FAR TO MUCH TIME partaking in these things as they ?really excite me? (im not kidding I have friends who say I get more excited about a new game/book ect then they do when they know they?re going to get laid).

I have had numerous girlfriends in life and even a boyfriend at one stage an while I have experienced and participated in sex it always feels like a choir I?m doing to keep the relationship going.

That?s about it really, just wondering if anyone else is ?hard wired like this? on the escapist and sorry for being so far off topic I just thought people mind find it interesting.
 

Zack Alklazaris

New member
Oct 6, 2011
1,938
0
0
DrgoFx said:
So I recently found out what my sexuality is specifically but I haven't found a name for it. I googled the "requirements" for it, but I'm really uncertain. I'm not pansexual, because gender is still a factor, but it's close...I think. What my attraction towards is not solely female or male, but the interaction between male and female. By this I mean I don't find girl-on-girl action interesting. I don't find a girl getting off interesting. Same with guys. It's specifically a girl and a guy, no matter what. I don't know why that is, and I'm not disgusted by the rest but it's just not arousing to me. So what exactly is this? I mean, the sexes still are in play, it's just since I'm a man, I look for a woman. If I was a woman, I'd look for a man.

EDIT: Fuck sleeping...No, it's not heterosexuality. Unless I missed something, I'm not attracted to the opposite sex alone. I'm attracted to the interaction between opposite sexes.

In other words: I will not find a masturbating woman appealing, but the moment a guy gets involved I'm all for it. Two girls using dildos does nothing for me, but once a guy jumps in I'm all for it. Same with guys, not appealing until a girl is involved. Unless I'm missing something, Heterosexuality is the attraction to the opposite sex alone, but that's not what I'm attracted to.
Why can't you just be a more sensual guy who needs interaction between sexes to get off?


Why does it need a name? Where is this sudden urge to find a name for every slight difference in mentality. I'm not directing this specifically at you, but at the general public. Does every heterosexual guy out there like lesbians? Girls masturbating? Is that just a requirement?
 

brunothepig

New member
May 18, 2009
2,163
0
0
Braedan said:
I find it quite odd that we need to have a label for every sub sub sub sub genre of anything ever invented. Take Metal for example. Sure it's useful to differentiate between Metallica and Slayer. But when people tell you to die because it's not Death metal, it's Black metal, I tend to stop listening.

But more importantly, back on topic:

Sorry, this post pulled me up more than the OP. I'm one of those who loves toying with genre classification, and I can understand not caring about the difference between Melodic and Symphonic Black Metal (for example). But the fact that you mentioned distinguishing between Slayer and Metallica, who are two of the biggest Thrash Metal bands in the world (yes both of them), then implied there's little variation in Black Metal and Death Metal is confusing the hell out of me. Do you listen to a lot of the heavier stuff? Because there is a huge difference between Black and Death. Simply put, Black Metal is typically raw, and not very technical, while Death takes the foundation of Black and adds Thrash sensibilities, much faster and much more skill involved.
Instrumental version of the song because I just love this video.
Feel free to ignore me, I just needed to get that off my chest.

 

Braedan

New member
Sep 14, 2010
697
0
0
brunothepig said:
Snip snip snippity
Naw I wont ignore you. No I don't listen to a lot of metal, which is why I just pulled two names out of my ass that I thought had a different sound. It is difficult to really care when someone get offended about music sub genre labels. Similar to electronic fans turning up their nose when I call dubstep alarmclock musi techno. I just don't really have time to study a style of music that I don't even enjoy. I can understand being able to tell the difference between types when you're a big fan, but trying to make people who can't tell do the same is a little silly.

Edit: oooops. Sorry, back on topic

 

brunothepig

New member
May 18, 2009
2,163
0
0
Braedan said:
brunothepig said:
Snip snip snippity
Naw I wont ignore you. No I don't listen to a lot of metal, which is why I just pulled two names out of my ass that I thought had a different sound. It is difficult to really care when someone get offended about music sub genre labels. Similar to electronic fans turning up their nose when I call dubstep alarmclock musi techno. I just don't really have time to study a style of music that I don't even enjoy. I can understand being able to tell the difference between types when you're a big fan, but trying to make people who can't tell do the same is a little silly.

Edit: oooops. Sorry, back on topic

Yeah that's fair enough then. I wasn't attacking you or anything, I was just honestly baffled haha. You managed to randomly pick two very odd comparisons is all. I agree though, it's weird about people getting offended by this kind of stuff. My friends and I while away the time by debating the classification of bands, there's naturally going to be some leeway once you start getting specific. But yeah, your examples were really odd there...

Getting back on topic, I like your contribution.