imagine if you will.......Fallout 4

[spindle]

also strength should affect appearance. I hate how everyone in F3 has the same body.

 

[Joshimodo]

They are making another fallout, its not called fallout 4, its called fallout new vegas.

If you read the thread, you'll see that it's not a sequel, it's a spinoff.

yeah but intelligence was better when setting it to one made you a dribbling retard incapable of speech. There's no real negative impact to low scores in fallout 3.

I see where you're coming from, however charisma should stay as the defining factor, and intelligence allows for further improvements rather than just occasional speech checks.

 

[spindle]

They are making another fallout, its not called fallout 4, its called fallout new vegas.

If you read the thread, you'll see that it's not a sequel, it's a spinoff.

yeah but intelligence was better when setting it to one made you a dribbling retard incapable of speech. There's no real negative impact to low scores in fallout 3.

They made a huge mistake changing the character/combat system.

 

[Sparrow]

Fallout 1 and 2 fans are just assholes. Seriously, I haven't met a nice one.

Therefore it's a simple test of character. I like the third, and the I think the first and second are okay. Therefore I am god.

Thanks for you time.

 

[scnj]

I just want traits back, and not getting a perk every level, so we have to create specialist characters instead of having characters that are masters of everything by level 12 or so.

Also, intelligence should affect dialogue.

Intelligence doesn't directly affect dialogue in real life, though. I know plenty of people who are doing degree-level sciences and computing, and yet they aren't exactly charismatic fellows.

That's true, but it added a degree of humour to the first two that was sorely missing from the third.

 

[Baneat]

I'm more interested in what Bethesda has to offer in the TES series currently. 3 was amazing, FTisometric crap.

 

[Chrissyluky]

http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Portal:Fallout:_New_Vegas all the info you would want on fallout new vegas

 

[lonny2x4x5]

London with a 1920s feel.
I want to know what happened in Europe.

But Fallout is about America.

but the fallout happenned everywhere, y exclude the world?

 

[similar.squirrel]

London with a 1920s feel.
I want to know what happened in Europe.

But Fallout is about America.

No, its about the cold-war and the consequences of it. We have only seen it from the point of view of America at this point. A bit about China too.
There where still consequences other places. I want to see them.

Nah. I think Fallout is what it is because of that weird, twisted view of Americana gone weird.

 

[Chrissyluky]

London with a 1920s feel.
I want to know what happened in Europe.

But Fallout is about America.

No, its about the cold-war and the consequences of it. We have only seen it from the point of view of America at this point. A bit about China too.
There where still consequences other places. I want to see them.

Nah. I think Fallout is what it is because of that weird, twisted view of Americana gone weird.

i agree that was the fun in it.

 

[Leftyrem]

one in canada would be good (us annex canada) or an expasion there but itll never happen "sigh"

 

[smokeybearsb]

Not saying its coming out, just think about it though it takes place in new york this time.
come up with your own ideas for the game, anything just post it in a comment.

Don't have to imagine Fallout 4. Fallout: New Vegas will be out next year made by Obsidian Entertainment. Hopefully it will be akin to something like Knights of the Old Republic. That would be awesome.

If it was turn-based, I would fucking kill myself. Even if the original Fallouts were turn-based, I am used to F3. That's where I started.

 

[paragon1]

Well I hope it isn't the same people who made Neverwinter Nights Two or Knights of the Old Republic Two. Both those games were unfinished messes that were far far worse than the original. I hope they've undergone some drastic changes in the intervening years or all those fanboys that keep crying about how Bethesda fucked up Fallout 3 (which I don't understand btw, I played 1 and 2, and frankly I liked 3 BETTER) are suddenly going to have something to actually complain about.

 

[Jupsto]

bethesda > interplay

HAVE IT!

 

[Dr.Sean]

Fallout 4 with better graphics than Fallout 3? You mean ghouls that look real? No thanks.

 

[Sindre1]

London with a 1920s feel.
I want to know what happened in Europe.

But Fallout is about America.

No, its about the cold-war and the consequences of it. We have only seen it from the point of view of America at this point. A bit about China too.
There where still consequences other places. I want to see them.

Nah. I think Fallout is what it is because of that weird, twisted view of Americana gone weird.

Some part of the feel to it, yes.
But other cultures can "go weird" aswell. Besides, if the next Fallout where simply just set in another US city it would feel too much like F3.

 

[Nutcase]

How about Fallout 4 : The Sanctuary. Where you live on an untouched tropical paradise that was left untouched by the nuclear holocaust and you are surrounded by clean food an other people that are just as insanely attractive as yourself.

No?

Sure! Only issue I have is with the name; "Fallout Xtreme Beach Volleyball" would be catchier.

I want Bethesda on the project. This would be right up their alley. They are no strangers to the tropics, having done the gaming classics known as "Pirates of the Caribbean". And in Oblivion they proved themselves masters of character wardrobe variety; I'm sure they can offer a great selection of bikinis for your role-playing character to wear in FXBV.

 

[Nutcase]

I just want traits back, and not getting a perk every level, so we have to create specialist characters instead of having characters that are masters of everything by level 12 or so.

Also, intelligence should affect dialogue.

Intelligence doesn't directly affect dialogue in real life, though. I know plenty of people who are doing degree-level sciences and computing, and yet they aren't exactly charismatic fellows.

Of course intelligence affects dialogue. An intelligent person is capable of understanding and perceiving things (implications, logical consequences, hidden meanings) a stupid person is not capable of understanding or perceiving. Therefore the intelligent person can talk of those things, and the stupid person cannot since he doesn't know they exist.

It's like adults and children sitting together at a dinner table, and the adults talking with each other about something. Not a specialized field - this is not a question of knowledge - but something the children have all the necessary knowledge to talk of. Yet, unless the adults pay attention to the children, specifically try to involve them and explain things in detail, they cannot readily follow the conversation or participate in it or even recall the key points later. This is because of the difference in intelligence. It's no different with intelligent and stupid adults. I have sat at tables where one half of the table has an animated conversation going on, and the other half stays mute because they simply cannot think of things at that level.

Charisma should have more to do with how the NPCs respond to what you say. A charismatic person might get away with saying something rude - the NPC might interpret it as humor or something - while a non-charismatic person might get beat up for saying it. A charismatic person might be able to persuade someone into a business deal by appearing more trustworthy than a non-charismatic person. Et cetera.

 

[Dr. Gorgenflex]

Fallout 4 MMO?