Okay, let's say it's a female prisoner and she's sexually assaulted as part of her interrogation. Do we still get to call it rape, or is it just interrogation?Ephraim J. Witchwood said:Precisely. Thank you for understanding what I was trying to say.Enkidu88 said:your basically saying electrocuting someone to get information is violent interrogation but electrocuting someone for kicks is torture.Ephraim J. Witchwood said:The definition of the word "torture" as it is currently does encompass violent interrogation as a form of torture. In my not motherfucking humble at all opinion, the definition is wrong, and violent interrogation is not a form of torture.
Now quit fucking quoting me with attempts to change my opinion with your bullshit.
Also is it beyond you to be able to have a civil debate or do you have the same debating skills as a doped up drug addict who has just been arrested by the cops?
I'm not a very "civil" person when it comes to debates (or arguments) over anything, really. I prefer to get my point across as aggressively as possible. Unless of course I'm in my very rare zen-ish state of mind.
See, I think the point you're missing, Mr. Witchwood, is that torture is, potentially, a component of interrogation, and they are not mutually exclusive. I mean, it's like saying that if you build a house with bricks, it's a brick, and not a house. Or maybe you say it's a house, but you refuse to acknowledge it was made with bricks. See? It's ridiculous.
Is Sam Fisher torturing people in Splinter Cell: Conviction during the interrogation scenes? Damn right he is. But the real issue is that he has no other choice if he wants to avert a catastrophe. He's dealing with some really nasty people in that game, and simply asking them nicely how he can foil their plot just isn't going to cut it. Trying to redefine torture and interrogation in an attempt to avoid this moral dilemma does a disservice to his character, I think.