Ok, just curious as I've never seen you be that open about anything on the site.Evil Smurf said:No, I really think that. I am a pretty open guy. That user group is not that bad eitherSassafrass said:Now, is that what you truly think or is it because you're a part of a user group that tries to start flame wars when they notice a potentially flamey thread?Evil Smurf said:Emma Watson has the creepiest fans, I would know. I am a fanSmashLovesTitanQuest said:Is my sisters name Emma Watson?
No?
No incest for me then.
as long as it is consensual with both parties the go for it!
OT: Ew and fuck no are my answers.
You, sir, A) Stole my answer, and B) Get a cookie. That was golden!SmashLovesTitanQuest said:Is my sisters name Emma Watson?
No?
No incest for me then.
I suggest going back and re-reading this thread. In particular my last post as it deals directly with how this is a rather large misconception. Two people who are related and have children will not suddenly give birth to little mutants, or children with genetic disorders solely because they chose to have a child with their sister/brother/cousin/whatever. The risk is increased because if one carries the genes for a specific disorder, the other likely does as well, but people in the general population could get together who both carry the genes for any number of disorders anyway. And even then, it's not a sure thing that the child will have it. Unless you're prepared to force every couple to undergo genetic testing and prevent those who carry genes for disorders from having children (which would be unethical to subject someone to), there is no basis to do the same to family members engaging in an incestuous relationship.Sparrow said:Well, I agree with this to a certain point... if you're adults, do what you want sexually but for crying out loud, don't have kids. A) That kid is going to get genetically screwed because you took it upon yourself to screw your genetics.
Sure. There's absolutely nothing wrong with forcing an arbitrary morality not supported by reason, logic or science on other people. It's just icky and people shouldn't be allowed to do it.Casual Shinji said:Somethings don't need to be countered by logic or anything else, it's just common sense not to do it.
Willingly fucking your blood relatives is one of these things.
I have a bazaar political alignment being communism, a fairly sexually deviated mindset but bazaarly don't think Gay marriage is right. The reason I only say this in usergroups is I don't like being hammered with bans. You know, extremes are not appreciated here.Sassafrass said:Ok, just curious as I've never seen you be that open about anything on the site.
And I'll believe that when the CM isn't posting in it.![]()
Regarding incest?Vivi22 said:Sure. There's absolutely nothing wrong with forcing an arbitrary morality not supported by reason, logic or science on other people. It's just icky and people shouldn't be allowed to do it.Casual Shinji said:Somethings don't need to be countered by logic or anything else, it's just common sense not to do it.
Willingly fucking your blood relatives is one of these things.
No, apparently this is one of those "if you don't have an open mind about incest you're a nazi" discussions.What is this? The 1st grade?
They are allowed here, otherwise half of the RP crowd would be long gone by now.Evil Smurf said:I have a bazaar political alignment being communism, a fairly sexually deviated mindset but bazaarly don't think Gay marriage is right. The reason I only say this in usergroups is I don't like being hammered with bans. You know, extremes are not appreciated here.Sassafrass said:Ok, just curious as I've never seen you be that open about anything on the site.
And I'll believe that when the CM isn't posting in it.![]()
I called you no such thing. I merely pointed out that your position is unsupportable.Casual Shinji said:No, apparently this is one of those "if you don't have an open mind about incest you're a nazi" discussions.What is this? The 1st grade?