well that is somthing interesting I hadnt considered before....Overusedname said:[spoiler/]I'll compare this to another issue: You know how homosexuality has been proven by all non-religously funded science to be harmless? And that kids from families with gay people or gay adoptive parents tend to be very happy and healthy? And there are just (adjusted for proportion) just as many long lasting monogamous gay relationships as heterosexual ones. The gays are accepted cause science and empathy make it clear they're A-okay. If they have problems, it's not because they're gay.
Incest doesn't have that kind of track record. Biologically and psychologically there seems to be real harm. There is some debate, but power imbalance will almost always be present with Older-younger siblings, or parents having sex with their kids. In this sense, how consensual is it? 18 year old daughter and 49 year old father...I hesitate to say the daughter has a lot of power in this sexual relationship. It can also lead to a lack of division of relationships, extreme promiscuity without protection. Not just healthy sexual liberality, just the need to consider everyone a sex partner. This shatters the divides between friend, brother, and fuck buddy, leading to issues forming lasting bonds and forming confident social bonds based on things outside of sex. It's hard to find statistics on this, but people involved in incest are often very promiscuous, to a physically dangerous extent. Because to them, all relationships become sex-based. These are case by case studies obviously, but I can't find many to say someone is happy after having incest.
Abuse victims consistently show signs of depression, and even before kids are taught about 'the places under their bathing suits', they still consistently report feeling great discomfort and fear and intimidation after molestation, long before sexual thoughts are in their noggin in a meaningful way. In addition, their are the natural downsides of unhealthy children consistently produced via incestuous conception.
Maybe someday their will be some exception to the rule. But I can't find any reports about them. There may be bias in this research, of course, and for some, there definitely is. I personally think it's very dangerous, and will almost always be harmful in many ways to both parties, especially the younger. I only say this because I see very little evidence to the contrary. I'm an atheist with very flexible morality based on science, rationality, empathy and love for my fellow man. I'm going off nature, science, study and a dash of gut feeling. I genuinely think touching your sister the wrong way is going to mess both of you up later.[/spoiler]
That's fine be me.Vivi22 said:I called you no such thing. I merely pointed out that your position is unsupportable.Casual Shinji said:No, apparently this is one of those "if you don't have an open mind about incest you're a nazi" discussions.What is this? The 1st grade?
A few decades ago, homosexuality also had a pretty bad track record, simply because most gays were in the closet, so man of the ones who got outed were the ones caught with their pants down, often while raping someone, thus enforcing the stereotype that gays are depraved pedophiles, and generally sex-obsessed people who would fuck anything that moves.Overusedname said:I'll compare this to another issue: You know how homosexuality has been proven by all non-religously funded science to be harmless? And that kids from families with gay people or gay adoptive parents tend to be very happy and healthy? And there are just (adjusted for proportion) just as many long lasting monogamous gay relationships as heterosexual ones. The gays are accepted cause science and empathy make it clear they're A-okay. If they have problems, it's not because they're gay.
Incest doesn't have that kind of track record. Biologically and psychologically there seems to be real harm.
What's your stance on allowing people with genetic disorders to reproduce?Sparrow said:That kid is going to get genetically screwed because you took it upon yourself to screw your genetics
How? I what love to see what evidence you base this on.Signa said:Yeah....no. I mean, consenting adults and all that, but I can't see how engaging in incest wouldn't alter you psychologically for the worse,
The same could be said about absolutely any couple and is a ridiculous thing to try and hang your hat on in making incest illegal or taboo. And the implication that a child growing up with some genetic disorder can't have an perfectly enjoyable life is kind of offensive.and you can't 100% guarantee that mutant babies wouldn't happen. If that happens, then it isn't harmless anymore, someone has to live their life messed up because of your poor choices.
You raise a good point. I almost noted the comparison with the anti-gay propaganda, but I hesitated as my research of the issue has yielded millions of well adjusted gay couples (many with children), and no such luck for incest. I can find well-adjusted, happy and loving polygamists, who are perhaps just as hated as people engaged in incest.Entitled said:A few decades ago, homosexuality also had a pretty bad track record, simply because most gays were in the closet, so man of the ones who got outed were the ones caught with their pants down, often while raping someone, thus enforcing the stereotype that gays are depraved pedophiles, and generally sex-obsessed people who would fuck anything that moves.Overusedname said:I'll compare this to another issue: You know how homosexuality has been proven by all non-religously funded science to be harmless? And that kids from families with gay people or gay adoptive parents tend to be very happy and healthy? And there are just (adjusted for proportion) just as many long lasting monogamous gay relationships as heterosexual ones. The gays are accepted cause science and empathy make it clear they're A-okay. If they have problems, it's not because they're gay.
Incest doesn't have that kind of track record. Biologically and psychologically there seems to be real harm.
Maybe the same is the case with incest. It's such a big taboo, that even if an average person doesn't feel the westermarck effect as strongly as others, they would rather deny getting turned on by family members, or at least do it secretly, so we don't see them having well-adjusted incestous relationships, and the only ones that don't follow that, are the ones with abnormally strong sex drives, or otherwise unwilling the follow cultural norms.
I know this wasn't aimed at me, but just wanted to comment. Decent comparison there...I would encourage adoption myself, but considering the fact that we all have genetic problems...well, you know. We'd die out with those standards. I wouldn't bar people with disorder from reproduction. No one should.What's your stance on allowing people with genetic disorders to reproduce?Sparrow said:That kid is going to get genetically screwed because you took it upon yourself to screw your genetics
The trouble is that it's not only so stigmatized that you may never find examples of it, but in many places it also happens to be illegal if I'm not mistaken (I'm almost positive it is to some extent in Canada). I'd bet most people who engage in it that are otherwise healthy and well adjusted are also so afraid of going to prison that they try very hard to make sure no one finds out.Overusedname said:If I'm presented with evidence to the contrary, I'll listen and reevaluate my thoughts. I've learned to always question what I hear. Consider how hated polygamy is, it's interesting I was able to find well-adjusted examples of it. I can't find any for incest without problems directly linked to social, psychological and sexual health issues.