I don't think I have anything incriminating to classify me as a terrorist in my house, but I do have a book from the library that I've been borrowing for about 4 years now.
Incriminating Evidence
- Thread starter wikicated
- Start date
Recommended Videos
What... just laying around? All my incriminating evidence is carefully hidden in the shed out the back, I will have you know!
Joking aside... there was something I found just laying around. A bong I had cut apart somehow magically appeared on my desk. I've also found seeds littering the room here and there, good looking seeds that make me wonder if I can get away with growing some smoke seeing I can't buy it any more, no contacts left.
That is all but to be fair I have been out of the country for four months. Which is what makes me ponder that bong remains, I am SURE I threw them out before I left and just how long they have sat there, where anyone could see them. Oh well....
Joking aside... there was something I found just laying around. A bong I had cut apart somehow magically appeared on my desk. I've also found seeds littering the room here and there, good looking seeds that make me wonder if I can get away with growing some smoke seeing I can't buy it any more, no contacts left.
That is all but to be fair I have been out of the country for four months. Which is what makes me ponder that bong remains, I am SURE I threw them out before I left and just how long they have sat there, where anyone could see them. Oh well....
oh i think i'd be classified more dangerous than you, OP, if it ever came to it.
And The Art of War is an amazing book.
I have books on torture and serial killers
I have many knives, swords, daggers, chains etc.....most of them costume pieces though.... but are very real and very dangerously sharp(costume pieces meaning i bought them for costumes)
dismantled cell phones.....bluetooth's.......so many random electronics and such.....yeah.....
plus my chemistry stuff
And The Art of War is an amazing book.
I have books on torture and serial killers
I have many knives, swords, daggers, chains etc.....most of them costume pieces though.... but are very real and very dangerously sharp(costume pieces meaning i bought them for costumes)
dismantled cell phones.....bluetooth's.......so many random electronics and such.....yeah.....
plus my chemistry stuff
I own a particularly sharp coat hanger and I can make my hand into the shape of a gun AT WILL!
Naa I'm not dangerous
Yesss, yesss, lure them into a false sense of security then burn them! BURN THEM ALL!!! *grabs a sharp piece of soap and acts menacing*
Naa I'm not dangerous
Yesss, yesss, lure them into a false sense of security then burn them! BURN THEM ALL!!! *grabs a sharp piece of soap and acts menacing*
I do. He uses Terror to get through to the people. That's not too different from a terrorist.corroded said:One mans freedom fighter is another mans terrorist.xxhazyshadowsxx said:Here, I made a labeling category, so we can tell the difference:Gormourn said:
Terrorist:
Not:
While the Government unjustly pins many people every day.. you're safe OP.
I don't consider V a terrorist.
You can argue that he's a freedom fighter as well, as his motives aren't for one's personal gain, but I digress.
It's both shocking and sad that so many posters here live in a society where knives are incriminating evidence. They're effing tools. Is it legal for me to own a claw hammer in your area? How about a chisel set? Stupid bloody nonsense.
Okay, back to OP. Huh... When I lived in Germany I bought a few airsoft pistols. Since they don't have orange tips, they're probably of questionable legality in the U.S. And, yeah, OP... You're making mountains out of molehills, unless you're actually doing something, such as purchasing suspicious quantities of ammonium nitrate, with all that knowledge.
Okay, back to OP. Huh... When I lived in Germany I bought a few airsoft pistols. Since they don't have orange tips, they're probably of questionable legality in the U.S. And, yeah, OP... You're making mountains out of molehills, unless you're actually doing something, such as purchasing suspicious quantities of ammonium nitrate, with all that knowledge.
A good point. Well said good sir.corroded said:Actually, ironically he doesn't use terror to get through to people, that is precisely what he doesn't do, and at no point ever intented to harm the populace. The government uses the 'threat of terror' to attempt to control the people.xxhazyshadowsxx said:I do. He uses Terror to get through to the people. That's not too different from a terrorist.corroded said:One mans freedom fighter is another mans terrorist.xxhazyshadowsxx said:Here, I made a labeling category, so we can tell the difference:Gormourn said:
Terrorist:
Not:
While the Government unjustly pins many people every day.. you're safe OP.
I don't consider V a terrorist.
You can argue that he's a freedom fighter as well, as his motives aren't for one's personal gain, but I digress.
He was responsible for the destruction of the Bailey, when it was empty. Using the Bomb as a distraction to get his message out, and i do wonder if that was a mere distraction (a dud). Even the final acts themselves didn't actually kill anyone.
He never actually killed anyone in a Terrorist act. He certainly killed, sometimes for defence, sometimes for nothing more than revenge and sometimes to achieve his goal, to over throw the government.
As i say, Terrorist is subjective at the best of times. But V clearly isn't a Terrorist, unless your definition of terrorism is 'blows stuff up'
And no, my definition of Terrorist is "Using Terror as a means to get your point across."
But just one more note: At no time does anyone have to be harmed for the act to be considered "Of Terrorist Nature."
