Gethsemani said:
Paragon Fury said:
The sheer increase in numbers would make trying more worthwhile though; going from a 5% chance to a 10% chance is still bad odds, but significantly better.
Except love is not really a numbers game like that. The only way you can say that love is a numbers game is in the regard that meeting more people increases the reference pool for you and thus increases the chance that someone you've met will be of romantic interest to you.
Dating still comes down to "do I hit it off with this other person?" and that chance is unlikely to change just because there are more people around. Or rather, when you go on a date you don't think "can I do better than this?", you think "is this someone who I have romantic feelings for?". If you can't instill those feelings in someone else, your chances of finding a partner remains as low as before, no matter how many people you could potentially get to go on a first date with you. So these alien girls would increase the reference pool of potential partners for all guys, but those men that lack the ability to instill romantic interest would still be just as boned, because they'd be unlikely to do any better then they are now. If you can't afford a car, it doesn't matter how many new cars are produced every year (to use a terrible analogy).
This actually leads into part of why I posed the question in the first place; and that is what would it be like if dating suddenly became a men's game again?
This requires a bit of explanation, so I'll give the cliff notes version;
Mating in humans, biologically, is almost 100% a woman's game; they normally have complete and total control over the process, selections of mates, are have an almost 100% reproduction success rate throughout human history. Males by contrast have a HORRIBLE success rate - some estimates have it that only 40% of men who have ever lived have a descendant with their DNA left today (compared to all the women who have ever lived).
It is a big reason why so many societies try to purposefully rig the rules in favor of men - as many people even here can attest to.
The only times mating in humans becomes a men's game is when there is a sudden shortage of men - IE: directly following a large disaster or war (men, as we all know, typically suffer tremendously more causalities during these kinds of events than women do).
The last time this happened was in the wake of WW2 - having two major global conflicts back-to-back SEVERELY depleted the number of mating/dating age men across the globe, even the in US. Men for several generations were on the "winning" side of the equation - women had to compete for them and couldn't risk being nearly as picky as they'd like to be (as there were neither the men around nor had women gained the economic power yet to afford to be able to do so).
Then the numbers leveled back out, women gained more economic power and the technological revolution happened and mating/dating has been for quite some time a purely women's game again (in fact, I think we've had this discussion in another topic).
Part of the question here was; what would happen if suddenly the numbers became imbalanced again - where the numbers now became a men's game again? Then there additional parts as to what would happen if the imbalance also included say, making the standards for beauty much higher etc.
EDIT: I misquoted the % for males, and have fixed it above.