Interactive Advertisement: The next step?

Recommended Videos

Yassen

New member
Apr 5, 2008
1,308
0
0
Let me tell you a bit about my father. He worked in advertising for 30 years, now in this business that's a long time... like surviving to be 80 during the years of the black plague. Most advertising agencies want to constantly bring in new blood to keep things fresh as the last thing you want is for your adds to blend into the background of blandness. The fact my father lasted so long showed he had a profound understanding in how to appeal to the masses, want to know the secret?

Start a cult. Or at least make your consumers feel like they're in one.

When you make your product feel more like a community, your consumers will be more willing to depend entirely on your one product. You can even see this sort of thing in the video game console market. I'm sure I don't need to go into the way some gamers fight for their desired console and why it's better than the others. How do companies do this? By making xbox users part of a "community", same with the playstation cult.

Now there's a new method over the horizon, or at least from what I can see coming.

You want to know what scares the shit out of advertisement companies? The power for us, the viewers, to avoid adds all together. When I record a television show, I can play it whenever I want and can fast-forward through the adds. This terrifies companies so they've been trying to come up with plans to make sure we can't skip their "informative offers." You know how they've started putting adds at the start of certain youtube videos that you have to watch before the video you want loads? Well I'm sure you simply do what I do and mute the volume and do something else. But now they're trying something new.

To make sure you absolutely can not skip their advertisments, some video streaming programs require you to perform some action on the screen to continue. It wouldn't surprise me that this strategy will become more widespread in a matter of years, but I'm curious, what do you dear reader, think?

Is this the simple, unavoidable outcome of advertising we simply have to clench our teeth and deal with? Could it possibly spread from the internet into television itself some day? Or am I simply overreacting and these companies would never do this?
 

Mukil

New member
Mar 23, 2010
180
0
0
I have only come across ads like that on blip.tv, but if you ignore it long enough it plays the ad.
Although when from your thread I thought you were talking about the tippex advert, which is genius!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ba1BqJ4S2M
 

Vie

New member
Nov 18, 2009
932
0
0
The idea is doomed to failure, the majority of people will just skip back and look for the video somewhere else.

Plus no doubt a Firefox extension will come along to fix the issue, letting you skip the ad.
 

thenumberthirteen

Unlucky for some
Dec 19, 2007
4,794
0
0
I think it will spread, but obtrusive advertising can be worse than none at all. I do find the unskippable 30 second ads on blip a bit annoying since you can't skip them any more.
 

hurfdurp

New member
Jun 7, 2010
949
0
0
How disheartening. I can see that being a possibility. Surely there is a point where people are barraged with ads too much :(?
 

Quad08

New member
Oct 18, 2009
5,000
0
0
I remember hearing how, in terms of billboard advertising, they were going to attach retinal sensors onto the billboards that would detect how long people looked at certain ads, thus finding out what is needed to grab a persons attention.

This could be formulated into the internet, if adverisors began keeping track of what ads were skipped/closed and what ads were left open/viewed
 

SturmDolch

This Title is Ironic
May 17, 2009
2,346
0
0
This sounds kind of annoying. But as long as it's just a click, and the click doesn't open a new window, it's not too obtrusive. And, of course, there's always extensions that block ads and they seem to work on Youtube for me.

As for television, I think product placement will be more widespread. Or how about when you watch a show, in the middle of it, a character might be watching TV. On TV, there's a commercial for a product. So you're watching a character watch a commercial. Not the full commercial, otherwise it seems contrived, but you do see the product on TV.

I like what you wrote about the cult idea. I can name a few companies that do that: Apple, Google, Microsoft to a lesser extent, Valve, Rockstar, etc. They make you feel like part of a group, which is especially dangerous for people that haven't been part of a group before; so tech companies really like this strategy.

I went to a conference on a company selling 3D TV without glasses once. The company went under eventually, losing lots of investors' money *coughangryfacecough*. But they were saying how the 3D technology could be used in storefronts, so that when you walk through the mall, instead of seeing mannequins, you would see 3D images of people displaying the clothes. Maybe even walking beside you, since a 3D image's position is dependent on where the person seeing it is.
 

Je Hones

New member
Dec 9, 2009
31
0
0
This is all quite sick. Spotify has this system where there's adverts, but even if you turn down the volume, the advert stops and won't resume until you turn it up to an audible level.
 

Wicky_42

New member
Sep 15, 2008
2,468
0
0
I would probably just stop watching videos with ads. It's not worth watching a 2min youtube clip if I have to go through some bullshit advertising quicktime event. There's a reason I don't watch TV live, and I'm not going to make an exception for casual entertainment on the web.
 

NeutralDrow

New member
Mar 23, 2009
9,097
0
0
And here I thought this was about "Punch the Monkey, Win a Free IPod."

What you're talking about sounds far more annoying.
 

Mr Montmorency

New member
Jun 29, 2010
513
0
0
If ads were forced to tell the truth, I'd be more inclined to watch them.

For example, if Coca-Cola was to list the positives and negatives about their product, I'd be more inclined to watch it to see if the product is good for my business.

Sadly, people have short attention spans and are only interested if the ad is funny and "random", so now to get our attention they have to make us wipe away the germs from some clothes with Vanish Oxy Action.

I'm just saying, if they didn't patronise me every time they try and tell me about my product, I'd be more inclined to listen.
 

Yassen

New member
Apr 5, 2008
1,308
0
0
Mr Montmorency said:
If ads were forced to tell the truth, I'd be more inclined to watch them.

For example, if Coca-Cola was to list the positives and negatives about their product, I'd be more inclined to watch it to see if the product is good for my business.
That would certainly break the formula but no company would agree to do it. They want people to believe their product is the best option and will even resort to deceit to make you believe it.

An example would be from McDonalds. Here in Australia they claim their meat is "from 100% beef" and since they can't lie in advertisements that must be true right?

Wrong.

What if I told you there's a department at numerous meat factories that title themselves as "100% beef"? They do this just so McDonalds and other fast food joints can claim they're meat is from 100% beef without being deceitful, knowing how people will interpret the claim into exactly what they want you to believe. The meat isn't actually 100% beef, but they know that's exactly what you'll think since you don't know where they get their meat from. It's incredibly underhanded but not technically speaking, illegal.

I don't know whether I should applaud their genius or be terrified of it.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
Apple was considering forcing you to watch ads on ALL portable apple products with web access. Surfing the web? Interactive ads would pop up randomly. Making phone calls? The phone would actually INTERRUPT your conversation and force you to play around with the ad.

Obviously, this plan was never implemented. Can you imagine if it had?