Is Anonymous a terrorist group

Recommended Videos

RedRussian

New member
Jun 7, 2010
117
0
0
lemiel14n3 said:
Anonymous has always been, by it's very nature, difficult to pin down. More amorphous mass than actual group, there have been multiple acts attributed to the unnamed collective. From attacks on opponents of wikileaks [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/105954-Anonymous-Declares-Infowar-on-Wikileaks-Opponents] to the recent mailing of child pornography [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/107078-4chan-Member-Gets-Jail-Time-For-Sending-Dirty-Pics-To-School]. Anonymous' actions are varied, fulfilling purposes both noble and nefarious, as well as down right weird. The fact does reamin though that the majority, if not the entirety of their actions were illegal, regardless of intention. And governments all over have started paying attention to the actions of this surprisingly organized group. Action has already been taken [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/106549-FBI-Raids-Texas-Company-in-Hunt-for-Anonymous]

So tell me your opinion escapists, could anonymous be considered a terrorist organization? Are governments justified in pursuing the legion. Will they ever be successful?

No, just kids who don't know who guy fawkes really was, and think masks are cool.
 

userwhoquitthesite

New member
Jul 23, 2009
2,177
0
0
lemiel14n3 said:
Anonymous has always been, by it's very nature, difficult to pin down. More amorphous mass than actual group, there have been multiple acts attributed to the unnamed collective. From attacks on opponents of wikileaks [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/105954-Anonymous-Declares-Infowar-on-Wikileaks-Opponents] to the recent mailing of child pornography [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/107078-4chan-Member-Gets-Jail-Time-For-Sending-Dirty-Pics-To-School]. Anonymous' actions are varied, fulfilling purposes both noble and nefarious, as well as down right weird. The fact does reamin though that the majority, if not the entirety of their actions were illegal, regardless of intention. And governments all over have started paying attention to the actions of this surprisingly organized group. Action has already been taken [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/106549-FBI-Raids-Texas-Company-in-Hunt-for-Anonymous]

So tell me your opinion escapists, could anonymous be considered a terrorist organization? Are governments justified in pursuing the legion. Will they ever be successful?
I love Anonymous, and not just because it gives me an excuse to wear fun masks and shout at people for their religious beliefs.

Anonymous is a terrible fucking thing. But, it is also the face of the Internet. Everyone in the world is a selfless, evil, world-saving, out-for-themselves, crazy sort of person. And anon reflects that. Sure, the legion does terrible things. But they also are a self-regulating mass of people behaving in the most purely human manner ever concieved. They harass and attack, but when something goes too far, it usually ends pretty quickly. When someone does something wrong, they are punished. Granted, what anon decides is wrong is pretty much a flavor of the week sort of deal, but then most of society is as well. Anon polices itself. Child pornography is punished with banning, or law enforcement involvement. If the internet were countries, we would call a ban EXILE or DEPORTMENT.
In fact, Anonymous is damn near the best realization of communism ever to exist (the Federation notwithstanding, as Star Trek is fictional. Don't try to argue that point. I will win). A self-sustaining unit of human beings coexisting together according to their own rules and a vaguely-shared ideal. That is pretty much a WHOLE DAMN NATION. Just add geography.

So yeah, anon, keep making your racist jokes and heartfelt charitable misadventures. You are neutral humanity laid bare, and I would not have that change for all the security and politeness in the world.

I expect you to hold up your end of internet.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
Terrorism: The act of inspiring terror to achieve ones goals.

This is the simplified definition of course. But lets go through it.

Does Anon inspire TERROR? Fear? Are their mothers crying in the streets and children being taken out of school? No.

Bam, not terrorist.

And to those of you who seem to believe the GOAL is what defines a terrorist, try again. It is the method of achieving a goal. Someone could be using terrorism to get the government to build houses for the homeless and give more funding to the education system.

The GOAL does not make a terrorist, the METHOD does.
 

Dusk17

New member
Jul 30, 2010
178
0
0
Anonymous are a group of cyber terrorists. It doesnt matter if they have not hurt anyone or if not all of them have done anything, they are still a group associated with cyber terrorism.
 

Mr_Universal

New member
Jun 29, 2009
186
0
0
One thing people do that is wrong, is that they sometimes think 4chan = Anonymous. But from what I have been able to figure out, Anonymous does not support Child pornography, only the trolls on 4chan does, and note this, not everyone on 4chan are creeps, they are just random.
I would think of them as chaotic defenders of free-speech and the right to be anonymous on the internet. One thing I like about the REAL anonymous "members" (they don´t have members if I know them right, they have volunteers) is their opposition to for example the Westboro Baptist Church, which is a cult that promotes death of people, for example American soldiers in Irac, and for some stupid reason, us Swedes, as the will of god.

Feel free to correct me