Is anonymous going to rule the world?

[Anarchemitis]

They would never be able to control anything larger than their individual back yards; even though they form a superintelligence, it's not centralized enough to administrate a nation with current sovereignty models. Which is to say, they would have to create their own legal construct from the ground up in order to maintain any semblance of control.

 

[Ironic Pirate]

No. They don't want to rule the world, they want to complain about those that do.

 

[e2density]

Well, I have to say it's better than Fox News running the world.

 

[theriddlen]

Anonymous? They don't want someone to rule our world, internet, or deny our right to know. They (or maybe i should say 'we', as 'we Internet') understand that anarchy is the only way for the Internet, and all the efforts to limit us here are assault that should be repelled with blow that will make other retarded shitheads think twice before trying to invade us on our land.

 

[Twilight_guy]

No. Anonymous is an expression of suppressed emotions. The absolute freedom from repercussion allows people to act as they wish, and this leads to them acting in ways they wish to but can't in normal society. Suppressed emotion (like being a dick to people) get vented in a relatively safe space. This is not conducive to an organized organization though. Ont op of that, anonymity prevents leadership since its hard to get behind a person when nobody knows who he is. To some extent without a leader no group can do great things because it simply lacks the structure and direction. They may have some power but they're not going anywhere.

 

[Logic 0]

If they do we will finally defeat the weather proving we have beaten god.

 

[ragestreet]

I don't know but now I want to see what would happen if they did.

 

[Jack Skelhon]

No.

 

[kurupt87]

Rule it? That'd be bad; for us, them and everyone else.

Police it? That could work.

 

[Gemore]

Rule it? That'd be bad; for us, them and everyone else.

Police it? That could work.

This^

Seems more reasonable than ruling anyway.

 

[Gemore]

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/107893-Westboro-Baptists-Stage-Fake-Anonymous-Threat

" When Anonymous says we support free speech, we mean it. We count Beatrice Hall among our Anonymous forebears: 'I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.'" "

 

[pyramid head grape]

No because they would be too busy on world of warcraft and counter strike.