Is camping in Battlefield as bad as in CoD

Recommended Videos

Daddy Go Bot

New member
Aug 14, 2008
233
0
0
Yeah, because you're not benefiting your team by camping. Using motion sensors and your recon gear however will.
 

Zeema

The Furry Gamer
Jun 29, 2010
4,580
0
0
atm Camping is more just a Vary insult

i get called a camper for running around a Map with a RPK

i never Pitch the tent so to speak.

So no you will still get called 'CAMPER' but i think its more understandably because your protecting something
 

Snork Maiden

Snork snork
Nov 25, 2009
1,071
0
0
Juk3n said:
Aaron Glenn said:
Ok so I'm a CoD player but recently haven't been playing any because of campers.I blame leader boards and kill streaks. So with BF3 and MW3 coming out soon and since I know that both will be online oriented. I need to choose one. Now I know that BF has bigger maps but does that cut down on the number of people camping or is it about the same.
No camping isnt as bad in the 'greedy' sense but spawn blocking/camping reaches whole new levels in Battlefield, and imo since it is game breaking, it is worse.
I only just got this on Steam, but it seems to be 95% of the servers have anti-spawnkill measures of some kind in place. Of course I dunno if this is the case on consoles.

General_Potatoes said:
Too many snipers in battlefield. Or maybe it was just BC2. Thats my experince D:
Doesn't happen too often but squads full of Recon? Ughhh. The worst thing is that if everyone on one team goes Recon that team will always lose and almost certainly won't score well (either via actual score or KD) doing so.
 

monkey jesus

New member
Jan 29, 2009
135
0
0
You get a lot of snipers (wookies) hanging back and doing the team no good but camping just isn't as effective on BF. There are too many options to take them out, after a little while you'll find that a supportive squad is the key to doing well and it's really satisfying.

All working to an objective and supporting your team is a good experience and its a shared one.

That said if you play on hardcore the gameplay gets a bit static and camping pays off more so people use it. I'm usually a hardcore exponent (ahem) but in BF BC2 I find the standard mode much better.

The SASS servers are good, they have some rank restricted "noob" servers so you won't get cornholed by rank 50's all day long and its usually a good crowd.

I'll see you there :)


In other news, adverts in the captchas?! FFS!
 

Serving UpSmiles

New member
Aug 4, 2010
962
0
0
You can call it camping if you want, but to me it's defending. Also if any of those Snipers get on your nerves, just aim at them and spot them, and the snipers on your team will take them out no problem.
 

NLS

Norwegian Llama Stylist
Jan 7, 2010
1,594
0
0
You can spot enemy players for the rest of your team, and you have destructible buildings.
So even if a camper kills you, as long as you press your q button while targeting him, everyone else on your team will be able to see him, and can asily destroy his cover. You even get points for that kill, even if all you did was spot him.
 

ReaperGrimm

New member
Jun 2, 2011
172
0
0
somersetsaxon said:
There isn't as much camping in the way that you've run into on CoD. The most popular game modes tend to be ones involving capturing and holding an objective, so there is always some measure of people hanging around the objectives they hold to defend them. But there is always a way of dealing with them.
By " a way of dealing with them" he means blowing the wall the little prick is camping behind and disfiguring his dead body with bullets!
 

Caliostro

Headhunter
Jan 23, 2008
3,253
0
0
No idea to be honest. Less than CoD? Almost definitely. Pretty much every mechanic in CoD rewards camping. Will Battlefield be campy by its own accord? No idea.

Bad Company 2 is actually quite as anti-campy as you can get in this specific subgenre of shooter. It took a lot of very successful steps to ensure camping isn't a very "safe" strategy:

- Removed prone, so you can't just lie down and camp it out.
- Destructible scenarios mean hiding behind pretty much anything can suddenly turn on you. People can drop an entire house on you if you decide to camp the attic.
- Spawning system ensures a more tactical outlook of the battlefield. Less random "just spawned in the place you ran past 2 seconds ago. Eat a bullet" moments. More reward for movement.
- Objectives mean that there's something worth moving towards. And if you're camping people know where. Camping in an obscure part of the map doesn't win anyone any games.
- No "kill streak perks", along with the "objective" mechanic, reward team progress, and self-sacrifice for the team, as opposed to the individual defending his own kill streak by whatever means (i.e.: leaving everyone else to die).


That said, I know Battlefield 3 will have prone (+campiness), but will retain and in fact enhance the destruction (-campiness). Other than that, I don't know which mechanics it'll use, so...who knows.

Less campy than CoD I can almost certainly guarantee it will be though.
 

Mark Flanagan

New member
Apr 25, 2011
287
0
0
BF:BC2 plays much in a move up, hunker down, Capture objective, Kill some fools, move up, hunker down.... way. In this sense camping, as in defending an area, is perfectly fine.

And if at the end of the day you're struggling to wheedle out a squad from its emplacements around a objective then you just bring in the explosives and reduce said cover into a pile of debris.

I've also seen great use of one player hanging back and 'camping' in an area with good LOS and just spotting targets. When I have enough friends online playing to form a squad the Recon will throw his motion mines out ahead of us then take a position a couple hundred meters back from the objective and Spot enemies for us and give us early warnings for tanks/heli's. Works pretty well and in the event if all three of the 'fighters' die then we can spawn on him and get back in the fight.

So yes, camping is useful. You just need to know when to do it and when to move up.
 

Michailov

New member
Oct 15, 2009
64
0
0
Campin in BF?

I thought we had Tanks, Hellies, Drones, ReconBios, Tubes, Lawnchairs and Nades for that.

Campin in a house? Tank says; What house?
Campin in a tower? Tank yells: TIMBERRRRRRR!

I say that the only campin that you notice is due to bad leveldesign
(That Giant lighthosue in BC2Viet)
 

Appleshampoo

New member
Sep 27, 2010
377
0
0
I find Camping perfectly fine BF. For example, in Battlefield playing a sniper means you actually get to snipe. None of that Snipe from 5 feet away (LOL QUICKSCOPE) bullshit you find in CoD. The maps are big, so you if you want to play a sniper well you pick a good spot and stick to it for as long as you can before getting found out.

In CoD you just run and shoot people since the maps are so small sniping is useless. Even more so when the pistol is just as accurate as a sniper rifle.
 

thick doona

New member
Jul 11, 2011
82
0
0
Snipers camp as part of their strategy. Camouflage is a big deal. But they're really not that hard to kill or just avoid.

Most buildings will fall down on top of you if they're not objective critical.

Add this to the 'spotting' thing and camping becomes part of the game which requires skill to master, instead of hindering gameplay. /imo