Ummmmm, as a mathematician myself, I have to disagree with you. If it wasn't for numbers (that humans apparently 'invented'), then you wouldn't be sitting at a computer reading this now, nor would you have been able to type your message. Here's a quick example as to the base importance of numbers. You have two ears. Now, you can argue as much as you like that people invented that number, and that's true, but it doesn't change the universal fact that you still have a fixed amount of ears. The number 'two' is simply a term that we came up with to describe that fixed amount, it doesn't affect the amount in any way. Numbers may be invented by humans, but only as a way to describe universal constants and rules. So your point is invalid.Alandoril said:I hate mathematicians. Granted numbers have their essential uses, but the idea that you can sum up the origin of the universe with a stream of numbers that mankind invented (they're NOT universal constants, merely arbitrary frames of reference) is frankly arrogant and absurd.
Oh, and if you bother to do any research into modern science or maths then you will find that your comment about summing up the origin of the universe with numbers is also false, because that's exactly what scientists are doing right now. And as I say, that's because numbers are in fact universal constants, not just arbitrary reference frames...
Anyway, back on topic. Fine, I study maths. My younger brother wants to do History at university. And having studied history at school (and still having an interest to this day in the subject) I can safely say that both are equally important. The only real difference is that they are important in different ways and fields of study. It's like comparing cheese to apples. Both are tasty, but in different ways, and any further comparison is just pointless and illogical...