Is it a bad thing that...

[Steve Dark]

Just now, surfing round facebook I saw this ad on a side banner that was for some animal charity. It was saying that some tigers needed my help, and tried to get me to sponsor them by showing me a clip of a mummy tiger and a baby tiger looking all cute and cuddly. To make their point they had a sniper reticule, probably supposed to be from some poachers or something, hovering menacingly over the Mum tiger's head.

Is it a bad thing that the first thing I thought was "Headshot! 10 Points! "?

 

[klc0100]

No I would of thought the same.
But sadly I cant see this thread going to well.

 

[Lord George]

We must kill the tigers before they turn against us, do your duty for humanity!. But does this thread have any point to it?

 

[a7r0p05]

Knocks dockity box?

 

[PureChaos]

i always thought head-shots were more than 10 points!

 

[Ace of Spades]

*New challenges available*

 

[fluffylandmine]

Whenever I see a reticule on anything I think "Boom! Head-shot!".

 

[sky14kemea]

its not a bad thing
its probably the second thing i would've thought after "oh, its like Bambi in tiger form "

 

[samsprinkle]

The best way to kill the rasberry laden foe is the tiger. The advantage of the tiger is that it not only eats the rasberry laden foe, but also the rasberries, rendering your opponent disarmed.

 

[PirateKing]

I tend to have a sinisterly morbid sense of humor sometimes as well. I love tigers though...I'm not sure if I would think that...Keep in mind this is coming from a guy who laughed like a deranged clown all the way through Schindlers List.

 

[JohnneyLightning]

There's nothing wrong with that. If they wanted to be taken seriosuly, they wouldn't have made something so easy to make fun of.