chadachada123 said:
I truly question your reading comprehension. I'm not talking about MYSELF having sex with freshmen here. Besides, the law has nothing to do with this, since some states have exemptions in the law making sex among minors legal if they're within several years of each other.
Right, look at it this way: you were ~16, and unsettled by the idea of an 18 year old guy with a 14 year old girl. That's fine. But that opinion is only supposed to change in the sense that among older people, a four year difference doesn't matter much. It's not supposed to make a highschool senior dating a girl a couple months out of the eighth grade retroactively non-creepy.
chadachada123 said:
Regarding fat chicks, again, maybe you should learn to read before posting an attack on it.
Funny, that: the more you clarify, the more I'm convinced that I simply didn't fathom how disturbing the previous posts were.
chadachada123 said:
I contend that, as long as I make it clear that I'm not in it for a relationship, there is nothing wrong with casual sex, and I would like to experience said casual sex with a wide variety of people.
Jesus Christ. You've managed to make casual sex sound like it requires a checklist.
And at any rate, do you see anything at all potentially wrong with telling a girl, "I want to fuck you because you're fat, and then I'm leaving"? Especially with this case, you're looking to screw someone with something that's likely a source of insecurity
solely because of that thing. That's only a few steps above adding to the list: "Note to self: sleep with a girl who says I remind her of her deceased father."
Look, man, even with casual sex, you should only be there if you actually have interest in what's happening. And I don't mean romantic interest, just
an interest that's stronger than "I've never done this before." I've never had sex with an amputee, but I'm not going to do it simply because I've never done it before.
chadachada123 said:
This includes fat chicks, skinny chicks, tall chicks, black chicks, what-have-you. There is nothing wrong about wanting casual sex, nor is there anything wrong with wanting to explore and experiment with people of a diverse background.
I don't consider myself prudish. But this...it isn't anything like promiscuity. This is the most cold and clinical approach to sex I've ever heard. This is "sexual experimentation" in the most horrifying and literal sense of the term.
chadachada123 said:
Now, apparently I have to reiterate this since you didn't read it the first several times, but I IN NO WAY SAID THAT I WAS LOOKING TO HAVE SEX WITH A 14 YEAR OLD.
But you somehow now approve of sex with 14 year olds by 18 year olds, despite disapproving of it when you were younger. As far as getting lessons completely wrong, it's like reading "Little Red Riding Hood" and learning that even if you're almost suicidally immune to obvious visual clues, a burly woodsman will rescue you from your own stupidity.
chadachada123 said:
I would like to, if possible, have sex with a virgin, like with the fat chick, etc.
*sigh* Alright, let me try and make my point clear: you're targeting an unrealistic demographic. Maybe you had a shot at it in highschool, but you're halfway through college, and by now, it's practically out of the question.
I won't deny that there aren't still virgins, quite the contrary. It's just that by college, the overwhelming majority of them will either be A) saving themselves for marriage, so sex is out of the question or B) not necessarily saving it for marriage, but have held off this long and probably won't have sex with a guy who outright says he only wants to deflower them.
Think about it: how many girls are there willing to have casual, one-night sex with a guy who only wants her because she a virgin? I'll tell you where most of them are: freshman and sophomore year of highschool.
chadachada123 said:
Additionally, I AM NOT SEEKING OUT THESE PARTNERS. There is a massive difference, and if you understood the English language or at least read my other posts you would see this, between "I prefer virgins" or "I seek out virgins" and "I'd like to have sex with, among other groups, a virgin someday."
...what? How does that match with your previous statements? Ones made in this same post, no less? The ones about telling people beforehand that you have no intention of starting any sort of relationship besides a one-night stand? Do you make this proposition as soon as you meet them, or do you bring it up at a later date? "Hey, I can't help but notice that you're black/fat/a virgin...I've always wanted to fuck one of those. Want to help me out?"
chadachada123 said:
Are you ready to stop throwing ad hominems and other fallacies around?
Maybe you're looking at a different definition of ad hominem, but I don't think it means what you think it does.
An ad hominem argument is one that calls your claims into question using an assertion unrelated to the issue at hand. For instance, if I called your opinions on this matter into question on the basis that you had massive credit card debt,
that would be an ad hominem argument. Whether or not you're financially responsible is completely irrelevant to this issue.
Though you mention that I'm guilty of using other fallacies, in addition to your (completely incorrect) assertion that I was resorting to ad hominem. Any chance you could list a few of them?