I'm not sure what you're arguing. Nothing is being 'impressed upon' the industry. There's no board or committee that requires a game to have 'X value of female representation'. And no one is asking for that. All of these critiques, discussions, and 'lectures' are completely optional in their consumption.Sleekit said:that may well all be true but it doesn't have to be overrepresented by the feminists highlighted in the ongoing saga.senordesol said:No, feminists don't need to step off of 'our' hobby (whatever that means). Critique and introspection is how art evolves. It's how you make better artists.
No one is coming to take your games away. No one is going to castrate Call of Duty. The worst -the absolute WORST- that will happen long-term, is that developers will think just a little longer about the roles of female characters in their games.
Oh the horror.
"gaming" doesn't need genuinely radical societal views impressed upon it from the outside by some clique especially given the fact it moderately leans that way anyway.
representations of women in gaming (for example) are regularly taken to task by member of this very forum and in other forums across the net.
what exists "in game and online" is a actually completely different.
and people don't go looking for gaming websites to be lectured on matters socio-political that sound like something for collage campus activists meeting.
there's a reason "the mainstream" is "moderate".
because most people are.
this isn't really about "Feminism".
If you don't want to be a part of it, you don't have to be.