Is it time for feminists to step off our hobby?

Recommended Videos

Jesterscup

New member
Sep 9, 2014
267
0
0
Guerilla said:
Strawman #45874. Once again feminists pretend to represent all women so if you criticize feminism it means that you hate women. Welcome to third-wave feminism folks, where women are represented by feminism whether they like it or not and the critics are all women-hating bastards.
I seriously have to agree with this. But wait there more...

so even if you agree and you're a guy, you're not allowed to do that,you sexist, daring to agree.

Being trans and identifying as female ( or male for that matter ) and agreeing, you're still a guy you sexist !

Pointing out that a feminist argument can also apply to those who aren't female, that makes you a sexist for pointing out hypocrisy, because "you can't understand what it's like, you're not a woman, it's not the same"

I can point to several examples of these, and not isolated incidents. [rant]The last one boils my blood.... [/rant]

The Irony here, is that by promoting these extreme voices, the moderates, and those that agree and would fight the good fight are marginalised & excluded. They are actually harming their agenda and the goals they strive for, goals which, at heart, I think most of us can agree are noble in spirit.

Irony no.2 I wouldn't be at all surprised if Guerilla considered me to be a "feminist poster"

--------------------------
I wonder how many "girl gamers" identify as feminists? the title suggests that these are 2 distinct groups with no crossover, no agreement or common ground, but it that the case?
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
Guerilla said:
But it is. He used my post as proof to accuse us that we rage against women something I didn't do anywhere in my posts. He basically changed the content of my post from feminists to women which is a strawman. And it has happened at least three times from different feminist posters the last 2-3 days iirc.
I don't really care what he's done before, that post you quoted is not a straw man. He's most definitely attacking your position. You can argue that he is misunderstanding your position on the issue (although to be fair, Guerilla, I've read your posts and I don't think he's too far off base, so if you think you're being treated unfairly here part of the blame lies in how you are presenting your POV). But he's not propping up an exaggeration of your argument and then tearing it down. He's just making a statement.
 

Grahav

New member
Mar 13, 2009
1,129
0
0
AkaDad said:
Grahav said:
Okay, fair.

What about games like Dead or Alive, Dragon's Crown and the people who play them? What do you think?
I've never played those games, but as general statement, I'd say people should play the games they like.

I have to leave, but if you have more specifics questions, I'll respond to them later tonight.
Okay, cool. :)

A question. There is an argument that there is a lot of feminist branches.

In accord to wikipedia.

Movements and ideologies (main article) Amazon Analytical Anarchist Atheist Black Chicana Christian Conservative Cultural Cyber Difference Eco Equality Equity Fat French feminism theory French structuralist Gender Global Individualist Islamic Jewish Lesbian Liberal Lipstick Marxist Material Neo New Postcolonial Postmodern Poststructural Pro-life Proto Radical Separatist Sex-positive Socialist Standpoint Third world Trans Transnational Womanism

So basically...

What is the relationship between the branches like? In a general way, they criticize one another, they ignore what each other say, they collude together, how is it?

And what is the bare minimum to a person be considered feminist? What ties all these groups to them be classified as feminists?

Edit: Feel free to point me at any article you find relevant.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
Grahav said:
And what is the bare minimum to a person be considered feminist?
Belief that men and women are equal, and deserve equal consideration based on their merits as individuals.

Grahav said:
What ties all these groups to them be classified as feminists?
Fucked if I know. That's a lot of groups. Generally speaking anyone can say "I am a feminist", just like anyone can say "I am a Marxist". Doesn't make it true. In the world as I know it, if someone claims to be an adherent of X philosophy, whilst demonstrating none of that philosophy's tenets, we say "You are not an adherent of X". With feminism, we say "Feminist has been forever tainted!". It's a curious phenomenon.

But yeah third wave feminism is primarily concerned with self-criticism. You'd have a hard time finding a group of third wave feminists who all agreed on any particular issue. Which is why attempts to blanket-critique "feminists" as though they were a hive mind that spoke with one voice and acted with one purpose are so hilarious.
 

Jesterscup

New member
Sep 9, 2014
267
0
0
Grahav said:
And what is the bare minimum to a person be considered feminist? What ties all these groups to them be classified as feminists?
I can't answer the rest, but just like most loose collections with a primary stand-point, yes they do criticise each other, ignore each other, and sometimes collude together.

the definition of a feminist is as follows :

A feminist advocates or supports the rights and equality of women.

Thats pretty much as defined as it can be. However some of the 'branches' have stricter definitions
 

Guerilla

New member
Sep 7, 2014
253
0
0
BloatedGuppy said:
Guerilla said:
But it is. He used my post as proof to accuse us that we rage against women something I didn't do anywhere in my posts. He basically changed the content of my post from feminists to women which is a strawman. And it has happened at least three times from different feminist posters the last 2-3 days iirc.
I don't really care what he's done before, that post you quoted is not a straw man. He's most definitely attacking your position. You can argue that he is misunderstanding your position on the issue (although to be fair, Guerilla, I've read your posts and I don't think he's too far off base, so if you think you're being treated unfairly here part of the blame lies in how you are presenting your POV). But he's not propping up an exaggeration of your argument and then tearing it down. He's just making a statement.
Of course you don't think he's far off the base, you basically agree with him on everything.

My position is against feminism not against women. He's attacking an imaginary position he concocted to shame people from criticizing feminists.
 

Grahav

New member
Mar 13, 2009
1,129
0
0
BloatedGuppy said:
Grahav said:
And what is the bare minimum to a person be considered feminist?
Belief that men and women are equal, and deserve equal consideration based on their merits as individuals.
Equal in regards of, what? Law, biology, psychologicall...?

"and deserve equal consideration based on their merits as individuals"

'kay

Grahav said:
What ties all these groups to them be classified as feminists?
Fucked if I know. That's a lot of groups. Generally speaking anyone can say "I am a feminist", just like anyone can say "I am a Marxist". Doesn't make it true. In the world as I know it, if someone claims to be an adherent of X philosophy, whilst demonstrating none of that philosophy's tenets, we say "You are not an adherent of X". With feminism, we say "Feminist has been forever tainted!". It's a curious phenomenon.

But yeah third wave feminism is primarily concerned with self-criticism. You'd have a hard time finding a group of third wave feminists who all agreed on any particular issue. Which is why attempts to blanket-critique "feminists" as though they were a hive mind that spoke with one voice and acted with one purpose are so hilarious.
Right.

Okay, it is not a hive mind. But for which directions the movement, maybe not as a whole, but for the most part, is going? If it is just a mess of different opinions why bother?

Also, it is okay for a person to not want to be considered a feminist?
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
Guerilla said:
Of you don't think he's far off the base, you basically agree with him on everything.
I do? I have absolutely no idea what he had to say. In fact, I haven't really taken much of a formal position on anything in this thread that I can remember off hand. Can you demonstrate some of the similarities in our perspectives so I know what you're referring to?

Guerilla said:
My position is against feminism not against women.
That's fine. It's just...you know...a pretty specific thing to have an issue with. And a pretty all encompassing thing to have an issue with. Note you don't say "I have an issue with specific people who claim to be feminists" or "I don't like what person A had to say about B", you are "AGAINST FEMINISM". That's actually a fairly problematic stance, chum, at least from an outside perspective.

Guerilla said:
He attacking an imaginary position he concocted to shame people from criticizing feminists.
You don't think there are rage issues within the gaming community? Or that there are elements within the community that have issues with women?

Note the use of the words "Within the community", as opposed to "the community". He's saying there are problematic elements inside the community.

Whereas you are "Against Feminism".

Remember earlier in the thread, when I pointed out how the way you express yourself exactly mirrors all the things you purport to oppose? Here's another opportunity for you to reflect on that.
 

carnex

Senior Member
Jan 9, 2008
828
0
21
BloatedGuppy said:
Grahav said:
And what is the bare minimum to a person be considered feminist?
Belief that men and women are equal, and deserve equal consideration based on their merits as individuals.
Person has to self identify as feminist to be considered feminist. Person has to self identify ans member of any group that has voluntary membership to be considered member of that group. Anything else would be violation of person's right for self-determination since every person has freedom of association and disassociation.

Only exception would be in the court of law where after determining persons actions one can be said to be associated with a group that he performed actions with or in coordination with that group.
 

Montezuma's Lawyer

New member
Nov 5, 2011
324
0
0
fem·i·nism
noun \ˈfe-mə-ˌni-zəm\

: the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities

: organized activity in support of women's rights and interests


Now I sit and wait for someone to say that the second definition overrides and cancels out the first.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
Grahav said:
Equal in regards of, what? Law, biology, psychologicall...?

"and deserve equal consideration based on their merits as individuals"

'kay
In questions of equality we are most generally addressing legal considerations, yes? As well as general societal outlook. People can campaign all they want to be "equal" biologically but it's not going to help me bear children or bench press like a champion.

Grahav said:
Right.

Okay, it is not a hive mind. But for which directions the movement, maybe not as a whole, but for the most part, is going? If it is just a mess of different opinions why bother?
Philosophy, Science, pretty much any branch of human thought ever, in the history of the world, has been "a mess of different opinions". Yet, we continued to bother. Silly, I know.

Grahav said:
Also, it is okay for a person to not want to be considered a feminist?
Of course. People can identify however they want.

carnex said:
Person has to self identify as feminist to be considered feminist. Person has to self identify ans member of any group that has voluntary membership to be considered member of that group. Anything else would be violation of person's right for self-determination since every person has freedom of association and disassociation.

Only exception would be in the court of law where after determining persons actions one can be said to be associated with a group that he performed actions with or in coordination with.
If you consider association with terms that you fit the general description of are a violation of your right to self-determination, that is your prerogative.
 

deadish

New member
Dec 4, 2011
694
0
0
Mandalore_15 said:
deadish said:
Mandalore_15 said:
OMG this so much. I wish I was as articulate as you.

Hope you don't mind me linking your post to explain my position in other threads and forums.
Not at all. I'm glad you liked it, most people have reacted pretty badly I'm afraid. :(
Overall it comes down to artistic freedom (i.e. freedom of speech) and people "jumping to conclusions" with little to no data backing it.

We have been down this road before with "violence in video games".

Ironically, IMHO, this sort of "babying" of women, that they have to be protected from "negative" representation in artistic works via social pressure, is itself sexist in a way. Men have been portrayed in all sorts of ways in the media and no one gives a damn.

PS: Here is the thing, it's OK to ask for more "positive" representation of women in games BUT censorship of "negative" representations is crossing a very dangerous line.
 

carnex

Senior Member
Jan 9, 2008
828
0
21
Montezuma said:
fem·i·nism
noun \ˈfe-mə-ˌni-zəm\

: the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities

: organized activity in support of women's rights and interests


Now I sit and wait for someone to say that the second definition overrides and cancels out the first.
Why would one say that. It can lead to that, but it's not causal. Following one does not automatically lead to violating the other although one can see clear conflict of interest between those statements.
 

eberhart

New member
Dec 20, 2012
94
0
0
Grahav said:
What is the relationship between the branches like? In a general way, they criticize one another, they ignore what each other say, they collude together, how is it?

And what is the bare minimum to a person be considered feminist? What ties all these groups to them be classified as feminists?
I know!

They are like... "gamers" ;)


Yeah, yeah, doing something for the oppressed and fighting the injustice is "better" and incomparable with gaming and I should be ashamed. Pretend I threw in slacktivists and other kind of "social media feminists" too then :)
 

Guerilla

New member
Sep 7, 2014
253
0
0
BloatedGuppy said:
Yes, BloatedGuppy, I'm against feminism as in modern feminism that has become a mix of tumblr insanity, Sarkeesian victim complex/profiteering, kotaku clickbaiting manufactured controversies and Jezebel hypocrisy. This is your movement now and why many of you complain and stigmatize everyone and everything that doesn't obey the dogma. If there's some frustration against this monstrosity I'm fine with it tbh.

Admittedly there's a minority that definitely isn't like that but we can't ignore how ridiculous the movement has become because of that minority. Maybe they should organize and self-identify as rational or sex-positive feminists or something.
 

nuclearday

New member
Sep 24, 2009
35
0
0
Reading through this thread, it's kind of a microcosm that illustrates the problems with even discussing this issue in the first place, isn't it?

It's kind of hard to even find a route into the ongoing discussion because it's characterized by a marked focus on broad generalizations and hyperbole.

I can't respond to comments of "all feminists want such-and-such" because there's no rational response to hyperbole like that. As well it's kind of impossible to have a rational debate against someone who wants to go down the "you're a sexist if you disagree with me." The ante keeps getting raised and I often feel like there's avenue for me to enter the conversation unless I also respond like a caricature of a misrepresented ideology.
Mandalore_15 said:
As to the meat of your comment, I agree with what you're saying in theory, but in practice I think it is unlikely to work. Feminists that are active online more-often-than-not attempt to shut down any form of debate by categorising anything but complete agreement with them as misogyny or enabling things such as "the patriarchy" or "rape culture". I for one would love to properly debate a feminist about the depiction of women in videogames, but there don't seem to be many who would share my interest.
Fair enough. I can't speak for all of feminism or make claims to represent them. But I can tell you some of my view as a feminist, at least.

Personally, I don't own a ton of games that I feel have "rampant" sexism in them. I wasn't particularly offended at Red Dead Redemption for having a cheeky achievement for tying up a woman and leaving them on the train tracks to get run over. I don't think every time a female character has boobs that it's sexist, either. In fact, I think it's a very positive thing for anyone of any gender or orientation to be comfortable with (and proud of) their sexuality.

As far as equality in gaming, I think it's more a matter of representation than quantity. I'm not offended if every game doesn't stack up to some sort of quota for the proper ratio of male to female characters. I can play a game with all male characters just fine (though it does help if it makes sense for there to be no female characters at all...)

I do think if Ubisoft were thinking about it a little more, they probably could have thrown in some female characters for the multiplayer parts of the next Assassin's Creed game. But I'm also not planning on doing much multiplayer with that game, anyway (though I do play a lot of AC.) And their games have generally had some very well-written representations of women in their games, I thought.

Feminists get a bad rap and I do think some of that blame lies on faulty communication and a real lack of leadership. If feminism in gaming had a clear message to get across and a concise mission statement to follow, that would help a lot more than anything in clearing up a lot of the confusion surrounding it.

Hell, I'm a guy myself. I just think women ought to be treated equally within my favorite hobby. I'll point out poor representations of women when I come across them, and I think a lot of people could do better by bringing more attention to positive portrayals, too (personally I think the majority of the focus should be on positive rather than negative examples.)

I don't even think all games need to pass some sort of "feminist inquisition" before being released. There's "allowed" to be sexist games and games that portray women poorly. But I don't think it's controversial to say that probably should be the exception and not the rule. Really, I think the divide is about just where the bar should be set and whether we've reached it or not yet.

For myself, I think the goal of a world where this isn't an issue is just something to strive for. The same way that I think it's valuable to criticize games for poor writing and lazy narrative, in general.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
Guerilla said:
Yes, BloatedGuppy, I'm against feminism as in modern feminism that has become a mix of tumblr insanity, Sarkeesian victim complex/profiteering, kotaku clickbaiting manufactured controversies and Jezebel hypocrisy.
So you're against specific instances of insanity on Tumblr (Tumblr is a pretty broad website with a lot of stuff...seems to be mostly pictures of food and cats to me), Sarkeesian (for whom you have engineered a "victim complex", which would require personal knowledge of her psychological state...rather than just criticizing things you have evidence for, such as her sloppy research), Kotaku (don't think you'll get a lot of argument there), and incidences of hypocrisy on Jezebel.

You throw a blanket over all of it, call it "feminism", and declare yourself against it. All the while campaigning against hypocrisy and generalizations, which is...you'll have to pardon me...deeply, deeply hilarious. In a "you couldn't make this shit up if you tried" sense.

Guerilla said:
This is your movement now and why many of you complain and stigmatize everyone and everything that doesn't obey the dogma.
Deeply, deeply hilarious. There's certainly some dogma at play here, I'll give you that.

Guerilla said:
Admittedly there's a minority that definitely isn't like that but we can't ignore how ridiculous the movement has become because of that minority. Maybe they should organize and self-identify as rational or sex-positive feminists or something.
It's a minority, is it? Can I see your statistics please? How long did you run your study for? How large or small is the minority? I'm very interested in seeing the data you used to arrive at this conclusion, it should make excellent fodder for discussion. Good work.
 

Netrigan

New member
Sep 29, 2010
1,924
0
0
eberhart said:
Grahav said:
What is the relationship between the branches like? In a general way, they criticize one another, they ignore what each other say, they collude together, how is it?

And what is the bare minimum to a person be considered feminist? What ties all these groups to them be classified as feminists?
I know!

They are like... "gamers" ;)


Yeah, yeah, doing something for the oppressed and fighting the injustice is "better" and incomparable with gaming and I should be ashamed. Pretend I threw in slacktivists and other kind of "social media feminists" too then :)
I was comparing them to Doctor Who fandom earlier.

There are some major political feminist groups, but I'm not sure gamers are bumping heads with any of them. In my experience, they tend to be focused more on reproductive rights, health care, day care, maternity leave, and the like. Gamers are going up against the academics and Pop Culture ones. They are for all practical purposes gamers and Doctor Who fans. They're taken a bit more seriously because they speak to wider issues, but break it down they're complaining about Bungie nerfing the pistol.
 

carnex

Senior Member
Jan 9, 2008
828
0
21
BloatedGuppy said:
carnex said:
Person has to self identify as feminist to be considered feminist. Person has to self identify ans member of any group that has voluntary membership to be considered member of that group. Anything else would be violation of person's right for self-determination since every person has freedom of association and disassociation.

Only exception would be in the court of law where after determining persons actions one can be said to be associated with a group that he performed actions with or in coordination with.
If you consider association with terms that you fit the general description of are a violation of your right to self-determination, that is your prerogative.
I take freedom of association and disassociation really seriously. I don't know how volatile is the society you live in, but here you can get in whole lot of trouble and emergency room just by being associated with wrong group. Not to mention loosing life.

Look up Bruce Taton and it might explain my position better (french football fan who died from injuries inflicted by local football hooligans)

Yes, MRAs and Feminists are not seriously physical but it's the matter of principle to me.

Also if you don't mind being associated with group based on how people perceive your beliefs, is it your right to push that same position onto others?
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
carnex said:
I take freedom of association and disassociation really seriously.
Evidently, yes.

carnex said:
I don't know how volatile is the society you live in, but here you can get in whole lot of trouble and emergency room just by being associated with wrong group. Not to mention loosing life.
Losing, Mr. President.

I live in Canada. It's about as not volatile as a society can get, but I'm sorry to hear about your circumstances.

carnex said:
Yes, MRAs and Feminists are not seriously physical but it's the matter of principle to me.
That's fine, I was genuine. I don't share your outrage on the subject but if matters of association and disassociation matter that much to you I'm happy to respect that. It's no skin off my nose.