That's true, which I suppose makes it a moot point. I'd rather have the physical UMD - I reckon they're pretty sturdy. I mean, I've owned a PSP for about 3 years now and none of my UMDs have broken. Admittedly, I take care of my games, and I've never lost any of the few digital copies I own either. Still, it's like with other physical vs. digital mediums - I'll always prefer owning the physical.deadish said:Well, you can lose/break UMDs too you know. Your PSP will break sooner or later - everything breaks sooner or later. Having to looking for replacements or fixes for an "out of production" product seem like a lot of (avoidable) trouble.
Being able to play your PSP games on your PSV seem like a pretty nice thing to have too, bigger screen, 2nd analog stick and all.
If I were to buy a PSP now, I would go full digital. I don't see any down side to be honest. Not to mention they will run better (faster loading) and are easier on the battery.
I reckon there will still be support and parts for PSPs for a while now as well. They're fragile things if you don't take care of them properly, so there will still be a small market for parts. It does sound like hassle, that's true, but we have no idea what the support will be like for the Vita yet - for all we know it may well be poor, which would moot this point as well.
You're right in saying that the advantages of the Vita - i.e., bigger screen, dual analog support (although, that's only on selected games, by the sound of it) - will be nice advantages, but that's never really sold it for me.
I think the main downside to going digital now is that PSP game prices for digital copies will still be higher than physical copies. Physical copies can come at dirt-cheap prices, especially if you're willing to buy pre-owned, and with the Vita being as expensive as it is, I think it's worth trying to save as much money as you can.