Is Mario done for?

Recommended Videos

Roger T. Houston

New member
Nov 20, 2008
15
0
0
Phew, what is up with the Mario-bashing??

The Mario games aren't that bad. They aren't stagnant either, as some are saying.. The whole "random" gravity thing was quite inventive (although the cameraman still should be keelhauled). A lot of people just dislikes it since it's mainstream.. It would be far down on my personal favorites list, but not as much that it advocates to kill the franchise.. A lot of people seem to think that just because a franchise has gone on to long, and that the latest installment wasn't the very best game ever, should be put to sleep (ZP had some of this mentality in his Nintendo-bashing episode (Zelda? Mario? I forget..))

Consider the CEO (or whatever) of Coca-Cola Inc. making this statement:
"We have decided to discontinue the Coca-Cola soft drink. We know a lot of people regulary buys this product, and that it is well liked among a lot of target groups, and that this is the largest source of income to the corporation, and a pillar of who we are, however we believe the product has become stagnant. In addition, there are some fancy wine-connoisseurs that feel the product is low-class."

Yeah, not gonna happen.
There is a long way from best game ever, to bad. The Mario games are not bad, they may not be what I/You/Anyone, like best, but as long as they aren't outright bad, Nintendo has my endorsment to continue to make them. (And I'm sure they value that..)
 

Vortex Traveller

New member
Sep 28, 2008
118
0
0
I'm not sure whats wrong with Mario, I really enjoyed Galaxy sure it didn't blow the Mario formula apart but why would it need to? Sonic is proof that taking a classic loved formula that works and attempting to update it is not always a good idea. Games companies are sometimes put in a vice, they try innovation and people complain its gimmicky or doesn't work and betrays all that was liked about what it used to be where if they stick with a formula that people like and that works people complain its too samey and that they want to see innovation. If Mario started being innovative and changed the gameplay there would be a thread called "Is Mario Done For?" and people on it would talk about how they hated Mario's new game as Nintendo destroyed the classic formula and took away everything that made Mario great.
 

Vortex Traveller

New member
Sep 28, 2008
118
0
0
If you mean me, no offence taken, I've just seen all too often a francise will be accused of not changing then people will then moan the changes don't work. Its just like how Sonic was great until they started adding gimmicks like Werehogs and Guns in a quest for innovation, the formula worked well when it was just running fast though levels of bad guys and across jumps and hoops. I'd prefer them to keep Mario more or less how it is (cutting down on the amount of spinoffs his in) but also work on more new franchises (The last new Nintendo innovative franchise I recall was Pikmin unless you count the Wii-Games line sports,music etc)
 

The Stabilo Boss

New member
Oct 11, 2008
52
0
0
The Mario franchise seems stale to a lot of veteran gamers, it's true. However, the Wii is pulling in an unprecedented number of new gamers, and many of them have never played a Mario game before. Nintendo have to keep making Mario games to get these new gamers addicted, as well as pleasing die-hard fans of the series. As long as Nintendo continue to draw in new gamers, I see no reason for them to stop making these games.

Oh, and SMG was awesome ^_^
 

glowstick

New member
Dec 7, 2008
23
0
0
most of the hardcore Mario fans that I have spoken to and I have interviewed claim that it was in their opinion terrible
Yeah, red light there; no one who would talk about Nintendo and claim to be hardcore, especially in that combination, should be credible to be spoken to. I could hardly tolerate seeing a "hardcore" Zelda or Smash Bros. fan bitching about how they weren't as good as they used to be every time, let alone imagine a "hardcore" Mario fan.
 

-Seraph-

New member
May 19, 2008
3,753
0
0
Like all good selling franchises there is no reason to end something if it makes money and is still quite popular. This can be applied to games, books, movies, ect.. it doesn't matter. If it continues to draw new players in and entertain many there is no reason why it should end. The veteran players are simply being selfish the way i see it, just because it seems old and stale for them. They overlook the fact that in this industry you must draw in new players of all ages and of the sort. Yes some franchises should end before they over due it but others are simply too versatile that they can keep making more. Once something stops making money THEN there is no reason to continue it unless you practically reinvent it. I am really getting sick of people complaining about long and well established franchises just because they "grew out of them" while others still enjoy and it continues to bring in to fans.
 

SBoggart

New member
Jul 2, 2008
62
0
0
He's dead on the inside. As long as he is profitable, though, they will continue to use the combination of plastic surgery, wigs, prosthetic bones and hackneyed material to keep him going. I actually heard they carved his tear ducts out so he can't cry anymore at night.
 

megapenguinx

New member
Jan 8, 2009
3,865
0
0
I personally think Mario is great, but as a mascot. As a platformer he should be retired and they should find someone new and just as lovable.
I doubt that he will retired anytime soon though
 

Johninator712

New member
Aug 10, 2008
140
0
0
I just thought about this. Mario was one of the biggest hits in gaming history. EVER. I understand that the franchise is going down hill... I just realized this depresses me horribly. I will be really upset if my kids won't even know who Mario is.

Wow. I hope that day will never come. I agree totally that the newer games haven't been prime, or even remotely good. But I think he'll come out of that funk, he always does.
 

Sylocat

Sci-Fi & Shakespeare
Nov 13, 2007
2,122
0
0
Ranooth said:
darrinwright said:
RAWKSTAR said:
I swear Im the only one who still enjoys Mario games... Galaxy was kickass.
You're not alone. Stand firm. Galaxy rocked.
We need jackets!!
Hear here. And I'm willing to bet that half of the people in this thread who are clamoring for Mario's demise have never actually played Galaxy.
 

PumpItUp

Senior Member
Sep 27, 2008
431
0
21
There is one of two solutions to this (possibly non-existant) problem.

First, a Mario/other Nintendo series (probably Zelda) crossover, Brawl notwithstanding.

Second, make the ULTIMATE Mario game, combining elements from every TRUE (read: non-spinoff) game Mario was involved in.

Imagine: Mario alongside Geno, Mallow, Goombella, the Pixls, and Luigi as they battle the nefarious evil eminating from the dark world that was Smithy's home world, as they are aided by Princess Peach, Yoshi, Rosalina, and Prof. E. Gadd and impeded by Bowser, Bowser Jr., Birdo, Wart, and the X-Nauts.

There should be platforming elements from the original games (SMB2 included), RPG elements from Super Mario RPG and Paper Mario, and 3D platforming from Super Mario 64 and SM Galaxy.

If that wouldn't have any Mario fans frothing at the mouth, nothing would.
 

Eldritch Warlord

New member
Jun 6, 2008
2,901
0
0
Grimm91 said:
In recent years I have noted a grand drop in both ingenuity and entertainment of the franchise. The most recent entree to the series was noted as abysmal so is the beloved plumber dieing?
Surely you aren't referring to Super Mario Galaxy.
 

glowstick

New member
Dec 7, 2008
23
0
0
Second, make the ULTIMATE Mario game, combining elements from every TRUE (read: non-spinoff) game Mario was involved in.
With the exception of Yoshi (rather, a better executed flying ability overall), wouldn't Mario Galaxy fit this very closely?

Has linear point A-to-B galaxies like the 2-D games, some more open world areas ala Mario 64/Sunshine, varieties of powerups (including the introduction to Fire Flower and Invincibility Star), and many enemies and objects that references every other Mario game (Airships, Dry Bones, Cataquacks, whatever you spell those stupid ducks).

I don't know about other people who have played it, but it just SCREAMED fanservice every turn and gravity pull you go.
 

Railu

New member
Aug 7, 2008
173
0
0
RAWKSTAR said:
I swear Im the only one who still enjoys Mario games... Galaxy was kickass.
Mario will always have fans. Even if the franchise goes on for 20 more years and every release is a giant ball of crap, there will be a devout following. I truly believe Mario is the one franchise that will never die. Just hope Miyamoto doesn't realize this and go the EA route and push them out year after year for the sake of making money. We'll see how many more releases he can go before just re-treading old ground.

I haven't care about the franchise since Mario64, the last truly great title (IMO). Not that the rest are bad games, I just don't care any more.
 

mark_n_b

New member
Mar 24, 2008
729
0
0
Grimm91 said:
None taken, but it shows how some fan feel and the fans make a franchise not the critics. I have played Galaxy and I just didn't like it.
I have no Love for Galaxy either, but that opinion is unusual (using the game's critical and consumer appeal as indicated by set scores and unit sales to objectively measure). Just because you didn't find any great appeal in galaxy does not mean that Mario games over the years have been losing steam. Compare Mario titles to the Sonic franchise.

Also given that the Mario Line is a key mascot for Nintendo and that you find Mario in hugely successful puzzle, party, and sport titles (Mario Golf, Mario Strikers, Mario Party, etc.) So, no, Mario is not done for, and constantly accusing enjoyment of the franchise on warped "fan" perspective doesn't make you sound like you are making that intelligent an assessment of it all.

I will agree with many other posters who have made this observation, there are a lot of these "when is X going to end?" threads, I'm betting it is corresponding to ZP observations on Sonic.

eyes == roll.