I don't think that PE is an important subject at all but I did enjoy having it because it was always a nice break inbetween proper lessons. Nothing like a good run to clear your head.
Learn to throw and catch off the base of an 80 minute lesson? I doubt it. The kids who can catch are the ones who play sport, are naturally co-ordinated, or were taught to by their fathers. The kids who can't fumble the ball for a few minutes, then go to lunch and forget it all.Reolus said:1. Learn to throw and catch
If by being taught how to run you mean a teacher half demonstrating what to do then being made to run around for an hour, then yes, I guess they are. Nevertheless, the ones who do well are the ones who can run anyway. You can either run or you can't.Reolus said:2. Learn how to run (believe it or not, there is skill required!)
Hah, no way. If you can't swim by the time PE lessons start in high school you are guaranteed to be laughed at and made to feel like shit by the other kids. Absolutely guaranteed, no matter how popular you are. Even if that doesn't happen, you can't learn to swim by going to a PE class once a week for a few weeks before the teachers moving on in a few weeks to the next area of the syllabus.Reolus said:3. Learn how to swim
I agree with these two.Reolus said:4. Understand how to make healthy eating choices
5. Do Sex Ed.
I don't know what experiences you have had, but for me (who has attended 3 schools in three different countries) PE lessons are exactly about being the fastest or the best. All the PE teachers I have encountered are all chummy with the talented athletes (usually because they coach the school teams they are a part of) and the unfit kids just get ignored, or forced to do something that they don't want to do. I do agree with you that the curriculum may not force this to happen, but it does.Reolus said:It's not neccessarily about being the fastest or the best - those kind of social pressures come from being part of a group and being asked to perform, not the curriculum or the teacher themselves, though I am sure there are some exceptions to that rule and some people have bad experiences about what they had to do.
Yes, you're right. Every year more people become fat and more people become unhealthy. This isn't because of PE lessons, this isn't even because of school - this is because of a change in society, and parenting techniques. These things are 100 times bigger than PE lessons, these things actually have serious impacts.Reolus said:Whether you like it or not, there are more obese people and people are less coordinated, because of whatever reasons (technology, society, etc) important physical skills are an aspect of being a capable and successful human being. In fact, some people are paid very well to be successful at hitting a ball or perform some other physical activity.
How about the fact that PE lessons only serve the people who are fit and strong to begin with, and if you aren't fit or strong then you have a good chance to be openly ridiculed or mocked?Reolus said:I don't think "because I'm not good at it so it made me feel bad" is just cause for removing the physical element of education.
Well to answer your question about why people think it's cool or uncool. The reason why book smarts isn't celebrated as much is because it's something that not many people at that time can sympathize with or appreciate. It may be nice that you know how to set up a Hadron Collider as a high school student, but no one will fuckin care! Maybe 20 years from now, but what are you going to do now? Build one in shop class? Also, amazing literature is something than not something that everyone can empathize with immediately. It may sound great when you read it aloud and may sound very stirring and inspiring, but when you compare the lone receiver catching the game winning ball in his hands, there's no comparison with the reaction. Actions speak louder than words to suffice. Now I'm not saying that it's bad. In high school, the kids that are picked on are the kids that haven't learned to adapt to the present, and are either living in the past, or are so preoccupied with the future, they neglect the present and their bodies. And for American society supporting Sports stars, well I can't really say much. The most celebrated people are often entertainers. If I shout Peyton Manning or Hannah Montana are signing autographs, thousands of people will gather. However, if I shout Norman Borlaug is coming to sign autographs people will say "Huh?" A Nobel Laureate that saved over several billion people's lives isn't necessarily as popular or famous. But fame doesn't necessarily equal success. That's what matters.Kortney said:First of all I realise you are a primary school teacher here, but I'll be talking about high school during this post. Primary school PE lessons are very, very different from High School lessons (at least they were for me) and the thread is about high school. So;
Learn to throw and catch off the base of an 80 minute lesson? I doubt it. The kids who can catch are the ones who play sport, are naturally co-ordinated, or were taught to by their fathers. The kids who can't fumble the ball for a few minutes, then go to lunch and forget it all.Reolus said:1. Learn to throw and catch
If by being taught how to run you mean a teacher half demonstrating what to do then being made to run around for an hour, then yes, I guess they are. Nevertheless, the ones who do well are the ones who can run anyway. You can either run or you can't.Reolus said:2. Learn how to run (believe it or not, there is skill required!)
Hah, no way. If you can't swim by the time PE lessons start in high school you are guaranteed to be laughed at and made to feel like shit by the other kids. Absolutely guaranteed, no matter how popular you are. Even if that doesn't happen, you can't learn to swim by going to a PE class once a week for a few weeks before the teachers moving on in a few weeks to the next area of the syllabus.Reolus said:3. Learn how to swim
I agree with these two.Reolus said:4. Understand how to make healthy eating choices
5. Do Sex Ed.
I don't know what experiences you have had, but for me (who has attended 3 schools in three different countries) PE lessons are exactly about being the fastest or the best. All the PE teachers I have encountered are all chummy with the talented athletes (usually because they coach the school teams they are a part of) and the unfit kids just get ignored, or forced to do something that they don't want to do. I do agree with you that the curriculum may not force this to happen, but it does.Reolus said:It's not neccessarily about being the fastest or the best - those kind of social pressures come from being part of a group and being asked to perform, not the curriculum or the teacher themselves, though I am sure there are some exceptions to that rule and some people have bad experiences about what they had to do.
Yes, you're right. Every year more people become fat and more people become unhealthy. This isn't because of PE lessons, this isn't even because of school - this is because of a change in society, and parenting techniques. These things are 100 times bigger than PE lessons, these things actually have serious impacts.Reolus said:Whether you like it or not, there are more obese people and people are less coordinated, because of whatever reasons (technology, society, etc) important physical skills are an aspect of being a capable and successful human being. In fact, some people are paid very well to be successful at hitting a ball or perform some other physical activity.
In regards to your point about people being paid money to hit a ball - then yes, you're absolutely right. But how many of those people ended up like that because of a PE program at school? I'd be willing to wager a lot of money that the answer is: none of them.
Going by that logic, there are just as much if not more people making serious money through music and acting. Why not make active participation in front of the whole class compulsory in those areas? After all, people are making money from it right?
How about the fact that PE lessons only serve the people who are fit and strong to begin with, and if you aren't fit or strong then you have a good chance to be openly ridiculed or mocked?Reolus said:I don't think "because I'm not good at it so it made me feel bad" is just cause for removing the physical element of education.
The thing I have a problem with is PE lessons being compulsory up until the very senior years of high school. I honestly don't see the point.
I'm sorry if I appear somewhat bitter in this post, but sporting culture annoys the shit out of me. It's "cool" to be able to swing a bat around or kick a football, but it's "uncool" to be about to work out complex physics or mathematical equations, or to be able to write beautiful literature. It's 2010, when the hell are we going to get past this?
And people wonder why the culture we live in is brain dead. Some stupid half wit with no personality and no qualities apart from the fact he is extremely strong gets more air time than the few bright people who are capable of changing the way we live. Kids are brought up to think that the best thing they can be is a sports star. That's ridiculous and my experience with PE lessons have further exemplified this.
Yes we need more harsh physical pushing in schools everyone gets it way to easy. BUT it should be optional if you don't do PE you should have to copy out the bible or dictionary from cover to cover.mrhappyface said:Is PE an important class?
Yea my Japanese teacher is a Russian whose third language is English . . . fun timesDys said:The way it was taught in my high school (or perhaps my attitude toward it), it was one of the most important classes. It was a necessary physical release for myself and many other students, but more importantly it promoted leadership and encouraged teamwork in a way that no other high school class so much as hinted at.
There were a lot of classes that were a waste, a half assed LOTE program isn't worth it's weight in dogshit (really, you're going to get the greek teacher to take italian this semester?). I don't even want to think about the history course that did a units study of world war one without mentioning Franz Ferdinand (or any of the lead up to the war).
Because how else are we going to motivate the children to work than through cruel harassment for being unfit and flattering praise for being the pinnacle of human biology? Cuz the play an hour a day commercials on TV don't seem to being having much effect...zehydra said:it's not a class. Yet somehow it always makes the list of mandatory ones...
You mean because they are too stupid to appreciate it right? Yeah, that's kinda my point. Maybe if kids had a larger desire to be able to understand not only literature, but social science, history, economics, science, physics and mathematics instead of trying to run faster than each other the world might be a bit of a better fucking place. Ignorance like that breads a huge part of the hatefulness and violence that exists today.mrhappyface said:Well to answer your question about why people think it's cool or uncool. The reason why book smarts isn't celebrated as much is because it's something that not many people at that time can sympathize with or appreciate.Also, amazing literature is something than not something that everyone can empathize with immediately
Oh, Mr Happy Face! That may be the one of, if not the most ignorant thing I've seen on here. Congratulations.mrhappyface said:It may be nice that you know how to set up a Hadron Collider as a high school student, but no one will fuckin care! Maybe 20 years from now, but what are you going to do now? Build one in shop class?
Move aside Shakespeare! Move aside Lennon! This lone receiver and his amazing ability to close his mitt at the right moment has "no comparison" with the reaction you inspire!mrhappyface said:It may sound great when you read it aloud and may sound very stirring and inspiring, but when you compare the lone receiver catching the game winning ball in his hands, there's no comparison with the reaction.
Heh, that's weird. In my experience I would say the kids who are picked on are the ones who are different, and the ones who pick on them are the disappointing human beings who are not accepting or understanding enough. But maybe I just had a weird experience, and maybe you are totally right.mrhappyface said:In high school, the kids that are picked on are the kids that haven't learned to adapt to the present, and are either living in the past, or are so preoccupied with the future, they neglect the present and their bodies.
OK, I sort of sugar coated it right there. I'm saying that if you're into stuff outside the norm of the school masses, that's cool and all, BUT if that's all that you're preoccupied with then you'll become an instant target for bullies. It may seem nice that you can potentially find the cure for cancer for the future, but that still doesn't help the fact that the douchebag just turtled your bag and dumped it into the toilet. This may seem a little bit of a bizarre analogy, but I think it'll work: During Roman times, Christians were hated and despised for being different. The ones that were openly Christian were roughed up and thrown into the Colosseum. All the other ones were Christians in secret or affiliated to patricians. Now coming back to the present, I'm saying that it's okay to be different, but just be different at home. Or do something that identifies yourself with a powerful clique so you have more freedom and people are less likely to pick on you. Hey, I had glasses and was smart, but being affiliated with the varsity football team and being a track star had significant perks. Not trying to be mean, just trying to be realistic.Kortney said:You mean because they are too stupid to appreciate it right? Yeah, that's kinda my point. Maybe if kids had a larger desire to be able to understand not only literature, but social science, history, economics, science, physics and mathematics instead of trying to run faster than each other the world might be a bit of a better fucking place. Ignorance like that breads a huge part of the hatefulness and violence that exists today.mrhappyface said:Well to answer your question about why people think it's cool or uncool. The reason why book smarts isn't celebrated as much is because it's something that not many people at that time can sympathize with or appreciate.Also, amazing literature is something than not something that everyone can empathize with immediately
Oh, Mr Happy Face! That may be the one of, if not the most ignorant thing I've seen on here. Congratulations.mrhappyface said:It may be nice that you know how to set up a Hadron Collider as a high school student, but no one will fuckin care! Maybe 20 years from now, but what are you going to do now? Build one in shop class?
Yeah! Curse those kids who can build the most complex and amazing physics-defying devices ever known in history! Who "fuckin" cares about them and their extreme intellect. Why don't they just go outside and throw a baseball like the normal kids!
With that disgusting attitude, the radio would not have been invented. The telephone would not have been invented. The television would not have been invented. Nor would the airplane, the car, the boat, the internet, nor would modern medicine for fucks sake.
You see my point now? You are acting awfully ignorant and unaware of the mind boggling genius that allows you and I to communicate right now. If only the people who allowed that realised that no one gave a shit about them and their little play inventions. Right?
Move aside Shakespeare! Move aside Lennon! This lone receiver and his amazing ability to close his mitt at the right moment has "no comparison" with the reaction you inspire!mrhappyface said:It may sound great when you read it aloud and may sound very stirring and inspiring, but when you compare the lone receiver catching the game winning ball in his hands, there's no comparison with the reaction.
Are you reading what you are writing man?
Heh, that's weird. In my experience I would say the kids who are picked on are the ones who are different, and the ones who pick on them are the disappointing human beings who are not accepting or understanding enough. But maybe I just had a weird experience, and maybe you are totally right.mrhappyface said:In high school, the kids that are picked on are the kids that haven't learned to adapt to the present, and are either living in the past, or are so preoccupied with the future, they neglect the present and their bodies.
So according to you, the people who are picked on are the people who "neglect the present". Can I ask, what the fuck does that mean? Oh wait, I just remembered that you don't know.
So it's not the socially awkward kids? It's not the unnatractive kids? It's not the weak kids? It's not the eccentric kids? It's not the different kids? It's simply the ones who "neglect the present!". HA!
From now on I will call bullies "the defenders of the present!" instead of "jerks". Thanks for the lesson man.
And you are right. Once, my teacher was telling me about this nerd called Albert Einstein. Man, he was such a present neglecter. Ha, what a **** he was.