Zomg me too. PRO COMBO.Raioken18 said:I'm more of a Logitech fanboy.
I have the Logitech G9x mouse and a Microsoft Sidewinder x6 Keyboard.
Clearly, this is fate. We should exchange all personal information.
( Please don't actually do ).
Zomg me too. PRO COMBO.Raioken18 said:I'm more of a Logitech fanboy.
I have the Logitech G9x mouse and a Microsoft Sidewinder x6 Keyboard.
[Cough]bullshit[/Cough]Baneat said:Higher dpi means absolutely nothing
Realistically not many people play with 5600 DPI, my mouse can go up to that and I don't use it, coz it's just way to fast. After a certain point (around 3500 DPI), it really doesn't help much to the average player. It's like how the latest Nike studs technology might give Lionel Messi the slight edge over his defender, but is near useless to the average joe playing football with his mates.Snowalker said:One thing I'm finding kinda odd is how those who support Razer also say higher DPI isn't needed...
I mean, I can see the logic in not needing a higher DPI, but I think I'd rather have to high and having wasted dpi than not being able to go up when I need it.
Another thing I find confusing is, "razer is really good, but extremely unreliable."
What?
if its unreliable, then how can it be good? can someone clarify?
Captcha: rhell power...
Yeah, I understand that for the most part, like I said, I'm kinda guy that would like to have the option to go that high, rather than be limited by the hardware. But I can understand that if you want to save money, and you know exactly at what speed you play (I don't know for sure, you see), then by all means, save money.S_SienZ said:Realistically not many people play with 5600 DPI, my mouse can go up to that and I don't use it, coz it's just way to fast. After a certain point (around 3500 DPI), it really doesn't help much to the average player. It's like how the latest Nike studs technology might give Lionel Messi the slight edge over his defender, but is near useless to the average joe playing football with his mates.
Its good while it lasts.Snowalker said:Another thing I find confusing is, "razer is really good, but extremely unreliable."
What?
if its unreliable, then how can it be good? can someone clarify?
Illyasviel said:Its good while it lasts.Snowalker said:Another thing I find confusing is, "razer is really good, but extremely unreliable."
What?
if its unreliable, then how can it be good? can someone clarify?
That's why I said buy a Logitech G9x.Snowalker said:Eh, yeah, but... Wouldn't it seem that a mediocre mouse that lasts forever is better than a good mouse that lasts a year?
I mean, at 60$ a pop, I would like some durability, screw comfort, I'm interested in two things, performance and reliability, because you can adjust your preference if you stick with something long enough.
I know, I know, like I said, I'm going to stick with my original choice for the time being, if it ever does crap out, (chance are it won't but, you never know) that'll be the mouse I get.Illyasviel said:That's why I said buy a Logitech G9x.Snowalker said:Eh, yeah, but... Wouldn't it seem that a mediocre mouse that lasts forever is better than a good mouse that lasts a year?
I mean, at 60$ a pop, I would like some durability, screw comfort, I'm interested in two things, performance and reliability, because you can adjust your preference if you stick with something long enough.![]()
Snowalker said:Not to say I don't care, but I'm kinda set on the mouse I linked. Looking at the G9x, I see what you're saying, but I just think I'll like the other better. I kinda wished you had actually argued your point rather than just saying, "Get this, look for a sale." I mean, it conveyed a point, but I had to look it up on my own to understand why you think this is a good mouse. I'm not saying this isn't a good mouse either, it looks damn good, and very similar to the one I linked, I think I just prefer the one I linked. Thanks, I will look at this one.Illyasviel said:Get a Logitech G9x. Keep your eyes peeled for a sale or open box item and you can snag them for USD30 or less.
EDIT: never mind, did you edit this while I was replying? oh well. like I said, I think I prefer the other. I've seen nothing to make me doubt the reliably of the other, and I'm reading reviews daily for something bad, and so far all I've seen is that the one I picked has a weird choice for the cord, otherwise, they say its extremely good.
Good gameplan.Snowalker said:I know, I know, like I said, I'm going to stick with my original choice for the time being, if it ever does crap out, (chance are it won't but, you never know) that'll be the mouse I get.
We're talkin ranges of 7200/5600/3500 here, not 400/800 like your shittiest optical mouse. My statement's broad but it covers the area of mouses we're interested in specifically (but not explicitly stated!).CCountZero said:[Cough]bullshit[/Cough]Baneat said:Higher dpi means absolutely nothing
Higher DPI is EXTREMELY useful for accuracy when playing with high sensitivity, which again leads to decresed aim-time, with no sacrifice of accuracy.
Which again leads to a reduced chance of mouse-related injuries.
Beat that.