Is Saw 7 too far?

[azurawolf]

I can't wait for the new movies or the game. I have loved the Saw movies every since the first one came out and I will continue to love them. Now... I do hope that they don't make a million of them but so far, I am very happy with them all. I love the story behind the movies and I love the twists and turns in the movies.

 

[frank220]

7 horror movies? Is it the 80's again? I'll go get my synthesizer!

 

[Nemorov]

The first one was good.

But seriously they are just stretching the story beyond ridiculousness now. The fact they release a movie every year is just odd to me. Whatever though, if people watch it I don't really care.

Yes, I rather liked the first one, but movie franchises like that need to be shorter, else they fall head-first into ridiculous.

 

[Deathsquirt]

Like everyone else has said Saw needs to just die. The first and possibly second were good but they've gotten the point through by now.

 

[XJ-0461]

I've never seen the point of torture films. It just seems like random violence for two hours with no or very little story to it.

Yes, I am generalising, but if someone could suggest one that does something a little different I'd be willing to change my views on this matter.

 

[L4hlborg]

No, the Land Before Time 11 is too far.

I used to like them as a kid. Until the 5th one or so. Haven't watched Saw, but I would imagine their low on ideas. Every movie series, that hasn't originally planned to be a trilogy or something cannot take more than 2 sequels. Seriously.

 

[lordgazoontite]

no they are just following the horror trend of the 80's where the series starts of good and starts getting redundant.

 

[historybuff]

I never watched any of the Saw movies because they sounded absolutely ridiculous. Like torture porn. And I like movies with action and a plot.

 

[USSR]

My brother and friend are both obsessed with Saw. So they'll be very happy, me on the other hand cannot stand it any longer. Saw is dead, no more horrible sequels!

What do you hate about the Saw sequels?
I just want to know if you have a valid reason or are one of those "Hate it because everyone else hates it", idiots.

 

[saxist01]

No, the Land Before Time 11 is too far.

Agreed, but did you see the thread on the pokemon one? like movie number 20+ or something?

and for Saw 7 or w/e. the movie is giving physicos idea's to kill people. that's not a legit reason but i mean. the movie is based off KILLING people in disturbing ways... who the f*** say's
"i enjoy watching people die in horrific disgusting ways"

if you or anyone you know has said that. Get away! and if it's yourself then jump off something really high.....

I'll give Pokemon the higher number, but I'll bet the first one wasn't a classic like the original Land Before Time.

And as far as enjoying watching people die in horrific ways, the Final Destination series is all about that. Just like a car wreck, you don't like it but you can't look away.

 

[saxist01]

No, the Land Before Time 11 is too far.

I used to like them as a kid. Until the 5th one or so. Haven't watched Saw, but I would imagine their low on ideas. Every movie series, that hasn't originally planned to be a trilogy or something cannot take more than 2 sequels. Seriously.

I own the first one, but stopped watching after number 2. I did not want to sully my memories of a truly great movie. Also, it was sad that they had to change the voices, especially for Ducky.