I think the terms "racist" and "sexist" have been under heavy inflation recently. It seems every time a piece of fiction is released with someone in it who just might have a minor link to a stereotype, a lot of people are instantly up in arms about it. Well, in my humble opinion, too bad for them.
Point one: it's fiction. As in, NOT REAL. I find the reality that fiction creators have to listen, or worse, bend to the political correctness-crowd much more disturbing than their supposed offense.
Point two: so there is a non-whiteskinned fellow with a nosering. Or, oh gasp, a female with large breasts. How the bleep do you even make the mental leap from that to racism or sexism? Where does this even have the possibility of leading to discrimination, slavery or whatever else that gets thrown around so casually? How does the depiction, or even description, of a forebum automagically lead to (I assume, males) disrespecting all women?
Let's look at the leaps you have to make. First off, that the character has any relation to the view of the creator about something in real life. Pretty big leap already. Next, that said message is what the correctness-crowd thinks it is. From there, that whatever it is is the view that "this" is specifically meant to denigrate. Then, from there, that "this" is about all women/ethnic-group-members/whoever is being "attacked". Then we have to leap to the creator trying to not just spread, but force this opinion of this on others. If just spread, then it is (assuming all earlier assumptions) still an (unpleasant to some) instance of freedom of speech, after all. Good enough to protest, but not necessarily racism or sexism yet. Then, another leap, to them using this to spread said "message", then on to them having some motive to actively pursue a reality where their "message" comes closer to being the reality. You still with me? Good, explain it to me please, because you lost me a couple of leaps back.
Point three: in this specific case, there is indeed a dark-skinned fellow displayed in an unfavorable light. Guess what, the mastermind of that evil (and therefore, obviously, a much worse person), our dear friend Bison, is white. Do we see white males up in arms about that? Or when WASPy Americans/Germans/Russians get shot up in some shooter? Isn't the fact that that produces very little outcry on its own testament enough to the ridiculousness of this whole "issue"?
No, I don't think every woman in a game should be a "bimbo". Or heroes only male. Why? Because that is boring! Not because of some incomprehensibly silly and completely fallacious racism- or sexism-argument. Games are fiction, they should remain fiction, and therefore remain free of misguided content-control. IMO, people who believe they are personally being attacked by a piece of fiction need toe-surgery, theirs are wayyy too long. Do not view everything as an attack. It's not good for your bloodpressure, and aggravates others needlessly. Not to mention causing massive rambling threads on forums.