Yoshi178 said:
Avnger said:
Yoshi178 said:
Avnger said:
when you're forced to pay extra for a controller such as the Pro, that would slant numbers away from traditional controller use.
Excuse's.
If we're calling basic economics and corporate practices 101 excuses, sure. This edited response of yours, compared to the original, is at least open about how you're refusing to analyze the facts of the matter objectively. Being a fanboy is all well and good until you stop being able to even pretend to critically analyze a corporate entity's profit-motivated business dealings[footnote]Yes, I am explicitly drawing this out to show that Nintendo is no more your "friend" than EA or Ubisoft or [/footnote] in an impartial manner.
or you're just too afraid of change to try something different. scared you might like it if you actually give motion controls a proper chance?
No, I don't like to put jelly on my peanut butter sandwiches. They get slimy that way. Non-sequitur is non-sequitur.
We were discussing Nintendo's business practices affecting the manner in which players interact with their products; your assumptions about my personal gaming habits are not related.[footnote]And yes, I have used motion controls. I bought a Wii (along with the rest of the entire world), played a number of games on it, and came to the conclusion that having to waggle a wii-mote in a specific manner is much less convenient and immersive than simply pressing a button that does the same thing.[/footnote]
If you don't have any evidence to dispute the facts I've brought up (other than the article that I acknowledged, with caveats, above), you're better off not posting than trying to create an ad-hominem argument; I'm simply going to keep calling you out for the latter.