"Booze ain't food." - Nathan ExplosionPaulH said:Very limited booze selection. Booze is a food group, right?
Booze might not be food, but dammit if it doesn't do in a pinch.
"Booze ain't food." - Nathan ExplosionPaulH said:Very limited booze selection. Booze is a food group, right?
Stout certainly does in a pinch. Some of them are so dense, they're like drinking bread.Ironman126 said:Booze might not be food, but dammit if it doesn't do in a pinch.
I read somewhere once the original idea behind beer was as a portable source of food that kept preserved by the alcohol, and that they had much lower alcohol content. Then we realised how fun it was to smash 20 of them down and made higher alcohol content ones.Silvanus said:Stout certainly does in a pinch. Some of them are so dense, they're like drinking bread.Ironman126 said:Booze might not be food, but dammit if it doesn't do in a pinch.
I had one called Old Rasputin Russian Imperial Stout. You can just about stand a spoon up in that brew. There's another one (by Oskar Blues), Ten Fidy, that's the consistency and color of motor oil, pours like it and everything.Silvanus said:Stout certainly does in a pinch. Some of them are so dense, they're like drinking bread.Ironman126 said:Booze might not be food, but dammit if it doesn't do in a pinch.
There's also that drinking beer was FAR safer than drinking water, almost every human society invented things to drink that were ways of making water safer, teas involve boiling water which kills bacteria while beers have alcohol that makes them safer for example. Hell, for a long time in Europe you had "small beer", really, really weak beer that nevertheless was safer than water to drink so kids could have it or it could be easily carried in a waterskin.Richard Gozin-Yu said:Basically there is an ongoing debate based on uncertain archaeological evidence, as to which came first: The Bread or The Beer. Part of the problem is that evidence has been found of germinating cereal grains at a time when it wasn't thought that we made beer, but we did make bread. Some people take that as evidence of brewing, while others assume it was spontaneous fermentation that wasn't a desirable outcome. It's a big deal, because as it stands there are two big narratives out there in academia:Fieldy409 said:I read somewhere once the original idea behind Bread was as a portable source of food that kept preserved by the alcohol, and that they had much lower alcohol content. Then we realised how fun it was to smash 20 of them down and made higher alcohol content ones.Silvanus said:Stout certainly does in a pinch. Some of them are so dense, they're like drinking bread.Ironman126 said:Booze might not be food, but dammit if it doesn't do in a pinch.
Might be bullshit though.
Narrative A: Humans were hunter gatherers, but at some time in the past we engaged in some primitive agriculture. Mostly this involved gathering wild barley when it was in season, then storing it for lean times. When you store grain either for later eating, or planting, sometimes it gets wet and germinates. If it's hot and sunny later, it might dry out, and that process can give you a malted grain. It would have been a pretty nice snack, or it might have rained again, harder this time. Now the malted barley is swimming in water, and with wild yeast or bacteria it starts to ferment. Our ancestor comes back to retrieve his grain, and finds this bubbling sludge with a funky smell. He's hungry, so he tastes it, and it's good![footnote]It's also incredibly nutritious. People in ancient Egypt were given their rations in beer for example.[/footnote] People get much more interested in barley, even though it's somewhat difficult to gather. This drives people to gather in larger groups and engage in agriculture at the level of planting and harvesting crops. The surplus of grains need to be reliably turned into compact, portable nutrition (as you said) and so bread is invented.
Narrative B: Humans were hunter gatherers, but at some time they started to gather in larger and larger groups. They would have been harvesting wild cereal grains, and at some point they made the connection that it was possible to plant and harvest them. This allowed the formation of even larger groups, which drove social and technological development. The need for a compact and portable source of nutrition, and a way to handle the problem of surplus grains leads to the invention of bread. The process described in Narrative A, whereby stored grain spontaneously germinates and ferments happens in this context, now that it's likely to find clay containers full of grain anywhere you find humans. Beer is born.
It's hard to find evidence that conclusively supports one narrative over another at this point, and not necessarily likely that it will be found any time soon.
You could go for meat that's produced responsibly. It'd probably require some research to figure out what your options are and you'll probably get less meat for the same amount of money, but you'll still be able to enjoy meat.Rosiv said:I think the longest I lasted on a vegetarian diet was 3 days, and then I wimped out.
I just missed eating meat so much, so I guess that would be the con. Although watching that recent episode on VICE about the environmental hazards of irresponsible meat production made me consider the no meat lifestyle.
That is bad... But like I sad, doing some research before buying is the smart thing to do. Other than that, instead of eating the same amount of meat, you could eat less meat. As long as your diet is balanced, you generally don't need to have meat with every meal or even every day to get the nutrition you need.sheppie said:The problem with that is that few people can afford to double what they spend on food, and you get into some pretty shady parts of the food industry where there are some pretty unprofessional farmers working. Last time I looked at that, I found the farm sells raw milk.NPC009 said:You could go for meat that's produced responsibly. It'd probably require some research to figure out what your options are and you'll probably get less meat for the same amount of money, but you'll still be able to enjoy meat.