I think you're exaggerating. Egypt is also subject to a low-level insurgency, it is still relatively safe. This kind of things occurs in many places around the world.Yeah, I'll tell that to the guy I know who came under mortar fire in Afghanistan just last year. When was the last time terrorists in Europe used indirect fire in their attacks? When was the last time one country in Europe had over 1,000 terror attacks in a year? Afghanistan is safer but to call it safe is to be very out of touch. There's still open warfare in several parts and even if it is winding down, it is in a precarious and unstable situation were it could escalate again.
Besides, my irony was pointed at a Swedish authority which has been seeing Afghanistan as totally safe to be in since before Sweden pulled its peacekeeping force out (and replaced it with a rather large contingent of trainers and mentors) in 2014. It is hard to take their assessment seriously when they've decided Afghanistan was safe while Swedish peace keepers were guiding German fighter jets in to take out fortified strongpoints that contained heavy weapons like mortars and RPGs and the US ISAF contingent was busy in offensive combat operations to quench the resurgence of Taliban controlled territory in southern Afghanistan.
What was the real reason for Sweden to have this decision in your opinion?