IT Security Mag Tricked Into Publishing Hilarious Nonsense

Recommended Videos

The Wooster

King Snap
Jul 15, 2008
15,305
0
0
IT Security Mag Tricked Into Publishing Hilarious Nonsense


"Our Experiments soon proved that micokernelizing our PDP 11s was more effective than exokernelizing them."

Here are a few excerpts from an article called Nmap: The Internet Considered Harmful - DARPA Interference Checking Kludge Scanning. [http://nmap.org/misc/hakin9-nmap-ebook-ch1.pdf] The article ran in the latest eBook edition of Hakin9's guide to Nmap, the popular security scanner.

"Unlike other authors, we have decided not to enable time since 1967 [20]. Along these same lines, we are grateful for randomized kernels; without them, we could not optimize for usability simultaneously with simplicity."
"Had we prototyped our heterogeneous cluster, as opposed to simulating it in courseware, we would have seen degraded results. First, cyberneticists added 10GB/s of Internet access to our network. Further, we removed a 7TB USB key from our highly available cluster to consider our Xbox network."
Are those perhaps a bit too subtle? How about this code that appears on the second page of the article.

/ Anti ROP kernel heap non exec stack payload bypass

/ 8=============================================> ( (

/ Success!
The article is, of course, absolute gibberish. There's no such thing as DARPA Inference Checking Kludge Scanning, or DICKS as it's often called. The article was submitted to satirize the magazine's less-than-competent fact checking as well as its habit of spamming security researches with requests for them to submit articles for free. Hakin9 ran the piece in its entirety, ASCII dongs and all.

"Maybe they were sick of Hakin9's constant please-write-an-unpaid-article-for-us spam and decided to submit some well-crafted gibberish in response," security researcher Gordon Lyon (Fyodor) wrote in a post to the popular seclists mailing list last week. "They clearly chose that title so just so they could refer to it as DICKS throughout the paper. There is even an ASCII penis in the 'sample output' section, but apparently none of this raised any flags from Hakin9's 'review board'."

Hakin9 has since apologized to its readers [http://hakin9.org/statement/] for the "accident."

"We can only wish that this, hopefully, single error will not undermine the general perception of Hakin9 as a professional magazine; offering the highest standard possible. We would also like to kindly ask you not to pass any judgement on the authors collaborating with us, who devote their time and put their hearts into the quality of every issue."

The fake article bears a resemblance to physics professor, Alan Sokal's, hilarious Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity, in which he argued that quantum gravity was a social and linguistic construct, mainly to see if a magazine called Social Text would run an article made entirely out of nonsense. It did.

Source: The Register [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10/05/hakin9_silliness/]


Permalink
 

antipunt

New member
Jan 3, 2009
3,035
0
0
Prank responses for legitimate annoying spams.

So gooodd

At the pharmacy I work for, my boss is way too super nice to these spamming companies that keep badgering us when we're clearly not interesting. He nicely suffers the same speeches over and over while they consistently refuse to hang up.

So one day I positive ID the most annoying one and proceed to pretend to be a Pizzaria with Indian workers. Fooled the guy into thinking I was Indian and working at a restaurant I made up (Peppino's pizza)

only to awkwardly find out the next day the store actually existed >_>
 

Quaxar

New member
Sep 21, 2009
3,949
0
0
I have never heard of this magazine but they are clearly morons.

It also reminds me of the time when my mother and a teacher colleague of hers submitted a project to no less than the state bord of education that consisted of about 20 pages of very well-formulated glibberish... and got a special mention for "best project submission" or something similar.
That was a very funny day for us all indeed.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
It's... It's beautiful...

http://img0067.popscreencdn.com/7198730_cuteness-overload-face-meme-on-all-the-rage-faces.jpg

There's so many treasures in here. I mean, look at this!

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. First, we motivate the need for A* search.
Second, we place our work in context with the previous work in this area. As a result, we conclude.

"As a result, we conclude".

Just... Wow.

One must understand our network configuration to grasp the genesis of our results. We performed a real-time deployment on our planetary-scale cluster to prove John McCarthy?s construction of the Internet in 1986.

And then it shows a graph e-commerce and "independently unstable modalities" measured with "work factor" in cylinders (???) and energy (!!!???) in GHz (!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!).
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
I know absolutely nothing about computer coding and such...but I still found this article to be pretty damn funny.

The /penis followed by /Success! really got a good laugh out of me. To think that a "respectable" magazine would print something so obvious is just damn funny.
 

Vie

New member
Nov 18, 2009
932
0
0
Now that's a Dick move.

A Fabulous Dick move, of which its creators should be duly proud.
 

Headdrivehardscrew

New member
Aug 22, 2011
1,660
0
0
Two things:

1) The article is quite clearly absolute gibberish, even if one were to skip trying to make sense of the offensive acronyms or the offensive ASCII artwork. Any publication that wants to be taken seriously should catch this in their shit filter shields, which should always be up and running. From the get-go, it sounds like something Jared Loughner did when he was in his pre-amok loopy phase.

2) So, what I just learned is this: HAKIN9 'magazine', for which they demand a somewhat high $180 to an insane $5000 a year, are asking/tapping/spamming professionals and people in the know to submit free articles? That's quite unacceptable, methinks.
 

Hero in a half shell

It's not easy being green
Dec 30, 2009
4,286
0
0
Absolutely fantastic.

I love how it's also the very first thing in the magazine. Pride of house page one.

Even though we believe most readers of Hacking9 shall be
familiar with classic Nmap use as a port scanner, using Nmap as a weaponized tool for remote backdooring is essentially
not public.
Ok, the thing is called "DICKS" and it operates by "remote backdooring". Is this whole article an allegory for anal sex? Because that's beyond awesome.
 

masticina

New member
Jan 19, 2011
763
0
0
Oh my oh my

Laughing so hard. This is worth printing out and reading on the train.
 

IamLEAM1983

Neloth's got swag.
Aug 22, 2011
2,581
0
0
Quaxar said:
I have never heard of this magazine but they are clearly morons.

It also reminds me of the time when my mother and a teacher colleague of hers submitted a project to no less than the state bord of education that consisted of about 20 pages of very well-formulated glibberish... and got a special mention for "best project submission" or something similar.
That was a very funny day for us all indeed.
Higher Education tends to hammer in one important fact into anyone who pursues it with any degree of cynicism, as is my case.

You can pass anything off as being scholarly and well-researched. Literally anything. Use complex words, sacrifice normal, average concise speech for deliberate verbiage, drop some quotes here and there and above all; build an obtuse bibliography. The more obscure the cited passages are, the more likely the review board is to go "Uuuuhhh... Okay! Pass!".

The problem comes from the fact that someone who's got two doctorates, a study group and a research department to take care of along with one or two masters degree-level applicants to coach isn't likely to have a lot of time to spend updating their knowledge of their covered field. The only way they can stay more or less up-to-date is with yearly conferences that can last agonizingly long weeks. A lot of 'em tend to go "Yeah, screw that. Too busy."

The more they keep doing that, the deeper the divide gets. Every promotion has its smartass snarker who figures he'll pass bullshit off to the review committee. I've corrected thesis projects over the past six months that left me with one huge question:

"What the fuck is this shit?!"

That's not surprising, seeing as I can't keep up with my promotion's rather wide range of research topics. I'm the resident Lovecraft nerd; I know jack shit about Per Walleu or Steig Larsson, much less about French Noir authors from the fifties and sixties.
 

BreakfastMan

Scandinavian Jawbreaker
Jul 22, 2010
4,367
0
0
Well, they really borked up here. I mean, anyone who has a decent knowledge of computers should have been able to tell that was just plain nonsense from 5 minutes with the thing. I doubt they will ever be respected by anyone as a legit, professional magazine after this. I know I won't. XD
 

Korolev

No Time Like the Present
Jul 4, 2008
1,853
0
0
EDIT: Damn, someone already mentioned it.

Really reminds me of the Sokal Affair:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair

Basically, a theoretical physicist saw how much gibberish the social science journals were publishing, so he wrote up a fake, absolutely meaningless article filled with scientific-sounding baloney, and sent it in to see whether or not he could fool the editors. 99% of it was incomprehensible (and was written to be incomprehensible and meaningless).

It was lauded and published with much enthusiasm by one of the most prominent social sciences journals. You can read the "article" yourself, here:

http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html

To people who know nothing about physics, it looks vaguely plausible. To anyone who knows anything about physics, it's complete nonsense.
 

Dfskelleton

New member
Apr 6, 2010
2,851
0
0
I love this.
Good God, I love this so much.

It's about time someone got back at those ridiculous nonsense magazines.