It's time to settle this debate once and for all.

[Something Amyss]

That's what they WANT you to think! They've poisoned your mind! They sent the ants in with tiny nano machines to implant the roots and seeds of what will become your ultimate tree demise. You are just a pawn in their game.

You best give your self a labotomy now, if you know what's best for you.

So you're not only insulting me, you're insisting I cut my labs off?

 

[NoX 9]

Apparently this is actually the right answer. It's from a paper called 'The Ability of Woodchucks to Chuck Cellulose Fibers [http://scientopia.org/blogs/scicurious/2012/10/05/friday-weird-science-how-much-wood-could-a-woodchuck-chuck/]'.

Science!

A fairly dodgy paper that I would personally be a bit careful putting too much trust in, but yeah. Close enough I suppose! I think a longterm study on a larger sample is required to determine this important question once and for all.

 

[Ramzal]

I was hoping we'd settle this debate with a rap battle to the (pride) death. Sigh... I wish more debates would be solved this way.

 

[Something Amyss]

Well the other option is to cut off another part of the anatomy, and if you would rather do that... but that might be much worse. I have heard that part of you hurts much worse.

That might not be as big a problem as you think, but...STOP TRYING TO CHANGE ME!

 

[Something Amyss]

I was hoping we'd settle this debate with a rap battle to the (pride) death. Sigh... I wish more debates would be solved this way.

What would it be? Woodchuck vs "Dramatic Gopher?"

 

[Zombie_Fish]

Apparently this is actually the right answer. It's from a paper called 'The Ability of Woodchucks to Chuck Cellulose Fibers [http://scientopia.org/blogs/scicurious/2012/10/05/friday-weird-science-how-much-wood-could-a-woodchuck-chuck/]'.

Science!

A fairly dodgy paper that I would personally be a bit careful putting too much trust in, but yeah. Close enough I suppose! I think a longterm study on a larger sample is required to determine this important question once and for all.

Given that it was published in a journal called 'The Annals of Improbable Research', I think we can safely trust in their margins of error being absolutely massive. =P

 

[NoX 9]

Apparently this is actually the right answer. It's from a paper called 'The Ability of Woodchucks to Chuck Cellulose Fibers [http://scientopia.org/blogs/scicurious/2012/10/05/friday-weird-science-how-much-wood-could-a-woodchuck-chuck/]'.

Science!

A fairly dodgy paper that I would personally be a bit careful putting too much trust in, but yeah. Close enough I suppose! I think a longterm study on a larger sample is required to determine this important question once and for all.

Given that it was published in a journal called 'The Annals of Improbable Research', I think we can safely trust in their margins of error being absolutely massive. =P

'Massive' seems to be the right word, yeah X3

 

[Something Amyss]

That might not be as big a problem as you think, but...STOP TRYING TO CHANGE ME!

I CAN'T! BECAUSE I'M A VAMPIRE IN THE MASQUERADE AND I HAVE TO CHANGE YOU![/quote]

But I'm Fae. If you bite me, you will sparkle. Do you really want to be a Twilight Vampire?

 

[dalek sec]

Is it an African or European woodchuck?

[small][sub]What the hell am I doing with my life?[/sub][/small]

Answering important questions of the universe, duh!

OT: I would like to think at least eight pieces of wood a day at eight feet per piece of wood that has been chucked.