James Cameron Rips Into Piranha 3D

Recommended Videos

S_K

New member
Nov 16, 2007
163
0
0
Why the hell is he even wasting his time laying into Piranha 3D anyway? As for the OMG IT'S COMING AT MY FACE thing what rock has he been under? 3d horror movies have been doing that trick since day 1, those movies barely even class as horror imo it's just super gory action films almost like mortal kombat =P for the most part. As for the 3D issue in general for the most part it's just a gimmick, nothing more nothing less.
 

vansau

Mortician of Love
May 25, 2010
6,107
0
0
ninja_decadeo said:
vansau said:
...Several of my friends were extras in the movie, which was filmed on Lake Havasu (near my college campus)...
And so you have to say nice things about the movie because your friends and a location near your campus were involved with the film.

Could we have someone with no personal attachment to this film comment on this :D
Dead to me. DEAD.
 

BlueInkAlchemist

Ridiculously Awesome
Jun 4, 2008
2,231
0
0
-Zen- said:
Cameron: "Damn it, you imbeciles! 3D is meant for art, not this special effects for the sake of special effects bullshit! Gawd!"
James Cameron, a hypocrite? Say it ain't so.
 

IronicBeet

New member
Jun 27, 2009
392
0
0
Gordon_4 said:
IronicBeet said:
Right, because Dances With Wolves with blue cat people was WAY better.
Actually 'Last Samurai' is a more accurate comparison. 'Dances with Wolves', less so.

Look, Avatar was no story telling hero, which in truth let me down a little because usually Cameron is better than that. That said, I'd rather watch Avatar again than watch say, Revenge of the Fallen again.

However, for all the internet complaining that Avatar was crap etc, remember this: Cameron set out to make his movie the way he wanted. He has lived the dream of seeing a vision to completion. It's a rare feat.

Doesn't mean he isn't a huge dick when the mood takes him though :p
Eh, it is an alright movie I suppose, it's probably just that all the unnecessary praise it's been receiving (Not that it didn't deserve any at all) has turned me sour to the subject.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
ninja_decadeo said:
vansau said:
...Several of my friends were extras in the movie, which was filmed on Lake Havasu (near my college campus)...
And so you have to say nice things about the movie because your friends and a location near your campus were involved with the film.

Could we have someone with no personal attachment to this film comment on this :D
well it's not like James Cameron himself doesn't have some much more personal ties to the franchise:


Yep, read that bit at the bottom there..."Directed by JAMES CAMERON"

[HEADING=1]BUUUUUUUURRRN!![/HEADING]
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
ultimateownage said:
Well said. James Cameron is a joke these days anyway, to quote myself:
ultimateownage said:
Oh fuck no. I hate James Cameron. Avatar was a shit movie being over hyped and earning way more than a movie should for something that's only selling point is 3d. Not to mention they're bringing it back with 8 extra minutes, just to cash it in further.
/James Cameron rant.
Reminds me or George Lucas. *shudder*

Why must Hollywood consume and destroy all that it creates? WHY!?!?
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
IronicBeet said:
Gordon_4 said:
IronicBeet said:
Right, because Dances With Wolves with blue cat people was WAY better.
Actually 'Last Samurai' is a more accurate comparison. 'Dances with Wolves', less so.

Look, Avatar was no story telling hero, which in truth let me down a little because usually Cameron is better than that. That said, I'd rather watch Avatar again than watch say, Revenge of the Fallen again.

However, for all the internet complaining that Avatar was crap etc, remember this: Cameron set out to make his movie the way he wanted. He has lived the dream of seeing a vision to completion. It's a rare feat.

Doesn't mean he isn't a huge dick when the mood takes him though :p
Eh, it is an alright movie I suppose, it's probably just that all the unnecessary praise it's been receiving (Not that it didn't deserve any at all) has turned me sour to the subject.
I think all the film needed was to say or imply a kind of "the future will be Fascist" like that there had been some nuclear war an quasi-nazis had overthrown all the democracies of the west, like with Starship Troopers... that would have been better than this forced bullshit of "no, YOUR country is fascist" trope.

I mean the capitalism-is-wrong message is laid so deep in the film "mah brother was killed, just for the paper in his pocket" it just begins to grate, and the utterly contrived corporate executive that makes the Jerk in Aliens seem like Chandler Bing. The film is just so contrived in getting things to PRECISELY fall in place to give such unfair justification for Jake and the Na'vi's actions.

My main problem was the Disney ending of them all being led away in chains... bullshit, that's a fucking cop out. It's almost identical to the ending of Disney's Pocahontas.

Jake didn't unite all the warriors tribes of Pandora against the humans just to let the humans walk away. What happens - in the CLEAR real life allegory of American Indians - is when they overtake the invader's stronghold they massacre every single one of the foreign invader's that they find there.

His girlfriend should have died at Quaritch's hand, he should have been consumed with rage to murder Quaritch even after disabling him and then taken part in the massacre and then at least the film would have ended with some pathos... Jake now alone on this alien planet, both literally and figuratively devoid of his humanity and reduced to an animalistic entity. And now with an uncertain future as this massacre won't go unavenged by Earth's military forces.

Then the next film would have an interesting starting off story, instead of telling the Pocahontis story it cold tell an allegory for Gerunimo. A story of armed struggle not against merely a well armed security detail of a mining company, but a super advanced space fleet. The Na'vi would have had no chance for their lack of knowledge of human warfighting... but Jake was a Marine (retcon to be a promising junior officer)... he knows how to fight and WIN a guerilla war.

The final film in the trilogy could be an allegory for modern day Africa, the Na'vi tribes have now armed themselves with the best human weapons and have won against the outside invaders but now their planet is a wreak: being torn apart by civil war over tribal differences, disease, ecological collapse and emigration... every Na'vi who has anything positive to give leaves for Earth or some other more promising star system*. The story could follow a now old Jake, trying to unite Pandora again for a brighter future embracing technology and industrialisation to care for the exploding population (ironically caused by when humans first came and gained their trust by introducing medicine to reduce infant mortality rate).

My problem with James Cameron's Avatar is if he is going to make an Allegory of America's Native Indians then he should have based it on the REALITY, not this liberal fantasy. Fantasy on top of fantasy while retaining allegorical allusions is only deceptive and disingenuous. There is no good side, massacres and brutality committed by both sides, just the winners and the losers.

(*part of the conclusion to the "war" of Avatar 2 could be Humanity coming in contact with another massive Alien empire that like Earth is expanding out exponentially consuming more and more resources of the Galaxy. A Cold War develops between them, all of a sudden this little planet of Pandora doesn't seem so important, especially when they find it's cheaper to mine "unobtanium" from some other planet.)
 

RobCoxxy

New member
Feb 22, 2009
2,036
0
0
It was intentionally bad, Piranha. So bad it was good, that's the point of more modern B-movies.

Granted, the 3d was kind of tacked on, but meh.

Best line in the film:

"It's the longest one I've ever seen!" (made me laugh, which set off a mexican wave of dirty-minded laughter throughout the room. Great fun)
 

VanityGirl

New member
Apr 29, 2009
3,472
0
0
Daemascus said:
3D: Avatar, YES
Piranha 3D, NO. Piranha 3D is a step backwards in 3D evolution.
^This

I don't mind 3D in certain films, like Avatar or How to Train Your Dragon... but most of the time it's used in a gimicky way (I'm looking at you Last Airbender and Piranha 3D).
 

ZippyDSMlee

New member
Sep 1, 2007
3,959
0
0
I'll take a bad but so bad its good film over a bad because its watered down by hollywood addicts trying to pretend to be real people anyday of the week!
 

jowo96

New member
Jan 14, 2010
346
0
0
In P
Dioxide20 said:
Daemascus said:
3D: Avatar, YES
Piranha 3D, NO
Agreed. I hate the 3D effects in these types of movies, the "OMG TEH (insert object here) IS COMIN RIGHT AT MAH FACE!!1!" effect is not what 3D should be used for.
I don't see why this is a problem at all, the 3D object in the face thing may be a cliche but almost every good movie uses cliche's, granted some movies use cliche to the point that there really isn't anything new or interesting in the movie but atleast when you have an object going into your face you notice the 3D difference rather than lifting up your glasses every so often to check to see if its still actually using 3D.
And secondly Camerons criticism is that it "reminds you of the bad 3D horror films from the 70s and 80s" which was the what the film was trying to do in the genre it was trying to emulate.

And yes I didn't like Piranah 3D, it wasn't for me but the idea that there is no place for this type of film is absurd.
Then again I wasn't a huge fan of Avatar either.
 

cefm

New member
Mar 26, 2010
380
0
0
Way to stay classy, Jimmy. Now why don't you and George Lucas go blow each other in the A/V server room, and get out of the way while someone who cares about PLOT and CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT makes a good film.
 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
I think the best example of 3D usage is Toy Story 3. Rather than throwing things in your face, it was just used to improve the backgrounds. Plus the film was good in every other respect, unlike Avatar which was weak in a few areas (it would have been more compelling if humans won, for instance).

But yeah I do not like green eggs and ham Piranha 3D much. It was kinda interesting yet incredibly forgettable, like The Expendables. The Expendables however, had great action scenes and cast.

Off topic here, but was/is Scott Pilgrim avaliable in 3D? I think that'd be good.
 

Terramax

New member
Jan 11, 2008
3,747
0
0
Well, from what I understand, Avatar isn't exactly Shakespear?

cefm said:
Way to stay classy, Jimmy. Now why don't you and George Lucas go blow each other in the A/V server room, and get out of the way while someone who cares about PLOT and CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT makes a good film.
I like this guy ^^