We need a female villain who cut d*cks to make everyone equal.Johnny Novgorod said:I'm just sad they presumably missed out on the excellent Batman games.
I wonder how that will affect Kotaku.Sceadu said:Didn't hear the news? http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/17/business/media/gawker-sale.htmlDreiko said:I guess after gawker going bankrupt they need every click they can get.
Actually if your good at it, you don't go out looking. You can have it brought to you. I know quite a few outrage drip feeds.erttheking said:Who is this? And more importantly, why does it matter? Seriously, do we have to actively go around looking for things to be mad about? I thought that was what SJWs did.
That's not a recent thing...Chimpzy said:Next up: Jezebel refuses to write the words 'woman', 'women' and 'she' anymore, because they respectively contain 'man', 'men' and 'he'. Film at eleven.
Womyn/womon/wimmin and their cousins are terms that have been around since the 1970s. They were coined by feminists to separate ?woman? and ?women? from their etymological roots in the words ?man? and ?men?. They were terms designed to free our gender from its patriarchal constraints.
One of these terms ? wom*n ? is undergoing a resurgence, particularly in Australian university women?s groups. The one at my uni had a vote last year to start using the asterisk.
http://www.mamamia.com.au/womyn-feminism-semantics/
Wait a minute... this logo doesn't even say "man"! It says "M/\N"! What does that mean? Why the outrage then? What is even happening anymore???Achelexus said:![]()
This macro was created like 2 weeks ago.
They've become satire of themselves lol