Thank you!! A side note to Stall. The sole objective of this video was a comical nerd rage based on exaggeration and the points of view of a knowledgeable and well informed journalist. If you didn't appreciate this kind of humor, refrain from watching. And it be nice to ask you who you are to be so informed about the stockholders and shareholders of NoA... Or are you only making assumptions on basic financial knowledge? Well only as slight remark to you my dear friend, bigger companies then NoA have fallen over bad marketing decisions... so I dunno extrapolate from that basic knowledge? (oh and just for the record I'm not a fan boy, i don't even knew these games existed and I do not own a wii).Feylynn said:You miss the point so I'll break it down.Stall said:It's this over idealized postulations of these corporations that kill me. Nintendo, Sony, MS... all of these guys... they aren't here to make you happy. They don't care what you want or think. They are here to cut a profit.
I had money.
They wanted money.
They had games.
I wanted games.
Now in math.
Money x Games = ?
Where: Games = Zero.
They don't care about me, I don't care about them very much right now.
They still own the equivalent of 47 solid gold planets and I'm an angry forum poster busy exercising my freedom of expression to other like minded bitter forum poster that happened to want these games.
Now I think we are having very different conversations here so I can give you my entire point in like 6 words.
"They did not take my money."
The end, there is nothing more to be gleaned from this data. The potential for money existed they chose to pay for that potential, and then not release the game.
Perhaps they did, but Jim did put some effort into trying to find reasons for their stupidity. Legions of fans make themselves heard, but all Nintendo will say publicly to them is "thanks for playing." ?? But I do agree that I'd like to see more evidence that Jim is doing his homework to find out what the Jarate is going on here.Stall said:Odds say NDA didn't do this out of spite: they had a legitmate reason for not bring these games over.
This shouldn't be a surprise, given their business practices from the mid-'80s to the early '90s. So many praise them for saving the gaming industry, yet those same people forget about the iron-fisted tactics Nintendo used on its third party companies, and how their business model was on the fast track to driving it all into the ground again. Competition, like touching, is good, but Nintendo was all about making sure there was no competition, while keeping their third party companies on a tight, costly leash. So yeah, they can be pretty prickish when they feel like it.the spud said:Wow. Nintendo can be pricks.
Some episodes he fails to properly explain himself, this one he succeeded with aplomb. He shows how well these sorts of games sell in the USA. That is profit AND being nice.Stall said:rasion d'etre of a corporation is to maximize profits for the shareholders: NOT to make you happy and be your BFF. Odds say NDA didn't do this out of spite: they had a legitmate reason for not bring these games over.
Sometimes Jim Sterling can make a good point,
At the time it might have but Fatal Frame didn't get fan translated for a while so I got a PS3 instead.Halo Fanboy said:japanvideogames dot com, videogameimports dot com ect ect. Does that solve your problem?