Hey, if the developers can stick it out on their own, more power to them. I'm not rooting against them, far from it. But still, Jim's reaction to SOPA and et al. seems disproportionate and childish. Besides, I think you and Jim have missed a really important fact here which I already touched on--the vast majority of pirates don't actually care if a game was released by a big publisher or not. They just want free stuff. Simple as that. Giving developers more control over their IP's won't make a lick of difference over how much their games are pirated. In fact, I'd call Jim's complaint a pointless distraction from the real issues of piracy and should have been addressed as a completely different issue.FEichinger said:Of course, I picked my quotes. But there is this motion, and it is quite apparent. On the other hand, of course, publishers are still needed in one way or the other. But they have way too much impact as it stands.
Proven to be? What are you smoking? MegaUpload's owners ARE IN PRISON. I can't think of a clearer message to send to anyone who wants to run a website where someone else's copyrighted work is put up for anyone to download. Sure, pirates can shuffle the files elsewhere... until those sites get shut down, too, or their administrators realize that they have to diligently filter out copyrighted material or else they'll also suffer the same fate of MegaUpload. And the more piracy sites that get shut down, the better. Soon, pirating will become too difficult, aggravating, and even dangerous for casual Internet users. Anonymous's little hissy fits may grab headlines but aren't going to stop this from happening. That's your future, chum, hope you're looking forward to it.As for the anti-piracy measures ... Need to be blunt: Plain wrong. Shutting down torrent sites is just as counter-productive as the shutdown of Mega has proven to be. The files still exist and can easily be moved somewhere else. And it caused a massive amount of collateral damage up to this day already, and will do so even more when the servers can't be paid for anymore to keep the data living for the time being.
So, sorry, but the whole idea that enforcing the law just makes a problem worse doesn't apply here anymore than it does in any other crime. No, you can't stop everyone from prostituting themselves, selling drugs, shoplifting, or vandalizing city streets. However, that's no excuse not to even try, and besides, with no enforcement at all, all of those crimes would be much more prevalent. It's the same idea here. Yes, better enforcement won't stop piracy completely, but it can curtail it, which is the whole point. Honestly, I don't see why this is so hard to understand. There's nothing new about the idea of stopping someone from taking something that doesn't belong to them.