And you wonder why we don't give a shit about Europe.... Unlike you I will not generalize, however, for I know there are many Europeans who understand what America has done for the world at large and continues to do. Your ilk makes me sick though.Rev Erebus said:Its America its run by retards what do you expect.
It's on your escapist profile sir, very much public domain.Rev Erebus said:This is Escapist i would like for you to not post my Twitters here please.Velocirapture07 said:And you wonder why we don't give a shit about Europe.... Unlike you I will not generalize, however, for I know there are many Europeans who understand what America has done for the world at large and continues to do. Your ilk makes me sick though.Rev Erebus said:Its America its run by retards what do you expect.
Rev Erebus' twitter postings which appear on his profile page here include the words "death to America". What a wonderful sentiment. I would respond in kind, but then that would be stooping to your level which I will not do.
i know seriosly, i'ts not like its the new Bible or something, although there are people who pracice Jedism so i guess more people are being idiots AGAIN!Bernzz said:Is it bad of me that I laughed out loud when I read that?
Fuckin' idiotic people, though. It's a friggin' BOOK!
Really?. I could have sworn been accused of withcraft to be more of an "obvious point of debate" here rather than the merits of an author.rossatdi said:Well I think that was the obvious point of debate!Skarin said:Or you know, you all can continue discussing the fact that she was not worthy of the award in the first place.
After all which is more unusual?
1) Bush administration pandering to the moronic right wing fuck bags from the bible belt and his own 'born again' Christianity.
~or~
2) A British author of twee childrens' books being given the highest order that the US President is able to bestow.
Well, as much as I would love to argue conjecture here I would rather use some simple logic.PhiMed said:I think there's an important distinction between "was denied" and "did not receive". The second phrase is undeniable, but as for the first...Skarin said:Well she was denied the honour. The specifics entailed in that statement is never mentioned in the source so we can only speculate what "taken away" means here.PhiMed said:As far as her having her award "taken away", did she really? She didn't meet the criteria for the award anyway. You listed a description of the qualifications for the award, and she doesn't meet a single one of them.
You do raise a valid point though, just because it was reported by the media does not make it the truth. Somehow though, there is this lingering suspicion in my mind about the what if....what if it is true?.
Can someone be preposterous enough to claim witchcraft?. I wouldn't put it past anyone I met on the street let alone a politician.
Based on the criteria for the award that you snipped, she should not have been considered for the award in the first place. She fails to meet a single stipulation for candidacy. If the stated reasons for her removal from consideration are true, then this is a story. Otherwise, this is comparable to someone not receiving a Nobel Prize for science based on their work feeding the needy on the West Bank. Sure, what they did was admirable, but the award is completely unrelated to their endeavors.
While the claim that our former president gave creedence to charges of condoning witchcraft is certainly disturbing, it feels remarkably like piling on an administration that has enough legitimate and demonstrable criticisms that could be levied against it as it is. Unless hard evidence is put forward that this is true, I'll continue to view this as an attempt to profit from otherwise well-earned intense anti-Bush sentiment.
No that Germany's top honor!. Jeez, get it right!George Palmer said:"JK Rowling denied top US honor"
She was denied membership into the National Sausage Makers Guild?
What assholes!
She turned me into a newt!!heyheysg said:Does she weigh the same as a duck?