The UK libel and defamation laws are some of the widest and most accessible in the world. That's why the rest of the world comes here when they want to sue for defamation.Reverend Del said:Right a few answers to some questions. First up, to the user who commented about this being libel, I'm fairly sure it's not. I believe libel requires material damage to reputation via the medium of printed word. (although thankfully this doesn't apply to forum/message boards) Rockstar would have to prove that their reputation was damaged by this article. Given that it generally won't be I don't think there's grounds for libel. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
It's blatantly untrue, certainly. But unfortunately that's not actually illegal as such in this country. We have the Press Complaint's Commission who, as has been presented in this very thread, have a Code of Conduct. Now papers are supposed to abide by this, it covers false stories, handling grieving families with compassion and a host of other stuff. It's not mandatory and even if a newspaper does breach it the PCC has no ability to levy any kind of punishment which would hurt. So as a result newspapers like the Star can and do print whatever they like. If they do get collared they print a tiny retraction and laugh about it. Most tabloid papers find it hard to even admit fault in those.
I did a bit on this on my tort module this year. As far as I can tell, if they wanted to, Rockstar would certainly have a case here, at least as far as the legal theory is concerned.