I'm no expert on the matter, but I swear I've seen Triceratops fossils in museums.Merkavar said:will they have triceratops? didnt they find that they never existed?
Well, Triceratops did exist...AngloDoom said:I'm no expert on the matter, but I swear I've seen Triceratops fossils in museums.Merkavar said:will they have triceratops? didnt they find that they never existed?
Either way, after the third film I really don't care. Hell, it might even become fantastic once again but I'm pretty sure it's going to be a Cretaceous wank-off.
I hate to break it to you, but the author of the books is dead. I preferred Michael Crichton's cut of Jurassic Park II, hopefully they don't screw up his legacy with a shitty reboot. I will definitely go see this movie if I hear that they gave Velociraptor feathers.chickenhound said:at first I was like WHAT HELL NO but Spielberg is the one making the reboot plus the author of the books is in on it so.. it will probably at least not suck..
It actually came out in '93 so thats goddamn near 18 years since the first one came out and the third one was just awful. I can see why they want to give it the old reboot. I'll most definately see it unless something in the trailer is so egregious that I find myself disgusted and put off from seeing it. (Though I'm pretty certain I'll see it anyways). Maybe after it I'll know how all those Transformers fans from the '80s feel about Michael Bay blowing up all their childhood memories. (I enjoyed both Transformers movies and I plan to see the third)Cakes said:I know we live in a world of sequels and reboots, but wasn't Jurassic Park like a decade ago? Isn't it a little premature?
It actually came out in '93 so thats goddamn near 18 years since the first one came out and the third one was just awful. I can see why they want to give it the old reboot. I'll most definately see it unless something in the trailer is so egregious that I find myself disgusted and put off from seeing it. (Though I'm pretty certain I'll see it anyways). Maybe after it I'll know how all those Transformers fans from the '80s feel about Michael Bay blowing up all their childhood memories. (I enjoyed both Transformers movies and I plan to see the third)Cakes said:I know we live in a world of sequels and reboots, but wasn't Jurassic Park like a decade ago? Isn't it a little premature?
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2010/08/the-triceratops-never-existed/ there are heaps of other sources. basically some scientist think triceratops is actually just the baby version of this other dinosuarAngloDoom said:I'm no expert on the matter, but I swear I've seen Triceratops fossils in museums.Merkavar said:will they have triceratops? didnt they find that they never existed?
Well if the feathers could have been used for a lot of other things for instance increased streamlinedness increasing speed.Coffinshaker said:heh, looks cool! though it's a hard concept to sell. I mean, feathers are highly specialized, so unless they evolved FROM a bird, then I have a hard time conceptualizing that idea. what I mean is... feathers are very advanced "technology" err... biology rather; they lock together, they are light, all kinds of stuff to make you fly. so unless they were programmed to evolve into birds in a few million years, a feather as we know it is probably not what they had. though, I wouldn't doubt they had something similar... like, whatever you could imagine the prefeather to be... probably more hoarse and hairlike.Hero in a half shell said:Will they be following the latest scientific theory that velociraptors and most other dinosaurs were likely to have had feathers?
![]()
hmm... what was the topic again?
oh right, JP... yeah, I loved those movies and books. lets reboot! though they should always include Jeff Goldbloom(sp?) in there.
Actually i liked number 2 almost as much as number one, your correct about number 3 but if anything they should reboot that! make it betterNavvan said:It is indeed a cash in. However, the franchise is not fine where it is. Only #1 should exist, #2 was passable but not nearly as good, and #3 should never have seen the light of day.chickenlord said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_7WiXKakAQ&feature=feedu
This is were i found out... In my opinion this reboot is unneeded and unwanted. Its just another way to get our money and i for one am not falling for it. The franchise is fine were its at and there is no need to reboot it... in my opinion the special effects are fucking twice as good as what we have in "modern" movies... i dont see the point other then to make money...