You seemed to ignore my final say on the matter.BloatedGuppy said:It might be just me, but I don't think this is a question of "sexy" vs "sexless". Perhaps I'm in a minority, but I don't find itsy bitsy chainmail bikinis and tits the size of hot air balloons to be the living definition of "sexy". It's not about being PRUDISH. I'll defend the (voluminous) quantities of nudity in Witcher 2, for example. There's something very...juvenile...about the approach to sexuality on display in that Tera art. That's the issue. For me, anyway. I don't think it's evil, but it certainly invites mockery.HorrendusOne said:I'd like to say I know quite a few female artists some of which prefer to draw fantasy in a sexy manner rather then a realistic manner simple due to personal taste.
"It's really what you make of it. I mean I CAN look at it and see something, attractive, disgusting, silly, childish, egotistical,sexy, prudish, hot, normal, skimpy, mocking, juvenile etc. However a single perspective is just that.... a perspective."
There are so many perspectives that I see no reason to accept my own and reject all others. In my opinion each one is equally valid. Yes in we are both wrong yet both right. Double standards are in-moral not impossible.