I (unlike may people it seems) never actually reverted to print once I started writing in cursive. By the time it stopped being enforced on me I was kinda just used to it. Huh.
Dude, its Kansas. Its a state that Americans forget it exists.Evil Smurf said:proper handwritting is an art! Silly America
I'm exactly the same. I learned "joined up" handwriting when I was about 6 or 7 and have always used it ever since. I have known a few people who write in print (all in capitals as well oddly enough) but I just found that slow and tedious compared to cursive which was just tedious. The only kids who wrote in print all the way up to when I left finished A levels in 2003 were those considered "Special". For everyone else, it had to be cursive or typedRainmaker77 said:UK here.
Cursive or 'joined up writing' as we call it here is definitely the norm, so much so that I can't actually recall reading anything hand written recently that was not.
It's so engrained to me that I actually struggle printing my name on documents, I simply don't naturally write like that and it's an effort to do so.
National past-time.Gatx said:Also you people from the UK, so condescending.
Holy crap, a time traveler from the past! How are you sir and what decade do you hail from?neverarine said:some of theses people are gonna meet a harsh reality when they hit that university professor who only accepts work written in cursive and who only writes in it, there always is one...
ie, from what you're saying I can surmise that you could "Touch-type", though you prefer to look at the keys, which is not what I was saying (As I elaborated with the hide-and-seek referral).PhunkyPhazon said:Actually, I do look at the keys when I type. Not because I can't type without doing so, but because I just do it faster this way.
You seem to be forgetting that the keyboards have been around a lot less than mass writing has, and that kids who were born after the internet born are just shy of being in puberty/ slightly over right now.Zack Alklazaris said:The only thing I have ever had to do is sign my name in cursive and even that you can pretty much write whatever the fuck you want as long as your consistent about it.
Take cursive out and get kids typing. We have kids born AFTER the internet boom who still type with their indexes at 35 wpm. Its sad.
The web took off publicly in the early 90s, making "kids who were born after the internet" around 20...Not being shy of puberty.Sizzle Montyjing said:You seem to be forgetting that the keyboards have been around a lot less than mass writing has, and that kids who were born after the internet born are just shy of being in puberty/ slightly over right now.Zack Alklazaris said:The only thing I have ever had to do is sign my name in cursive and even that you can pretty much write whatever the fuck you want as long as your consistent about it.
Take cursive out and get kids typing. We have kids born AFTER the internet boom who still type with their indexes at 35 wpm. Its sad.
I use cursive mostly, although I don't join up all the words, I write in my own style really which has just evolved from everyone acknowledging that English classes were mostly bullshit, hell, I learnt more about paragraph structure and writing good answers from History GCSE than I did English.
It's not ordinary though as most languages do not connect entire words into one long swirly line. And again, as mentioned over and over in this thread...It's not just America, it's the majority of the world with the exception of England and parts (yes, only parts) of Australia.Olrod said:In school we were taught to write with joined-up letters as standard. Writing each letter individually is considered to be something only small children do.
Only in America can they regard something as ordinary as writing without needing to stop-start all the time as something "special" and call it cursive.
Even if they were just hitting puberty I was typing 80wpm at 14. Granted I did embrace computers like they were my religion, but still kids still take computer classes I assume?Locke_Cole said:The web took off publicly in the early 90s, making "kids who were born after the internet" around 20...Not being shy of puberty.Sizzle Montyjing said:You seem to be forgetting that the keyboards have been around a lot less than mass writing has, and that kids who were born after the internet born are just shy of being in puberty/ slightly over right now.Zack Alklazaris said:The only thing I have ever had to do is sign my name in cursive and even that you can pretty much write whatever the fuck you want as long as your consistent about it.
Take cursive out and get kids typing. We have kids born AFTER the internet boom who still type with their indexes at 35 wpm. Its sad.
I use cursive mostly, although I don't join up all the words, I write in my own style really which has just evolved from everyone acknowledging that English classes were mostly bullshit, hell, I learnt more about paragraph structure and writing good answers from History GCSE than I did English.
A suggestion which would have roughly the same result as the current method, but be much, much more labour intensive. The current method teaches the same proficiency (blind typing) faster to one unaccustomed to doing so, and is therefore the better pedagogic method.Joccaren said:Cursive is still a thing?
I remember being told that I had to 'graduate' to joined writing in year 3 & 4, but after that I went straight back to print. Its 1000% more legible [And whilst normally this would be an exaggeration, for me its not], and for me faster too; I don't have to worry about where each letter joins to, whether I can read what I just wrote, or any other number of things. I just write one word, slightly lift my pencil, and move it to the starting position of the next word.
At the same time, I think typing classes are pointless too.
My school tried to teach me touch typing one time with the fastest typing teacher in the school. I never listened to her, and just typed the way I always have. When she called me up on it, I told her I didn't need to place my fingers in certain positions to know where all the keys are, I knew from experience. To try and prove to me I was wrong, she challenged me to type out some sentence faster than she could. I did. Touch typing may help some people, but IMO a subconscious knowledge of the keyboard not tied to certain positions of your hands is more important.
I normally rest all my fingers on the spacebar as its a nice, relaxed position, and I have no need to place my fingers in certain positions to know where the keys are - if anything trying to do so slows me down. I just move my hands to wherever they need to be. If I'm typing predominantly on one side of the keyboard, my hands will both be more over that side, but thanks to the QWERTY layout they're generally pretty evenly distributed. I never look at the keyboard, and make no mistakes whilst typing unless I let my brain get ahead of my fingers, and start typing 3-4 letters ahead by accident. Typing lessons, IMO, should just be getting people to constantly type at a keyboard and write up large blocks of text, or play lots of keyboard intensive games so that they subconsciously learn the layout of the keyboard, 'cause that's a useful skill to have sometimes.
Carry on my friend, for you are truly a stellar example of humour and cleverness. Everyone else's opinion is but dust in the wind.Reginald said:I think cursive should carry on (wayward son). Writing in cursive is faster and more efficient than printing when it comes to expressing what's on your mind, and it looks fine so long as you don't have wacky spaz hands. Many a magnum opus has been penned in cursive, and it was used to answer many questions of my childhood without any real problems. Cursive is one of those miracles out of nowhere, and it should be preserved.