Great, you made me laugh at a dismemberment joke, now I just feel a stab of guiltMatthew94 said:
Killing spree in Hungary... with a twist
- Thread starter ElPatron
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Can a mod please shut this thread down. I've read the first page and every comment is just taking cheap shots at it. I find it reprehensible that a bunch of people can just make fun of the fact that someone did despicable things to their family. None of these individuals have done anything relating to a discussion regarding this matter.
Gunfire isn't a matter of pointing and shooting.C F said:
Of course, melee weapons take the most brutal approach. I have seen people on the Escapist who consider firearms too violent and brutal - we should defend our homes with baseball bats! LOGIC!
There is a lot of emotional baggage when pointing a gun at someone. During WWI it was found that most people will not shoot the first time they have an enemy on their sights. That's where the "silhouette" targets come from.
Anyway, it takes a special kind of brutality to point a loaded gun at someone unless you're a kid and you don't understand the consequences.
Oh, so you are cherry picking?Chairman Miaow said:
Jia Yingmin - 12 kills, 2000
Bai Ningyang - 12 kills, 5 injuried, 2006
Wirjo - 20 kills, 12 wounded, 1987 (Again, because you missed it)
Unknown (Ukraine) - 7 deaths, unknown wounded, 1997
Shi Yuejun - 12 kills, 5 wounded, 2006
Duong Van Mon - 12 kills, 6 wounded, 1998
Qiu Xinghua - 11 kills, 2 wounded, 2006
Soldiers going off to war? Oh, yeah.ElPatron said:
People who never wanted to kill, but are put in the situation anyway? That's an ordeal.
But we're talking about a muderer here, someone whose actions are likely driven out of pent-up spite against their target. While it's far from any actual justifaction, I'm assuming it at least makes the choice to point a loaded gun (or in this case, go all hack-and-slash) at them easier. Perhaps it's unfair of me to do so, but I never expect a murderer to worry about morality or act the way any other human would.
You do know that the Allies were convinced that the Axis soldiers would invade hospitals and burn sick people alive, throw babies in the air and stab them with bayonets, right?C F said:
The Germans thought the Allies would gauge off the eyes of the soldiers they captured and spread them in bread.
In Vietnam, the rate of people willing to shoot was 75%.
So much for people "who never wanted to kill".
That's an observation I have found as well. If we take into account that the people serving in the US are volunteers and grew up in the 80's-90's, their condition to shoot for the first time is very high because of superior training methods... and the fact that they are very likely to have been exposed to videogames, which allows some people to ease in the idea of killing humans.Liquidacid23 said:
After it, some people will laugh at how the target trip and fell, some won't sleep at night.
I still think that to untrained people shooting is quite personal, specially if they are from the same city. Not the same thing as being sent thousands of miles away to do it.
It's disgraceful, I agree.FoolKiller said:
Mods, I would appreciate it if you would razor attention to this thread and lock it.
Making sword puns, man whatever happened to sharp wit? These puns are almost like Nazi jokes, Anne Frankly they are starting to get just as dull.
Shame he had to cut so many people from his life. :c
EDIT: I'm going to Hell aren't I?
Shame he had to cut so many people from his life. :c
EDIT: I'm going to Hell aren't I?
you people ***** at American for guns, yet this guy was able to get a killing spree with a damn sword?