Eric the Orange said:
Keoul said:
I think these "jerks" are just attracted to anywhere with a form of competition.
Well that may explain MobA games and XBL, but It doesn't explain Blizzard fan forums.
Well, you see, the thing about the Blizzard "fanboys" is that the majority of them are the elitist/purist type who believe that WoW has been going downhill ever since
Burning Crusade.
(Protip: 40-man raiding in Classic WoW sucked. Only one class could
actually tank, only one class could
actually heal, paladins were used for little more than buffing, and half of the damage classes couldn't damage
enough. That's not even counting the number of times you could actually get 40 people from the same guild online all at once, assuming you're not in a massive guild that was almost singularly dedicated to raiding, or the number of times you'd need to PUG half the raid and end up wiping the entire night because the people you picked up didn't know what to do.)
Now, my personal feelings about the game aside, most of these people get outraged every time a new content patch is brought up or game changes are addressed, because change is a very bad thing, you know. Cries of things like "RUINED 4EVAR!!!" and "Worst thing to happen since WotLK LOL" are not all that uncommon. People are saying that WoW is jumping the shark by including pandas as a playable race - Despite them having had anthropomorphic cows and blue space goats and reanimated corpses along with the classic two styles of elves, humans, orcs, trolls, gnomes, dwarves, etc. for years and years.
They also seem to have forgotten that Starcraft II was pretty overwhelmingly received positively, short of the lack of LAN play (Was there any outrage over being locked out of the skirmish mode if you weren't connected to Battle.net? I can't remember). Again, my personal feelings aside (I'm not a huge fan of the RTS genre), SCII was an incredibly well-put-together game, with a computer AI that has a learning curve like trying to run up a solid brick wall with your head.
But they're owned by Activision, so obviously it's impossible that they could ever release anything more than mediocre ever again, right? Diablo III is obviously going to suck, because Diablo I&II were some of the most lauded dungeon crawlers ever created!
But it requires a constant online connection, it must be spawned by the devil himself! Do I think you should be allowed to play the single-player campaign or whatever it will be even while you're not connected? Yeah, sure, but I'm not going to get outraged over the same DRM they've been using for years. It's not like it has that much of an impact on my life - if I can't play Diablo III I'll play something else until I can again if I really want to that badly.
It has an optional Auction House for real-money transactions, how dare they! This isn't a F2P game! I haven't really been paying any attention to the complaints over the last few months, so I don't know if it's the same as it was when the AH was first announced or if they've changed it by now, but my understanding of it was that it was a completely optional addition that allowed players to put gear they found in the game up for sale to other players who might want it. I could be wrong, but I assume that means that it would have little-to-no effect on anyone who doesn't wish to participate in that particular part of the game. They're not forcing you to buy anything.
Er. . . am I still on-topic? I don't know, I'll stop now. I really think I just need to take a break from the internet, all of the hatred and complaining is really just making me tired, and it's the internet so it never ends.
Captcha: (After three reloads): "know your rights" - I do, Captcha. That's why I made you reload away from those stupid car ads.