Oh, so the LHC doesn't create black holes, but it mindf***s people in the present who will understand it an hour before? No, wait. Isn't this the present? I'm so confused.
Understatement of the year, in my opinion. It's a theory on a theory on a theory on a loosely-proven guideline at this point. Wake me up when nothing major happens and they get over all the hullabaloo.Tom Goldman said:Weiler describes the theory as a "long shot,"
well played boytimeadept said:The question is though... can we understand it if we don't tamper with it?http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/the_difference.pngklaynexas3 said:well that depends on how you view time to work. perhaps it would only create an alternate time line in which the event didn't occur. while, if this is how time works then it wouldn't matter for shit cause then there would be an alternate time line for that anyway, just without the note. now if you view it as a set in stone type thing then maybe time travel is possible, it's just that it was supposed to happen, like in Harry Potter. time's a confusing thing, and i don't think we should try to tamper with it until we do understand it. so i think that even if this were to work, and it makes a time machine, then he should automatically smash it, in order to prevent anything bad from happening.phoenix352 said:AmrasCalmacil said:Part of me doesn't like the sound of this. Personally I'd rather leave time travel to The Doctor.
At least we're not gonna send anyone through it to mess up history.
sending anything can get the same result ....
if i send a message to say 1937 and tell them .. kill this Hitler fellow , hes a douche in the making. the entire earth will change.
time travel is just a big ass paradox , also if this is a potential time machine in Theory the fact that we have no messages from the future at this very moment proves we dont invent a time machine ever...
(btw how do i post an image? so i can get rid of this link.)