Larry Nassar sentenced to 100 years minimum for sex abuse scandal

Recommended Videos

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
Addendum_Forthcoming said:
After over 200 cases, it seems as if a systemic failure of safeguards at that point. As in all the people that should have cotton on didn't.
Business as usual, then. 200 cases is quite a lot, but it's hardly unusual for abusers to get away with loads of victims for years without the right people knowing, or more often, caring.
 

Silentpony_v1legacy

Alleged Feather-Rustler
Jun 5, 2013
6,760
0
0
Kreett said:
Silentpony said:
altnameJag said:
Guilty pleas usually take the death penalty off the table, and we've got a bad habit of downplaying sexual assault.

Even when it's a guilty plea for Child Pornography and molesting upwards of 250 children left in his care.

Fuck that guy. He's lucky we live in a nation of laws.
The problem is when the judge said it was her privilege to sentence him to die in jail she may have violated the impartiality rules of being a judge, going from justice to vengeance. And any good appeals lawyer will bring that up and have his sentence cut in half or a new trial ordered, arguing the judge was against him, rather than pro-justice.
But she's a Judge, delivering the people's judgement on a criminal that is both confirmed to have committed the crime and will *puts on sunglasses* do the time, I think she's allowed a little bit of scorn once the sentencing by jury is done and the punishment decided on.
You'd think, but actually not. Judges are on a very tight leash in what they can say and imply, and during the sentencing she said she wished she could do something cruel and unusual to him, but since she couldn't she "signed his death warrant"
And that is so not allowed. Because by her own admission she wants to torture him, and any appeals lawyer will take that as state-of-mind and intent and have her entire sentence thrown out.
 

Aiddon_v1legacy

New member
Nov 19, 2009
3,672
0
0
I do love that video from last week of one of the victims' father lunging for the creep. Nassar will live the rest of his life in fear, as he should
 

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0
Avnger said:
Samtemdo8 said:
The Rogue Wolf said:
.

Now I want them to expand the investigation and put everyone who ever enabled this guy in cages too.
If you start going after this guy's friends who enabled him to continue his behavior? Than would you expand it to arrest the enabler's families and friends aswell?

Do we have also have to arrest Larry Nassar's family members down to distant cousins twice removed?

When does it end?
It ends with the people who directly enabled him? An accomplice to a crime is still a criminal under law.

This isn't some crazy idea here. People who allowed this monster to assault children for whatever reasons deserve to sit alongside him in jail. They won't end up getting the same sentence as him because they didn't commit the actual act, but they deserve long lockups for giving this predator the ability to continue his attacks.

Also between this post of yours and your original one in the thread, I almost get the feeling like you have a problem with how this shitstain is receiving his punishment.
My first post was genuine, I litirally never heard of this guy until this thread. This Larry guy can stay in jail for all he can.

I just have a problem when people suggests to arrests potential accomplicies because where do you stop at that point, is Larry Nasser's second cousin twice removed guilty of enableing him, is the child of Larry Nasser's friend who enabled him guilty of this?

Lets just say I don't like "Guilty by association" when it goes too far.
 

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
6,974
5,379
118
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Not playing the devil?s advocate here; I?m not one of those people who bucks opinions held by others just for its own sake and even less to pass judgement of others, but I find it hard to believe anyone would think the parents were complicit in Nassar?s wrong doings. I highly doubt that the parents of nigh unto 200 girls (that?s 400 supposedly loving, providing adults) would willing send their children to slaughter for a chance at Olympic fame. My thoughts are that these children were just that: children. Gymnastics is likely something they love and strive to do their best at, and then they had this adult in a position of authority, someone whose job it was to know and assess their bodies and wellbeing, taking advantage of that position. People forget, molestation isn?t always an overt act of brutish violence done by a stranger; it?s often done by someone children know and trust, and even if a child doesn?t feel comfortable with acts of sexual abuse, they have to reconcile in their own, young minds how someone they trust and supposedly cares about them can do the things they do to them. The fact is Nasser had unique access to these young women which he exploited; if any of them came forward to their parents (and I?m sure there were some,) it wasn?t likely so blunt as ?he?s molesting me? and their parents saying ?too bad, so sad; deal with it for the glory.? They likely made excuses not to want to go, maybe asked not to be in gymnastics anymore, and any parents thinking they were running away from the struggle of strict practice regimens encouraging their daughters to stick with it because no parent wants their child to give up something they can do well at simply because it?s hard to do.

And I?m speaking from second-hand experience, if I can qualify my thoughts. My girlfriend, now in her early 40s, admitted something to me that happened to her when she was a young teenager; it?s something that she never directly addressed with the offending person (now dead) or anyone who might have been in a position to do anything about it had they known it had happened. She told me how she really didn?t understand, at that age, how this person could mean to hurt her, and in sick way, forgave him though she has learned in decades since there was nothing to forgive, that she was a victim. We?ve talked about this Nasser nonsense, and she feels for these young women, that coupled with the pressures of training and practice to be in the Olympics, Nasser was able to operate and do these sick things likely unquestioned, abusing the trust and high regard within these girls held him. Nasser is a monster, and before we spin off on speculations that the rabbit hole goes deeper or suggesting other involved, I?m comfortable knowing this human garbage is getting his just desserts. Besides, if the problem IS bigger than just him the song bird would have been singing a long time ago, if only to catch a break from the prosecution. I know I wouldn?t go down alone as a child molester if there was anyone else of note to share the blame; another poster is correct; if you?re looking for the complete dregs of human decency, prison is the best place to start, and despite the myriad offences that land so many in there, child molestation is the LAST one anyone would want to find themselves in there for; neither side of the bars let?s that shit fly. Nasser should have REQUESTED the death penalty.
 

Neurotic Void Melody

Bound to escape
Legacy
Jul 15, 2013
4,953
6
13
oki, other than agreeing less eloquently with McMorrow and Addendum's posts, I seriously gotta ask; so...ummm, what's the dealio with the OP's name and post here? Is this an official Nassar sentence news update bot account or what?
 

Avnger

Trash Goblin
Legacy
Apr 1, 2016
2,124
1,251
118
Country
United States
Samtemdo8 said:
Avnger said:
Samtemdo8 said:
The Rogue Wolf said:
.

Now I want them to expand the investigation and put everyone who ever enabled this guy in cages too.
If you start going after this guy's friends who enabled him to continue his behavior? Than would you expand it to arrest the enabler's families and friends aswell?

Do we have also have to arrest Larry Nassar's family members down to distant cousins twice removed?

When does it end?
It ends with the people who directly enabled him? An accomplice to a crime is still a criminal under law.

This isn't some crazy idea here. People who allowed this monster to assault children for whatever reasons deserve to sit alongside him in jail. They won't end up getting the same sentence as him because they didn't commit the actual act, but they deserve long lockups for giving this predator the ability to continue his attacks.

Also between this post of yours and your original one in the thread, I almost get the feeling like you have a problem with how this shitstain is receiving his punishment.
My first post was genuine, I litirally never heard of this guy until this thread. This Larry guy can stay in jail for all he can.

I just have a problem when people suggests to arrests potential accomplicies because where do you stop at that point, is Larry Nasser's second cousin twice removed guilty of enableing him, is the child of Larry Nasser's friend who enabled him guilty of this?

Lets just say I don't like "Guilty by association" when it goes too far.
Then you don't understand what is meant by being an accomplice or an accessory to a crime. Your ridiculous scenarios almost make me feel like I should pull out that Billy Madison contest quote.

This isn't "guilt by association" in any, way, shape, or form. This is guilt by action (or inaction) in association with.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_(legal_term)#United_States
 

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0
Avnger said:
Samtemdo8 said:
Avnger said:
Samtemdo8 said:
The Rogue Wolf said:
.

Now I want them to expand the investigation and put everyone who ever enabled this guy in cages too.
If you start going after this guy's friends who enabled him to continue his behavior? Than would you expand it to arrest the enabler's families and friends aswell?

Do we have also have to arrest Larry Nassar's family members down to distant cousins twice removed?

When does it end?
It ends with the people who directly enabled him? An accomplice to a crime is still a criminal under law.

This isn't some crazy idea here. People who allowed this monster to assault children for whatever reasons deserve to sit alongside him in jail. They won't end up getting the same sentence as him because they didn't commit the actual act, but they deserve long lockups for giving this predator the ability to continue his attacks.

Also between this post of yours and your original one in the thread, I almost get the feeling like you have a problem with how this shitstain is receiving his punishment.
My first post was genuine, I litirally never heard of this guy until this thread. This Larry guy can stay in jail for all he can.

I just have a problem when people suggests to arrests potential accomplicies because where do you stop at that point, is Larry Nasser's second cousin twice removed guilty of enableing him, is the child of Larry Nasser's friend who enabled him guilty of this?

Lets just say I don't like "Guilty by association" when it goes too far.
Then you don't understand what is meant by being an accomplice or an accessory to a crime. Your ridiculous scenarios almost make me feel like I should pull out that Billy Madison contest quote.

This isn't "guilt by association" in any, way, shape, or form. This is guilt by action (or inaction) in association with.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_(legal_term)#United_States
Ok than I get your point, but now the question is were there human accessories involved or did Larry Nassar acted alone?

Also what was the quote from Billy Madison you were thinking of?
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
Vanilla ISIS said:
He'll get shanked within the first 2 years so the length of the sentence doesn't matter.
Exactly. People like Larry are fodder for serial killers who will never be released from federal prisons to either try and get the guards to send them off early or build a little more reputation among the inmates.
 

2012 Wont Happen

New member
Aug 12, 2009
4,286
0
0
Silentpony said:
Kreett said:
Silentpony said:
altnameJag said:
Guilty pleas usually take the death penalty off the table, and we've got a bad habit of downplaying sexual assault.

Even when it's a guilty plea for Child Pornography and molesting upwards of 250 children left in his care.

Fuck that guy. He's lucky we live in a nation of laws.
The problem is when the judge said it was her privilege to sentence him to die in jail she may have violated the impartiality rules of being a judge, going from justice to vengeance. And any good appeals lawyer will bring that up and have his sentence cut in half or a new trial ordered, arguing the judge was against him, rather than pro-justice.
But she's a Judge, delivering the people's judgement on a criminal that is both confirmed to have committed the crime and will *puts on sunglasses* do the time, I think she's allowed a little bit of scorn once the sentencing by jury is done and the punishment decided on.
You'd think, but actually not. Judges are on a very tight leash in what they can say and imply, and during the sentencing she said she wished she could do something cruel and unusual to him, but since she couldn't she "signed his death warrant"
And that is so not allowed. Because by her own admission she wants to torture him, and any appeals lawyer will take that as state-of-mind and intent and have her entire sentence thrown out.
Maybe, but not likely. Judges have to be impartial during the actual trial, but are usually not impartial during sentencing. Indeed, considering there is a range of possible sentences for any given crime, a judge is to a degree supposed to make value judgements about the convict during sentencing to determine on which side of that range their punishment will fall.