Yhea, but they are the ones bothering me most.tkioz said:To be fair Christians are no where near the worst offenders on that subjectEldarion said:I'd make church and state separation mean something. No more Christians forcing their religious views on the entire country.![]()
I really like this one. I've seen Fox news tell the most spurious lies all the time and then their retraction is one muttered word through some third-hand outlet that they never play up a hundredth as much as the 500 cumulative hours across 400 shows they told the lie.tkioz said:Retractions must be equal to original coverage.
A media law that I thought up after seeing news papers and TV shows slander the hell out of people then print a retraction to a frontpage story on page 28 in a tiny box, or in the last seconds of a news program after the weather when everyone has switched to another station. With this law if a news paper slashes a huge frontpage story filled with lies, they must publish an equal retraction.
Punishment for failure to obey this law: Loss of a the smallest finger remaining on your dominate hand.
I'd just like to point out the gigantic amount of irony I found after looking at your probation post.Hunter15 said:all internet trolls must burn their hands off if they start trolling
You saw that? I reported that post.Radeonx said:I'd just like to point out the gigantic amount of irony I found after looking at your probation post.Hunter15 said:all internet trolls must burn their hands off if they start trolling
This man is a genius. Put him in charge.Ghengis John said:1.UELA's (User End License Agreements) Must be simplified in language and limited to a maximum of 800 words.
2. If a corporation changes a UELA in mid-term and disagreeing with that change forfeits the right to use an already purchased product, then that corporation must provide a full refund for the product in addition to shipping and handling charges, should that product be returned to them, regardless of current market value.
Well I saw him post here and wanted to see if it would be as amazingly ironic as I thought it would be, and it far exceeded my expectations.Eldarion said:You saw that? I reported that post.Radeonx said:I'd just like to point out the gigantic amount of irony I found after looking at your probation post.Hunter15 said:all internet trolls must burn their hands off if they start trolling
Oh the irony IS delicious.
Thankyou, I've actually added one more you might like.Miles000 said:This man is a genius. Put him in charge.Ghengis John said:1.UELA's (User End License Agreements) Must be simplified in language and limited to a maximum of 800 words.
2. If a corporation changes a UELA in mid-term and disagreeing with that change forfeits the right to use an already purchased product, then that corporation must provide a full refund for the product in addition to shipping and handling charges, should that product be returned to them, regardless of current market value.
Has anyone actually read the new iTunes UELA.
I'm not joking there is a section about using iTunes for running a nuclear reactor or life support system in there.
This is a bad idea. If you have a 2/3 majority vote you're probably not going to employ a filibuster in the first place and no filibuster could remain entertaining for the length of time a filibuster is required to run for. Besides, again, chief point: that vote would be cut strictly by party lines and the intent of a filibuster IS to bore your opponents into submission.Paksenarrion said:Make filibusters entertaining by due process. If you're going to hold up the system, it damn well better be entertaining. This will be decided by 2/3 majority vote. If you do not have enough votes to deem your filibuster entertaining, your vote is temporarily determined as null and void for the particular bill you are filibustering.
The 2/3 majority vote is to determine if the filibuster was entertaining or not. If it's not entertaining, the congresspersons who participated in the filibuster void their votes regarding the bill they're filibustering. Basically, the people whose time you're wasting better be entertained, or your filibuster would have come to naught.Ghengis John said:Thankyou, I've actually added one more you might like.Miles000 said:This man is a genius. Put him in charge.Ghengis John said:1.UELA's (User End License Agreements) Must be simplified in language and limited to a maximum of 800 words.
2. If a corporation changes a UELA in mid-term and disagreeing with that change forfeits the right to use an already purchased product, then that corporation must provide a full refund for the product in addition to shipping and handling charges, should that product be returned to them, regardless of current market value.
Has anyone actually read the new iTunes UELA.
I'm not joking there is a section about using iTunes for running a nuclear reactor or life support system in there.This is a bad idea. If you have a 2/3 majority vote you're probably not going to employ a filibuster in the first place and no filibuster could remain entertaining for the length of time a filibuster is required to run for. Besides, again, chief point: that vote would be cut strictly by party lines and the intent of a filibuster IS to bore your opponents into submission.Paksenarrion said:Make filibusters entertaining by due process. If you're going to hold up the system, it damn well better be entertaining. This will be decided by 2/3 majority vote. If you do not have enough votes to deem your filibuster entertaining, your vote is temporarily determined as null and void for the particular bill you are filibustering.
OK.Ghengis John said:Thankyou, I've actually added one more you might like.Miles000 said:This man is a genius. Put him in charge.Ghengis John said:1.UELA's (User End License Agreements) Must be simplified in language and limited to a maximum of 800 words.
2. If a corporation changes a UELA in mid-term and disagreeing with that change forfeits the right to use an already purchased product, then that corporation must provide a full refund for the product in addition to shipping and handling charges, should that product be returned to them, regardless of current market value.
Has anyone actually read the new iTunes UELA.
I'm not joking there is a section about using iTunes for running a nuclear reactor or life support system in there.
Only it wouldn't work like that and the IDEA IS you waste everyone's time. If you have a 2/3 majority vote you have a passed bill. With all the money on the line and favors to return there is no way a faction with a majority vote is going to sit there and vote to allow a man to spray whipped cream on his head. He could be the world's greatest entertainer and they'd boot him off the stage to move along with their business. Filibusters are an act of desperation when your position is badly outnumbered. The very mechanics of when you employ them simply make your idea a bad one. The opposition, if allowed to vote on whether you can oppose them, would always vote no.Paksenarrion said:The 2/3 majority vote is to determine if the filibuster was entertaining or not. If it's not entertaining, the congresspersons who participated in the filibuster void their votes regarding the bill they're filibustering. Basically, the people whose time you're wasting better be entertained, or your filibuster would have come to naught.
The registry is fucked up. The urination thing is only in some states, but their definition of pedophile extends to anyone who has pictures of naked children. That's led to children being put on the registry. There are five-year-olds whose lives are ruined by the registry.smearyllama said:I'd fix the issues with the sex offender registry.
The way it is now, the guy who gets drunk and urinates in public is on the same level as the serial rapist.
What. The. Fuck.
Edit: I'd make the system work on a case-by-case basis, but you'd only be judged by certified, impartial judges, people who will think rationally, and come up with a fair punishment.