Because sometimes you need to know the angle something will launch at, and the force it will launch with, before you launch it. The only way you could measure it is by launching it. But if you instead know the forces of the objects propelling it, you can use them and trigonometry to deduce the force and angle before-hand.Cargando said:Any formula designed to 'find the missing side' (or angle) in a shape. [i/]Why not just measure it?!![/i]
0.999... = 1 [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.85789]Fbuh said:Well, it's not a formula per se, but the entire concept of 1/3. 1/3 basically negates all logic that mathematics are based upon for the simple fact that one-third equals .33 repeating endlessly. If you put three one-thirds together, all you get is .99 repeating endlessly. That is why I hate mathematics. I refuse to acknowledge it as logic or intelligence becasue of this. You can't split something into three parts, then put it back together to have it be less than it was endlessly repeating forever. You see what I mean? It doesn't fucking make any sense! That and logarithms.
You just proved me right.Maze1125 said:Because sometimes you need to know the angle something will launch at, and the force it will launch with, before you launch it. The only way you could measure it is by launching it. But if you instead know the forces of the objects propelling it, you can use them and trigonometry to deduce the force and angle before-hand.Cargando said:Any formula designed to 'find the missing side' (or angle) in a shape. [i/]Why not just measure it?!![/i]
0.999... = 1 [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.85789]Fbuh said:Well, it's not a formula per se, but the entire concept of 1/3. 1/3 basically negates all logic that mathematics are based upon for the simple fact that one-third equals .33 repeating endlessly. If you put three one-thirds together, all you get is .99 repeating endlessly. That is why I hate mathematics. I refuse to acknowledge it as logic or intelligence becasue of this. You can't split something into three parts, then put it back together to have it be less than it was endlessly repeating forever. You see what I mean? It doesn't fucking make any sense! That and logarithms.
No, I didn't. I just proved you don't understand how decimal expansions work.Fbuh said:You just proved me right.
No, I meant you proved me right in saying ti doesn't make sense. I'm not trying to argue, I'm just saying that my own mathematical expertise would lose out to a ten year old. I actually had to relearn multiplication/division before I could go onto college math.Maze1125 said:No, I didn't. I just proved you don't understand how decimal expansions work.Fbuh said:You just proved me right.
0.999.. is 1. It may be an odd way of writing it, but nevertheless, when you write 0.999..., you are writing down a number that means the same thing as writing down 1. Decimals are just representations of numbers, 0.333... represents 1/3 and 0.999... represents 1.
1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1
0.333... + 0.333... + 0.333... = 0.999... = 1
Perfectly correct and consistent. There is no contradiction but the one you imagine.
Congratulations sir, you have won the thread.SakSak said:Bessel functions.
![]()
where alpha is any arbitary real or complex number.
Useful in solving problems in cylindrical co-ordinate system. But I absolutely detest integral calculus beyond the extreme basics taught at college A-level maths (at least in Finland)