Su.zaku said:
Daipire said:
Simalacrum said:
Interactive Entertainment seems like a pretty reasonable 'mature' sounding title.
And can be shortened to InEn.
I'm with this guy, it's official without coming off as unnecessarily pretentious ('video-electic stimulation').
Damn, got thread ninja'd
OT: What about 'Interactive Experience', shortened to 'InEx'? Mainly because if we want games to be treated as an art medium, the purpose of some games won't be to entertain the player; as how some books are designed to disturb the reader. Your thoughts?
"I'm a hardcore InEx-er." Rolls off the tongue a lot easier, but some might (when it comes to gamers, read: thousands will) argue that a game is entertainment even if it's designed to scare, horrify or generally force-crap-into-the-pants-off the audience.
Every game is certainly an experience, but every game can (or at least hope to be) called entertaining.
Unfortunately, every that actively tries to work in something such as either "InEn-er" or "InEx-er" is probably going to be paid out, pretty bad.
Jock: Hey, what a loser!
Nerd: Hey, I'm an InWhatev-er.
Jock: NEEEEEEEEEEERD.
Tl;Dr: I think we stop calling ourselves 'gamers' and just say 'I play video games'.
It's the difference between. "I'm stereotyped into being a social pariah" and "I escape reality every once in a while".