Nobody can deny that the quest is sexist, but it's not really the point as far as I see.Vanorae said:The Elder Scrolls: Skyrim
Not saying the game as a whole is sexist. But I have a problem with the quest given by Svana Far-Shield in Haelga's Bunkhouse in Riften. The objective is to collect the marks of Dibella given by Haelga from the men she slept with in order to confront her with it and humiliate her. The quest is making her out to be some kind of villain just because she had sex. How dare she? You would never see a quest like this relating to a man. This is an example of slut-shaming that I'm not okay with.
The quest is not set up so that slut shaming the woman makes you the "good guy", you are not high fived by random people telling you what a good job you did "putting the woman in her place".
Have you thought that perhaps it doesn't exist because of sexist attitudes by the developers, but to show what intolerant and sexist people there are in Skyrim (the country)?
Like how the first time you go into Windhelm, you see two racist Nords bullying a Dark Elf. The game isn't doing it because the developers are racist and want to express it, they had it to show the nastier side of the race trying to argue for "freedom".
The point I am trying to make is that the sexism is not seen as a good thing in the context of the game. It's not there to make a point, or to show the developers thoughts on women. It is there to show a darker side to the people in the world, and to emphasise the nastier elements of society.
Sexism as in, the developers having women wearing skimpy metal bikini's while their male counterparts are in armour that makes sense, is bad. But sexism (or any other ism) that is there as a plot device, or to create depth of character is not necessarily, but for some reason some people cannot tell the difference between the two.
I am not suggesting that you can't, but I feel that your example is the latter, rather than the former.