Little King's Story - Wii

Recommended Videos

fletch_talon

Elite Member
Nov 6, 2008
1,461
0
41
Ok, we all know very well that the Wii is lacking somewhat in the games department. Don't get me wrong, I know from experience that good games exist, sometimes they're just a bit tricky to find. Little King's Story seems a prime example of this. The amount of hype regarding this game seems somewhat lacking, which is a shame, because from the first trailer I saw it was clear to me that it could very well break the drought of quality third party games for the Wii. It could well be that this optimistic view came about because I am not what most would call a 'hardcore' gamer. This meant I was much more open to a game whose cut scenes resembled illustrations from a child's picture book. In fact the cutesy style is something I like in a game, if everything had to be serious and dark then I wouldn't have bought a Wii and I never would have played this game, which as I now know would have been an awful shame.

For those of you not living in the EU/AU regions, it seems you'll have to wait a bit. In fact, the usual schedule for game releases seems to have reversed from the norm, with Wikipedia stating a 24/4 release for us, 23/6 for the US and Japan have yet to have a date confirmed. I myself only picked up the game yesterday (day of release) and have had considerable trouble putting it down.

The story is unique in some ways, cliche in others, resulting in something familiar but new enough to get you hooked. You play as a young boy who is lonely, until chance finds him in the forest where he discovers a crown. Apparently this act alone makes him king, reminiscent of Arthur pulling the sword from the stone. Like Arthur your character is not alone, where the Pendragon had Merlin, you have three advisers, records adviser - Verde, anything (tutorials, treasure, etc.) adviser - Liam, and perhaps most peculiarly Howzer the bull knight. Yes somehow seeing an elderly well mustachioed man riding on his noble steed Pancho the cow makes you realise that this game has an odd sense of humour.
Your adventure begins by upgrading your kingdom, its full of slackers and Howzer suggests you do something about it. Once your kingdom has some useful residents its time to expand, this will of course involve violence. This violence may be directed against oppressive UMA (unidentified mysterious animals, this games version of monsters) or against other Kings in order to claim their kingdom, if in doubt ask Howzer, he seems all too happy to direct you along your path to WORLD DOMINATION!!! Muahahahahahaha *cough*.
Ahem, sorry, but that really is quite accurate, the game deals with world domination, and a slightly kiddy-fied version of genocide in order to get it. It also pokes fun at religious themes when a messenger of the God of 'The Sect of Soup' comes to town telling you to build him a church OR ELSE. This helps the game appeal to older audiences to despite an outward appearance that would otherwise repel them.



The gameplay I'm told is much like Pikmin, but since I've never played Pikmin here's how it goes. You directly control the king (a very hands on king it seems) with the nunchuk and use to recruit villagers and (A) to direct them where you want. [Z] brings up a targetting system (basically a line showing you which way you're facing) and (+) or (-) brings up a menu. So from that description, I'm guessing you noticed I said nothing about motion controls, heck, even the pointer function is out. This is both a pro and a con, many will be ecstatic at the absence of control schemes often dubbed 'clunky' or 'tacked on'. On the other hand, this seems a game in which pointer controls could have gone over well and not using them seems to defeat the purpose in some ways of placing the game on the Wii.

As previously mentioned, you start of with a village full of rather useless subjects, named "carefree adults" who spend their days spinning and dancing and telling you how every day is Sunday to them. Now I say useless, but technically they do have their uses, for instance they can dig... though not very well. Digging is at first, your one and only form of income, you dig to find treasure and then sit on your throne to trade treasure for the kingdom's currency 'Bol'. Once you obtain enough Bol, you can finally give your carefree adults a kick up the arse by purchasing one of two initial job centers, the farmhouse and the guard hut. Send them to these buildings and they become a farmer or a guard respectively. Guards or 'grunt soldiers' as they're called are obviously for fighting whilst farmers are for digging. What's that? Yes they could already do that as carefree adults, but farmers do it faster and can dig where they couldn't before. The class system seems to carry on this way, with different obstacles requiring different classes.

This leads to the strategy element of LKS, the decision of just who you need to take with you when you wander into the wide open world. Sure you might feel safe with a party full of grunts (at first) but what happens if you find a hole to dig up or one of the large trees that block your way later in the game. And you'll want to choose wisely too. Something I have yet to mention is that each villager is named, they form relationships, they have children and when their life goes down, it really shows. Characters with a single life point left become old timers until you heal them up. I personally have found myself restarting everytime I lose a character, not wanting to bear the guilt of lives lost.



The music adds to the charming atmosphere of the game. Its all classical (at least in style) and despite not being a fan, I found it very easy to lose track of time because I was too busy enjoying the calming music coupled with beautiful environments. They change drastically with the time of day, the afternoon sun casts a red tinge over everything whilst the sunrise makes everything shine, especially in small meadows where sunbeams are visible through the mist. The only flaw I could see here was that at certain times of day it felt like I truly was facing the mid afternoon sun, on occasion it made my eyes water, but I put this down to my TV which is not the best quality.

Speaking of flaws, only one comes to mind thusfar, and its not even my own. Other reviewers have expressed disappointment in the save function as it is only able to be used at the castle, meaning loss in battle can result in a long trek back to an important boss. In its defence I have to say that without this setback there would be less challenge to the game, and it adds incentive to be cautious and get things right first time.

Overall I'm of the opinion that this game deserves the 90%+ reviews that it has recieved elsewhere, but it needs more interest in order to be truly successful. Hence the reason I wrote this review, I couldn't stand back and watch another quality game get overlooked, perhaps long after release the interest would grow, but the fact is it needs it now. For all those who lament the lack of quality games for Wii, this is your chance to change things. For those who complain at the lack of originality in games, you need to show your support. And those of you who want to see a good game get the recognition it deserves, now is the time to buy this game. I hope this has swayed you to at least look into this game further, it may not be a good review, but at the very least I hope it has raised awareness for the story of a little king.



Images thanks to IGN because I am without adequate technology and it was a spur of the moment review.
 

fletch_talon

Elite Member
Nov 6, 2008
1,461
0
41
I didn't want to do this and I know its somewhat naughty, but I'm bumping this thread. I really want to know that someone is seeing this, it really is a great game and I don't want to hear that the designers gave up on creativity and originality because their first attempt at it went unnoticed.
 

Sharktech

New member
Aug 19, 2009
4
0
0
Original!? 0_o Pikmin came out 8 years ago... how is this any different? Not to mention overlord... obviously you have never played these games. I rate this game 40% mostly because it has good music. but the dialog seemed to read like it was written by a 3 year old as well as the graphic style. Which seems strange since a 3 year old obviously could never understand this game.. this kind of thing is exactly what is killing the wii.. its good that its a system for everyone.. but they shouldnt be marketing to 5 year olds and housewives so much.. and a recomended age should be marked clearly...honestly though the type of people that would like this game I'm guessing mainly children aged 7 to 13 I dont think they would like chalk and crayon graphics its even insulting to them... but most of all please dont repackage 8 year old games.
 

Sharktech

New member
Aug 19, 2009
4
0
0
dont get me wrong I like cute and quirky too.. but more a super mario world style of cartoon graphics rather than yoshis story with crayons etc.. its just a personal opinion.. but I dont think I'm alone.
 

danosaurus

New member
Mar 11, 2008
834
0
0
Sharktech said:
Original!? 0_o Pikmin came out 8 years ago... how is this any different? Not to mention overlord... obviously you have never played these games. I rate this game 40% mostly because it has good music. but the dialog seemed to read like it was written by a 3 year old as well as the graphic style. Which seems strange since a 3 year old obviously could never understand this game.. this kind of thing is exactly what is killing the wii.. its good that its a system for everyone.. but they shouldnt be marketing to 5 year olds and housewives so much.. and a recomended age should be marked clearly...honestly though the type of people that would like this game I'm guessing mainly children aged 7 to 13 I dont think they would like chalk and crayon graphics its even insulting to them... but most of all please dont repackage 8 year old games.
In case you haven't noticed - originality died a long time ago.
You speak of originality and quote 'Overlord' and 'Pikmin' when you should be referencing games like 'Lemmings' and 'Command And Conquer', if you truly were aiming to highlight the roots of this games structure.
The definition of originality, nowadays, lies in well-disguised plagiarism.

That aside, don't bust out your first post as an abusive rant towards a reviewer. The OP has obviously taken the time to write something he's passionate about and has done so exceedingly well, relative to a lot of other reviews, then you come along and drop your hate all over it because you don't see eye to eye with him.

Who are you to assume what specific aged demographics should enjoy?
I for one am a huge fan of stylised graphics, I'm 25 years old and I think this game is visually appealing in every sense. Perhaps you're the one with the immature mind if you can't appreciate something with a little artistic originality?

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for intelligent debates on peoples reviews in this forum but when you bust in as a new escapist member and just post unsubstantiated and clearly subjective opinions and claims without even an attempt to back them up, I consider it an insult to not only the OP but to the entire community.

You've clearly lurked the site for long enough to know better.
 

Sharktech

New member
Aug 19, 2009
4
0
0
So let me get this straight I'm insulting the entire communty becuase I dont like little kings story.. 0_o I never directly insulted the reviewer so that is rubbish. I said that I thought he was wrong.. and if this site has credibility like you say then my opinon is as valid as this guys.. otherwise whats the point in having a comments section other than to stroke each others egos? And I have played the game it is nothing like lemmings.. or command and conquer. there is no difference in the game mechanics to pikmin what so ever... you play a character that leads around an army of other characters harvesting plants and ganging up on strange creatures.. this is nothing like command and conquer at all tell me how it is like command and conquer!

And let me get this straight you like naive crayon drawings of stick figures and think that I'm imature because I don't.

you cant actually be serious.
 

Sharktech

New member
Aug 19, 2009
4
0
0
I mean I've played worse games its not actually that bad I did say it has good music.. I just think that along side the 90% reviews it has been getting everywhere it's also been getting claims of original gameplay.. and its just not true. I've been playing games for 20 years... and I finished all 100 levels of lemmings and yes that was originality but so were most games back then.. they had to be because they didnt have bloom effects and waggling to make people think they actually spent there money on something worthwhile.. so ok.. I'll push my review up to 70% because it doesnt have waggling games and it has good music. :p happy now?
 

Emphraim

New member
Mar 27, 2009
831
0
0
Nice review. I really wanted this game but completely forgot about it and haven't seen anything about it till this thread. Thank you for reminding me. Now, where is my Pokemon Emerald money holding case?