LittleBigPlanet Delayed Over Religious Controversy

Recommended Videos

runtheplacered

New member
Oct 31, 2007
1,472
0
0
HalfShadow post=7.74280.828264 said:
Well, I find suicide bombers deeply offending, but hey.
Cool, I think I just found the winner in my "find the most ignorant person you can" contest, for the week.
 

runtheplacered

New member
Oct 31, 2007
1,472
0
0
Baby Tea post=7.74280.828161 said:
EDIT: And as a quick note: Just because I understand why they'd be upset, it doesn't mean that I agree with their position.
Then what does it mean? You're quick to bash somebody for giving their opinion, then don't even give yours? What's the point of your post, then?

Unless muslims have a copyright on those particular words, this makes absolutely no sense to me why they can't be used. People get offended and the world continues to turn. Oh well.
 

DamienHell

New member
Oct 17, 2007
656
0
0
Baby Tea post=7.74280.828188 said:
So you reference a movie done by atheists saying such a movie is 'FTW', but then you turn around calling atheists 'asshats' and say you're a 'Spiritual Agnostic'...even after saying that all religions are myths.
Theists are asshates
Atheists are asshats
Agnostics are asshats
THEREFORE everyone is an asshat
ElArabDeMagnifico post=7.74280.828246 said:
I'm going to found my own religion and decree that any kind of DRM is deeply offending to members of my religion then complain to EA and Ubisoft and see if I can make them stop putting DRM in games.


Anyone up for recruitment?
All hail
 

oAmadeuso

New member
Sep 7, 2008
108
0
0
Just emailed a mate in Hong Kong, hopefully he'll be able to get a copy there before the re-call.

On that note though, a lot of indie shops have been breaking the street date on this.
They're going to be getting fines when they can return the games because they're been sold.
IIRC it's a pretty hefty fine too...

On the music, ok I get that it's against the islamic code for the words to be song but why wasnt there
an outcry with the cd was originally made? It's licensed music. Media molecule didnt create it
 

tendo82

Uncanny Valley Cave Dweller
Nov 30, 2007
1,283
0
0
The irony here is that for all people fear the government censoring their games it is in fact the corporations, fearing loss of revenue, that will be the worst censors we are likely to encounter.

Still, as annoyed as I am about this, I can't but wonder if I'm viewing this through an extremely narrow cultural lens. I'm not a Muslim so it's impossible for me to judge the severity of this insult. The Japanese are infamous for including black face sambo stereotypes in their comics and the occasional videogame(I'm looking at you Jynx). This would be unthinkable in the US. But the Japanese didn't have to deal with the social upheaval associated with slavery and the civil rights movement, so the image carries no weight for them. Just as using some oddly apocalyptic words from the Qur'an in a song means nothing to me.

So am I frustrated the game is being delayed by something that a majority of Americans won't blink twice at? Absolutely. But in a game hoping to foster an enormous community with the relatively universal appeal of its material, I can certainly understand Sony's decision and even respect it.
 

ElArabDeMagnifico

New member
Dec 20, 2007
3,775
0
0
tendo82 post=7.74280.828345 said:
The irony here is that for all people fear the government censoring their games it is in fact the corporations, fearing loss of revenue, that will be the worst censors we are likely to encounter.

Still, as annoyed as I am about this, I can't but wonder if I'm viewing this through an extremely narrow cultural lens. I'm not a Muslim so it's impossible for me to judge the severity of this insult. The Japanese are infamous for including black face sambo stereotypes in their comics and the occasional videogame(I'm looking at you Jynx). This would be unthinkable in the US. But the Japanese didn't have to deal with the social upheaval associated with slavery and the civil rights movement, so the image carries no weight for them. Just as using some oddly apocalyptic words from the Qur'an in a song means nothing to me.

So am I frustrated the game is being delayed by something that a majority of Americans won't blink twice at? Absolutely. But in a game hoping to foster an enormous community with the relatively universal appeal of its material, I can certainly understand Sony's decision and even respect it.
If a patch has been made, what's a recall going to do? Cost more money for them?
 

shadow skill

New member
Oct 12, 2007
2,850
0
0
You know Sony caught shit for that church level in Resistance.... I can see why they decided to just scrap the disks even with the day one patch. Personally I think it's the right thing to do for any kind of day one patch because not everyone does have internet.
 

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
runtheplacered post=7.74280.828364 said:
Malygris post=7.74280.828353 said:
Anyone who hasn't heard the song and question and would like to do so can find it in full at the MySpace page of the artist, Toumani Diabate.

http://www.myspace.com/toumanidiabate
Which song is it?
Duh, sorry, it's Tapha Niang. It was actually released in 2006 and licensed for use in the game, and interestingly, the artist is apparently a "devout Muslim."
 

Crunchy English

Victim of a Savage Neck-bearding
Aug 20, 2008
779
0
0
This isn't about religion, it's about censorship and politics. What the hell man? My mom's a pacifist and is often deeply, deeply offended when I cut a dude's head off in a video game or shoot a guy in the head. Offensive materials should not hold a game from being released. Change the rating maybe, but not delay a release.

Sorry, but whatever your faith is, the fact that you are offended should be a real shame... and completely irrelevant
 

Archon

New member
Nov 12, 2002
916
0
0
Baby Tea post=7.74280.828188 said:
You know I totally forgot about that. Beautiful piece of music, though. Anyways, I wouldn't call that a double standard, since this is referencing the Quran and 'Baba Yetu' is referencing the Bible. Two totally different religions (And books). Christians didn't mind Baba Yetu, Mulsims obviously mind this.
What makes it a double standard is that Christian groups often *do* express outrage over the (mis)use of Christian material in film, games, or entertainment, but this outrage does not provoke fear, apologies, cancellations, and/or world wide delays of products. And one can't claim economic basis for the action, because for most Western products there are far more Christian consumers than Muslim consumers.

So when companies have such visceral reactions to the outrage of one religioun, yet ignore the outrage of another religion, without economic basis, it seems like the very definition of a double standard.
 

Amnestic

High Priest of Haruhi
Aug 22, 2008
8,946
0
0
Archon post=7.74280.828428 said:
Baby Tea post=7.74280.828188 said:
You know I totally forgot about that. Beautiful piece of music, though. Anyways, I wouldn't call that a double standard, since this is referencing the Quran and 'Baba Yetu' is referencing the Bible. Two totally different religions (And books). Christians didn't mind Baba Yetu, Mulsims obviously mind this.
What makes it a double standard is that Christian groups often *do* express outrage over the (mis)use of Christian material in film, games, or entertainment, but this outrage does not provoke fear, apologies, cancellations, and/or world wide delays of products. And one can't claim economic basis for the action, because for most Western products there are far more Christian consumers than Muslim consumers.

So when companies have such visceral reactions to the outrage of one religioun, yet ignore the outrage of another religion, without economic basis, it seems like the very definition of a double standard.
Guy on page 1 reminded me of the Manchester Cathedral fiasco. As I recall Sony apologised, but they didn't change it. Why not do the same? Apologise for any offenses caused, but simply say that they're not changing it.
 
Dec 1, 2007
782
0
0
Archon post=7.74280.828428 said:
What makes it a double standard is that Christian groups often *do* express outrage over the (mis)use of Christian material in film, games, or entertainment, but this outrage does not provoke fear, apologies, cancellations, and/or world wide delays of products.
That outrage also doesn't often provoke death fatwahs from the outraged either.
 

Baby Tea

Just Ask Frankie
Sep 18, 2008
4,687
0
0
Archon post=7.74280.828428 said:
Baby Tea post=7.74280.828188 said:
You know I totally forgot about that. Beautiful piece of music, though. Anyways, I wouldn't call that a double standard, since this is referencing the Quran and 'Baba Yetu' is referencing the Bible. Two totally different religions (And books). Christians didn't mind Baba Yetu, Mulsims obviously mind this.
What makes it a double standard is that Christian groups often *do* express outrage over the (mis)use of Christian material in film, games, or entertainment, but this outrage does not provoke fear, apologies, cancellations, and/or world wide delays of products. And one can't claim economic basis for the action, because for most Western products there are far more Christian consumers than Muslim consumers.

So when companies have such visceral reactions to the outrage of one religion, yet ignore the outrage of another religion, without economic basis, it seems like the very definition of a double standard.
I stand corrected. I guess I was looking at the specific example of the use of 'Baba Yetu'.