Cool, I think I just found the winner in my "find the most ignorant person you can" contest, for the week.HalfShadow post=7.74280.828264 said:Well, I find suicide bombers deeply offending, but hey.
Then what does it mean? You're quick to bash somebody for giving their opinion, then don't even give yours? What's the point of your post, then?Baby Tea post=7.74280.828161 said:EDIT: And as a quick note: Just because I understand why they'd be upset, it doesn't mean that I agree with their position.
Theists are asshatesBaby Tea post=7.74280.828188 said:So you reference a movie done by atheists saying such a movie is 'FTW', but then you turn around calling atheists 'asshats' and say you're a 'Spiritual Agnostic'...even after saying that all religions are myths.
All hailElArabDeMagnifico post=7.74280.828246 said:I'm going to found my own religion and decree that any kind of DRM is deeply offending to members of my religion then complain to EA and Ubisoft and see if I can make them stop putting DRM in games.
Anyone up for recruitment?
Which song is it?Malygris post=7.74280.828353 said:Anyone who hasn't heard the song and question and would like to do so can find it in full at the MySpace page of the artist, Toumani Diabate.
http://www.myspace.com/toumanidiabate
If a patch has been made, what's a recall going to do? Cost more money for them?tendo82 post=7.74280.828345 said:The irony here is that for all people fear the government censoring their games it is in fact the corporations, fearing loss of revenue, that will be the worst censors we are likely to encounter.
Still, as annoyed as I am about this, I can't but wonder if I'm viewing this through an extremely narrow cultural lens. I'm not a Muslim so it's impossible for me to judge the severity of this insult. The Japanese are infamous for including black face sambo stereotypes in their comics and the occasional videogame(I'm looking at you Jynx). This would be unthinkable in the US. But the Japanese didn't have to deal with the social upheaval associated with slavery and the civil rights movement, so the image carries no weight for them. Just as using some oddly apocalyptic words from the Qur'an in a song means nothing to me.
So am I frustrated the game is being delayed by something that a majority of Americans won't blink twice at? Absolutely. But in a game hoping to foster an enormous community with the relatively universal appeal of its material, I can certainly understand Sony's decision and even respect it.
Duh, sorry, it's Tapha Niang. It was actually released in 2006 and licensed for use in the game, and interestingly, the artist is apparently a "devout Muslim."runtheplacered post=7.74280.828364 said:Which song is it?Malygris post=7.74280.828353 said:Anyone who hasn't heard the song and question and would like to do so can find it in full at the MySpace page of the artist, Toumani Diabate.
http://www.myspace.com/toumanidiabate
And now, a word from Eli Sunday.axia777 post=7.74280.828151 said:THEY ARE ALL MYTHS!!!!!
What makes it a double standard is that Christian groups often *do* express outrage over the (mis)use of Christian material in film, games, or entertainment, but this outrage does not provoke fear, apologies, cancellations, and/or world wide delays of products. And one can't claim economic basis for the action, because for most Western products there are far more Christian consumers than Muslim consumers.Baby Tea post=7.74280.828188 said:You know I totally forgot about that. Beautiful piece of music, though. Anyways, I wouldn't call that a double standard, since this is referencing the Quran and 'Baba Yetu' is referencing the Bible. Two totally different religions (And books). Christians didn't mind Baba Yetu, Mulsims obviously mind this.
Guy on page 1 reminded me of the Manchester Cathedral fiasco. As I recall Sony apologised, but they didn't change it. Why not do the same? Apologise for any offenses caused, but simply say that they're not changing it.Archon post=7.74280.828428 said:What makes it a double standard is that Christian groups often *do* express outrage over the (mis)use of Christian material in film, games, or entertainment, but this outrage does not provoke fear, apologies, cancellations, and/or world wide delays of products. And one can't claim economic basis for the action, because for most Western products there are far more Christian consumers than Muslim consumers.Baby Tea post=7.74280.828188 said:You know I totally forgot about that. Beautiful piece of music, though. Anyways, I wouldn't call that a double standard, since this is referencing the Quran and 'Baba Yetu' is referencing the Bible. Two totally different religions (And books). Christians didn't mind Baba Yetu, Mulsims obviously mind this.
So when companies have such visceral reactions to the outrage of one religioun, yet ignore the outrage of another religion, without economic basis, it seems like the very definition of a double standard.
That outrage also doesn't often provoke death fatwahs from the outraged either.Archon post=7.74280.828428 said:What makes it a double standard is that Christian groups often *do* express outrage over the (mis)use of Christian material in film, games, or entertainment, but this outrage does not provoke fear, apologies, cancellations, and/or world wide delays of products.
I stand corrected. I guess I was looking at the specific example of the use of 'Baba Yetu'.Archon post=7.74280.828428 said:What makes it a double standard is that Christian groups often *do* express outrage over the (mis)use of Christian material in film, games, or entertainment, but this outrage does not provoke fear, apologies, cancellations, and/or world wide delays of products. And one can't claim economic basis for the action, because for most Western products there are far more Christian consumers than Muslim consumers.Baby Tea post=7.74280.828188 said:You know I totally forgot about that. Beautiful piece of music, though. Anyways, I wouldn't call that a double standard, since this is referencing the Quran and 'Baba Yetu' is referencing the Bible. Two totally different religions (And books). Christians didn't mind Baba Yetu, Mulsims obviously mind this.
So when companies have such visceral reactions to the outrage of one religion, yet ignore the outrage of another religion, without economic basis, it seems like the very definition of a double standard.