LoadingReadyRun: Assassin Creeds
- Thread starter Graham_LRR
- Start date
Recommended Videos
The Gentleman said:
I have been saying for years, Canada is infected with the french. this is why otherwise normal canadians, made in gods image just like americans, are just slightly inferior to the real thing. That's why europeans dont hate Canadians, they sympathize with them, because despite moving all the way across the world, they could not stave off the cancerous french influence Europe has been suffering from since europe was a THING. America, on the other hand, not only shook off it's franconian ailments, but became TWICE AS POWERFUL as a result of doing so.raven47172 said:
In fact, the lingering radiation from Canada's french population is the reason we, as Americans, have not been able to ascend to our rightful state of neo-god beings, and have become trapped in fleshy, sad meat piles. This also explains our obsession with unnatural beauty, as we are subconsciously trying to ACHIEVE said state.
And now, to start a religion and use gullible follower money to buy baguettes
The main character DOES have guns. Dual pistols. And there's a screenshot of him with a rifle. He also has a bow. The redcoats we've seen him fighting have been using their bayonets in close combat. He dual wields a tomahawk and knife in close combat. You seem to be assuming that they're keeping the exact same combat mechanics, and you're incorrect. They've said that all parts of the game have been reworked. This isn't an "exapansion game" like Brotherhood or Revelations. This is a sequel.cricket chirps said:A fair question.TIMESWORDSMAN said:
I feel that it is out of place in the series. Though that is not entirely my reason it is a part. I feel that for once it might actually be predictable and i don't like that.
I mean from the trailer and gameinformer's articles(let alone the art itself screams it) George washington will turn out to be a templar or atleast an antaginist. Hence the black trench coat they have him in for no other reason than to make him look JUST stereotypically evil enough that when they make the "big reveal" it wont seem unbelievable.
I feel they are just trying to avoid puting guns in the game for as long as possible so they wont have to remake the mechanics of the game. Which sadly is inevitable if they want to go any further into the future. I really like the mechanics currently but even i see that it will have to change if they ever want to just finish desmonds story in the future -_- which i wish they would just jump to already.
-note that i have yet to finish Revalations as i have been busy and have been able to avoid spoilers so who knows, maybe he is already dead or something-
I have further issue that even in the time period they are about to set it in. They ALMOST NEVER used swords; rifles and cannons in lines were the only way they fought unless they were under attack from native americans. I just think that they do infact have to stretch the logical reality of it a bit too much to keep the games general mechanics working in this new setting. While that is inevitable in my eyes, i wished they had simply jumped into the future by now to do an overhaul, and not just stretch the series longer and make the story more "deep" and "complex"
Edit: sorry for making it so long. I've been talking about this with friends and co-workers since the announcement and i've explained my side so many times i honestly can't think of how i phrased it so well before. Even i admit that all that ^ might not be well worded.just so dissapointed that this is the direction the series is taking.
And George Washington is Conner's ally. Plus he dies in 1799, which is after the game ends, so it's unlikely he'll turn on him. Just because we know he had a PoE at some point doesn't mean he used it for evil, or that he was a Templar.
Well when you consider that France and Britain went to war against each other when settling in the 'New World', and later those same British colonists revolted and became Americans...it's kinda ironic. ESPECIALLY when you consider that the later-formed Canada and America were on bad terms with each other (Canada was considered loyalist since we got independence through diplomacy, while America was seperatist to Britian through revolution) and now in modern times we have French Canadians (Who may or may not be descended from the original French colonists) are releasing a game about a period in time when everyone was kinda against each other for various reasons.Calvar Draveir said:
So overall it's kinda situational irony, but it won't actually affect how good the game will be.
I understand all of that, but calling it irony is kinda a bit of a stretch in my opinion. I mean, there have been french and british characters in previous ACs. And as is reminded at the beginning of every AC game, it was made by a multicultural group of people. Just looking at their interviews you can find french, american, canadian, australian, and many other nationalities, just among the most prominent devs alone.SteewpidZombie said:
So, yeah, I get what you're saying, but I don't really consider it ironic. After all, the Revolution involved many, many different countries. Most of the game studios in the western world come from a country involved in it.
Wow, that Team America theme song really sums up why people hate America.JokerboyJordan said:You would be mistakenCardinalPiggles said:
Loved the video, anyway. The LRR one, obviously.
