it's true, macroevolution cannot explain morality. cultural anthropology and psychology do that.ben---neb said:On a sidenote the theory of the Big Bang and macroevolution cause more problems than they solve: i.e. Macroevolution cannot adaquatly explain morality and the Big Bang is basically the theory that: nothing + time + chance = a universe
All knowledge of theology: God made everything. Don't pretend creationists are any better than these people.gotryfag said:Being a creationist implies knowledge of theology. So no, they're not creationist. I don't know how to define them really. Clowns? Insane? Silly, drug-addled buggers with rapidly falling amounts of brain cells?Doug said:They creationists or what?
because they're rapping while looking like ICP. My natural reactions of lol and EEEWW are in conflict with eachother.JoshTheater said:Why torn? LRR is making fun of ICP.the_lollipop_dragon said:I am so torn between my hatered of rap and ICP and my love of you guys.
I am so very confused right now.
You have it backwards, giraffes evolved to reach the tops of the trees. Using it to find a mate is just a bonus. This is what Richard Dawkins said on the Colbert Report.rafiqofthemany said:actually giraffes have long necks to combat other males the leaves on trees is just a plus
yeah well explain that to my evolution professor, while giraffes sometimes eat leaves from the top of the trees they mainly eat plants closer to the ground including during the dry season when leaves are harder to come by, on the other hand males who win in combat are more likely to mate and the male with the longer neck is more likely to winDecabo said:You have it backwards, giraffes evolved to reach the tops of the trees. Using it to find a mate is just a bonus. This is what Richard Dawkins said on the Colbert Report.rafiqofthemany said:actually giraffes have long necks to combat other males the leaves on trees is just a plus
Hmm...zombie711 said:this is Bill Nye the Science Guy meets 50 cent.
Best part!wfpdk said:"but why would someone have a child with you? It's a miracle!"
lol awesome
That's not what it implies at all. It's simply the belief that the universe was created 'as is' by a creator, rather than developed on its own, creator or not.gotryfag said:Being a creationist implies knowledge of theology. So no, they're not creationist.Doug said:They creationists or what?
Obviously not a linguistic person.tamerman said:im a sience persion myself, but that ICP song was just awsome!
I don't know what's funnier, the fact that you got offended that I referenced someone extremely knowledgeable on the subject to disprove you, or the fact that you're suggesting giraffes can only eat from one food source. If it'll help unbunch your panties, let's just say it came from multiple sources.rafiqofthemany said:yeah well explain that to my evolution professor, while giraffes sometimes eat leaves from the top of the trees they mainly eat plants closer to the ground including during the dry season when leaves are harder to come by, on the other hand males who win in combat are more likely to mate and the male with the longer neck is more likely to winDecabo said:You have it backwards, giraffes evolved to reach the tops of the trees. Using it to find a mate is just a bonus. This is what Richard Dawkins said on the Colbert Report.rafiqofthemany said:actually giraffes have long necks to combat other males the leaves on trees is just a plus
Ever heard of rap?theownerer said:sorry but the 'song' was pretty lame. Paul was just talking with music playing in the background.
Something I've never really understood. What does evolution have to do with morality anyway? Morality would more be a social development than a biological change. And how does Christianity explain morality, when morals developed Pre-Christianity, and in locations absent of God?ben---neb said:Macroevolution cannot adaquatly explain morality