no not realy. i suck at spelling.DanHibiki said:Obviously not a linguistic person.tamerman said:im a sience persion myself, but that ICP song was just awsome!
Yeah, that last bit was just plain hilarious.Furburt said:You fellows seem unable to do anything unfunny.
Please..don't try. This was hilarious enough.
Although, you do owe me a bottle of screen cleaning fluid. I sprayed coke out my nose when Paul said "All manner of science up in this *****!".
That's easy too, if you're racist.gotryfag said:Way to pander to internet memes u gais. So awesome. Mocking ICP is way too easy, try something harder next time. Like islamists or whatever.
Sir John Nikola Tesla, inventor of the Tesla Coil.Galad said:I loved how Paul was standing there, in the typical rapper pose, crossed hands, nodding head between 1:00 and 1:30. Also, whose scientist's was that portrait that was partially seen at the very beginning of the clip?
Same, especially since the bit as the whole fell flat for me. A few small chuckles here and there, but the whole bit was just meh to me. I may hate rap, but I'm open to parodies of rap songs (Weird Al's "White & Nerdy", anyone?). But this was just lacking.ucciolord1 said:I loved when you said "the internet!" and a series of tubes popped up. It's the little things.
Care to enlighten me what being a Juggalo means?Lord Xtheth said:I've been a long-time fan of this site, and feel it's time I say somthing.
Being a Juggalo myself, I would like to enlighten you to (at least my) idea of the song you decided to parody.
The song "Miracles" is essentially telling other juggalos (or fans of Insane Clown Posse) to go out and experience the world with a sence of wonder and apreciation instead of closing themself off from it. It isn't a "diss" to science whatsoever.
Sure, The Insane Clown Posse didn't do well in school, or even get to far in it either, but their accomplishments speak for themselves.
All in all I did enjoy your video, but I felt both sides of the story needed some clarification.
How do you know that the bible wasn't meant to be read metaphorically or that it really contains the word of god? And even if it contains the word of god, how do you know you're reading it "correctly"? What if god used the big bang, abiogenisis and evolution to create the universe, life and then evolve them into their current forms? Don't these discoveries make creation more miraculous? I think so personally.ben---neb said:Speaking as a Creationist - no. You see, I exist in a happy world between the two - accpeting that sceince is a great logical tool for making the miracle of creation even more miraclous! Finding about and explaining the world we live in honours God for we discover his thoughts after him.Doug said:I don't get it - I've only vaguely heard of ICP before; and given I already find their video annoying and ain't gonna watch it, can I ask what they did in this video that would piss off scientists? They creationists or what?
Every so often though science or rather scientists overstep their mark and come up with theories that contradict the Genesis 1 six day account. Obviosuly as such accounts contradict the Word of God they are wrong but scientists prefer theories without a God they would have to be accountable too.
On a sidenote the theory of the Big Bang and macroevolution cause more problems than they solve: i.e. Macroevolution cannot adaquatly explain morality and the Big Bang is basically the theory that: nothing + time + chance = a universe