Whatever suits your likings, friendoktalist said:QUOTED!
Okay, so you didn't mean what I thought you meant.din0 said:Whatever suits your likings, friendoktalist said:QUOTED!If you claim that it's that useful, well, good for you
I am no programmer, so I wouldn't know. But the whole attitude towards Linux is all like: "Ooh, look how cool it looks! I am totally getting that hot-ass piece of soft! And blah blah, blahbidy, blah, blah!" So, that's what I meant by "looks". Nobody who knows the name of his OS, or what OS stands for, for that matter, is cool, so don't get so hyped-up ;d (JK).
Admittedly most Alienware systems are like that (especially the desktops), but the m11x has just the right balance between power and battery life, which makes it an ideal computer.RhombusHatesYou said:rabidmidget said:Alienware m11x.
Speaking of prebuilt systems priced way beyond what their hardware is worth.
I actually think I noticed that while typing it but ignored it... Just an error on my part, I believe. My point was that they're becoming MORE alike.Soylent Bacon said:I'm confused. You say that Mac and PC have become the same choice, for the most part, but use "[Mac] is overpriced and it's purely for the aesthetics, but it's not considerably more powerful" as a point to support that? It seems like you're kinda defeating your own argument that each is a reasonable choice, and instead saying that people should buy computers with a Windows OS to save money for essentially the same product.
...or is that your point? Like I said, I'm confused about what you're trying to get across.
Crysis? Fallout 3? Bad Company 2? Metro 2033? Mass Effect 2? Mount and Blade: Warband?Aeshi said:I Prefer OSX,the extra games isn't much of an advantage when you realize most of the games not on OSX can be summed up in one or more of the words "Shit(ty)" "Console" and "Port" and the few that aren't will be buried under a stream of pop-ups from Windows.
.
Haha, I like the kid XDD And you may be right about the hard-on guys. But you must have not been to Bulgaria, then(not that I am surprised). Here, everyone(well, everyone of the few who use computers, understand them and actually use Linux) is so hyped-up about the 3D bs, that it makes me sick. So I guess they must have given me the wrong impression about the Linux.oktalist said:Okay, so you didn't mean what I thought you meant.din0 said:Whatever suits your likings, friendoktalist said:QUOTED!If you claim that it's that useful, well, good for you
I am no programmer, so I wouldn't know. But the whole attitude towards Linux is all like: "Ooh, look how cool it looks! I am totally getting that hot-ass piece of soft! And blah blah, blahbidy, blah, blah!" So, that's what I meant by "looks". Nobody who knows the name of his OS, or what OS stands for, for that matter, is cool, so don't get so hyped-up ;d (JK).
But now it doesn't make any sense to me, because I've never ever seen anyone claim that Linux "looks better" in a superficial way than some other OS. If you mean things like Beryl or Compiz (funky 3D GUI crap), those are just addons* and I'm sure you can get similar things for Windows or OX/S.
* Well, everything is an addon in Linux-world really, except GNU and the kernel. What I mean is I don't think they are used by that many Linux users.
[EDIT] Thinking about it, those people getting hardons for how good it looks might just be expressing relief that at last Linux looks at least halfway decent, as historially it had a reputation for looking a bit pants compared to the competition, in terms of eye candy. [/EDIT]
Obviously OSes are in no way cool, in the "street cred" meaning of the word.![]()